
US-China AI talks in New York and the Xi-Trump summit established a formal dialogue and hotline, but experts warn that safety concerns for technology and leveraged tech companies require deeper cooperation as AI investment surges and public skepticism grows in the US.
AI-generated summary
US-China AI talks in New York and the Xi-Trump summit led to agreements on a formal AI dialogue and hotline, with a follow-up meeting planned for November.
US-China AI talks must ensure safety of both tech and business
A hotline and an ad hoc dialogue are not enough. Safety concerns are growing for both the technology and leveraged tech companies
Wang Huiyao is the founder of the Centre for China and Globalisation, a Beijing-based non-governmental think tank.
Published: 5:30am, 20 Oct 2026
In New York last month, US-China talks on artificial intelligence opened up a path of cooperation. This was affirmed by the Xi-Trump summit in Washington where both presidents agreed to establish a formal AI dialogue and hotline. With the next AI meeting set to happen in November, it is imperative that both countries further cooperation.
The AI ecosystem is in flux. American tech companies are draining their coffers as they commit vast sums to chips, data centres and energy before the revenue model is even settled. Trillions of dollars are being committed to the AI buildout. While this exposure is not the same as the overleveraging in the mortgage market that triggered the 2008 global financial crisis, a sudden bursting of the AI bubble could have far-reaching consequences.
Much of US economic growth this year has been from AI or AI-enabling companies. Yet, only 38 per cent of Americans saw “more benefits than drawbacks” in AI products and services – well below the global average – against 85 per cent in China, according to the Ipsos AI Monitor 2026. In May, the Ipsos Consumer Tracker found that most Americans would oppose a data centre in their community.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
US-China AI dialogue will produce concrete safety frameworks by early 2027
Possible · Within months

Germany's "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung" commented that Germany has long criticized China's trade imbalances and subsidies, but its own automobile industry also relies on policy support. Now it is turning to trade protection in the face of the impact of China's electric vehicles, which seems hypocritical. The article said that the real way out is to improve its own competitiveness rather than erecting trade barriers. It also quoted the opinion of "Neue Züricher Zeitung" that the West's self-sufficiency in China's rare earths is an illusion, and it should focus on improving its own attractiveness.

Akio Yaita analyzed the "ocean current" phenomenon in the Taipei mayoral election, saying that Shen Boyang's support rate is catching up with Chiang Wanan, which reflects the public's expectations for professional municipal administration, urban reform and security and defense, and is in contrast to the "continuation" of Chiang Wanan's demands.

TSMC Chief Information Officer Lin Hongda proposed an "AI brain" blueprint to transform decades of process experience into AI capabilities. This move aims to shorten the research and development cycle and improve yield rates through knowledge feedback on design, manufacturing and packaging, and promote the transformation of Taiwan's semiconductor industry from a manufacturing base to an industry core with value distribution influence.

Shi Wenyi discussed the Taipei mayoral debate through the perspective of Liu Zhou of the Northern Qi Dynasty, pointing out that although eloquence is not the only governance ability, answering questions head-on and explaining policies is crucial, and questioned Jiang Wanan's rhetorical questioning skills when facing questions.

Democratic Progressive Party legislator Lai Hui-yuan recently asked Taipei 101 Chairman Chia Yongjie to dress "simple" in the Legislative Yuan, triggering criticism of arrogance and gender bias. President Lai Ching-te later issued a statement emphasizing that personal style should be respected, and the incident also triggered a discussion on the professionalism and separation of congressional oversight.

The Legislative Yuan passed the draft amendment to the "Elderly Welfare Law" on the third reading, clearly stipulating that those over 65 years old whose income tax rate does not reach 20% will have the central government to fully subsidize their health insurance premiums. Author Huang Huangshun criticized this as a political check that lacks stable financial resources. The threshold for wealth exclusion is in vain and will increase the burden on the young salaried class and crowd out other social welfare resources.