AI-generated summary
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was framed 10 years prior to the statement, emphasizing restoration over retribution for children in conflict with the law, grounded in constitutional principles and international child rights conventions.
NEW DELHI: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant Saturday said a child in conflict with law must not only be heard but also be understood, since few young people can speak up for themselves before the police or any authority. Speaking on 10 years of the framing of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, Kant said very often, the child in conflict with law today was, only a little earlier, a child in need of care and protection whom we did not reach in time and that should be kept in mind while dealing with them.
"Our answer to such a predicament is restoration, not retribution. The Act presumes everyone below 18 to be innocent of any criminal intent, treats institutional care as a last resort, encourages diversion from formal proceedings, and prefers counselling, community service, and probation to confinement, while promising a fresh start. These choices flow from the Constitutional philosophy discernible from Articles 15(3) and 39 and also from the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which looks to the young assuming a constructive role in society. The 2015 Act thus makes a wager that a child given a second chance is far more likely to become a productive member of society than one branded as a criminal," he said. Supreme Court judge, Justice B V Nagarathna, who is heading SC's Juvenile Justice Committee, said adults have a duty to understand the anxieties of children. "We cannot be dismissive of their concerns, lest they feel alienated and rejected. The true measure of a society and its elders lies in how they deal with their children. We must ensure that we do not fail on that count. All children are ours and their distress is our distress too," Nagarathna said.
End of Article
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant intervened to secure the release of several advocates detained during protests in the Supreme Court area. The Supreme Court Bar Association had raised concerns regarding the use of excessive police force against the lawyers.
The Supreme Court will hear a contempt plea on Sunday concerning alleged violations of an October 9 order during protests in New Delhi. Thousands were detained Saturday as police enforced restrictions against a protest by the Cockroach Janta Party.
A Delhi court has revoked the interim bail of Sharjeel Imam, an accused in the 2020 North-East Delhi riots conspiracy case, citing a breach of bail conditions regarding media contact. Imam was ordered to surrender by Saturday evening.
Ratna Singh, legal affairs head of Cockroach Janta Party, filed a plea in a Delhi court seeking an FIR against police personnel for allegedly confining her and preventing her from joining a lawyers' protest in New Delhi.
The Supreme Court ordered authorities not to impose a blanket ban on Delhi metro and train services ahead of a planned CJP protest, ruling that public transport can be regulated but not completely halted.
The Supreme Court Bar Association urged the Chief Justice of India to intervene following the detention of lawyers by Delhi Police during a protest march in New Delhi ahead of a Cockroach Janta Party demonstration.