
美國陸軍新版作戰指引將解放軍視為主要威脅,並將台灣與呂宋海峽納入假設性作戰情境。
美國陸軍發布新版作戰指引《How the Army Fights》,強調面對解放軍威脅,美軍需具備衝突首日即投入作戰的能力。文件將台灣與呂宋海峽列為假設情境,凸顯前沿部署與初期戰場反應對區域嚇阻的重要性。
AI-generated summary
美國陸軍於今年十月發布四十六頁作戰指引《How the Army Fights》。該文件明確將解放軍視為主要軍事威脅,並探討印太地區的兵力部署與作戰情境。
十月二十一日,中央社引述外媒報導,美國陸軍公布新的作戰指引《How the Army Fights》,強調面對中國人民解放軍的軍事挑戰,美軍必須具備衝突爆發首日即可投入作戰的能力。這份由美國陸軍副參謀長拉內夫上將署名、於今年十月發布的四十六頁文件,明確將共軍視為主要軍事威脅,並提出前沿部署、跨領域作戰及持續作戰等重要方向。尤其值得注意的是,文件不僅討論印太地區的兵力部署,還直接以台灣及呂宋海峽作為假設性作戰情境。這顯示美國陸軍對印太衝突的準備,已不再只是遠距離增援的概念,而是更加重視危機發生初期的戰場反應能力。
仔細檢視原始文件,美軍將陸上作戰能力區分為跨領域整合、打擊、近接戰鬥與持續作戰四項要素,並強調第一島鏈前沿部隊必須具備立即反應能力,第二島鏈則須強化燃料、彈藥、醫療及後勤設施。文件中的台灣假設情境,描述部署於菲律賓呂宋島北部的美軍,如何結合長程精準火力、無人攻擊載具及分散式指揮系統,對抗共軍的反介入與區域拒止能力。這項構想反映現代戰爭的重要變化,戰場不再只是單一軍種的火力較量,而是感測、通信、指揮、打擊與後勤相互整合的體系競爭。
這份文件真正值得台灣思考的,是美軍為何如此重視戰爭初期的時間競爭。過去美軍具有強大的跨洋兵力投射能力,但面對共軍長程飛彈、網路攻擊及電子作戰威脅,傳統依賴後方集結、逐步增援的模式,可能面臨更高風險。因此,美軍強調必須事先建立前沿部署、基地使用、空域通行及補給支援條件。試問,如果戰爭爆發後才開始協調基地與運輸路線,再強大的軍隊又如何確保及時抵達?如果前沿部隊能迅速投入作戰,卻缺乏持續補給能力,又能維持多久戰力?同樣道理,台灣不能只期待盟友提供先進武器或軍事支援,更應思考如何在衝突初期保存自身戰力,並維持指揮、通信與後勤體系正常運作。美軍作戰準備可以提高區域嚇阻可信度,但無法取代台灣本身的防衛責任。
從國家安全角度觀察,美國陸軍這份指引傳達的重要訊息,是現代嚇阻不能只依賴戰爭爆發後的增援能力,更須在平時建立足以阻止對手速戰速決的部署條件。對台灣而言,應持續強化聯合情監偵、分散式指揮通信、戰力保存、彈藥儲備與後勤補給韌性,並在既有合作基礎上深化與民主夥伴的安全協調。尤其面對共軍可能採取的快速打擊與封鎖行動,國軍必須具備獨立應處初期危機的能力,才能爭取更有利的戰略時間。美軍願意將共軍威脅納入具體作戰規劃,對區域安全具有重要意義,但真正可靠的嚇阻,從來不是單方面期待盟友一定會來,而是讓潛在侵略者明白,台灣有能力抵抗,美國與區域夥伴也具備介入能力,使其無法確信能以有限代價達成軍事目的。

The Fifth Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing, focusing on "comprehensive and strict governance of the party." Akio Yaita's analysis pointed out that this meeting reflected the institutional dilemma of Xi Jinping's anti-corruption, paved the way for the continuation of the 21st Party Congress in 2027, and was in sharp contrast to the reform direction of the 1981 historical resolution.

Historical analysis of US sanctions policy, comparing Ronald Reagan's 1982 Soviet pipeline sanctions and grain sales to current Treasury-licensed Russian diesel imports ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.

Trump regards the US$14 billion arms sales to Taiwan as a bargaining chip, causing Taiwan to question the determination of US defense. Scholar Ryan Haas pointed out that although U.S.-Taiwan relations have deepened, the political cracks caused by the president's remarks may lead to Beijing's misjudgment. Taiwan should strengthen its substantive defense readiness and deepen cross-party support from the United States.

Young Chinese people are facing severe employment and psychological crises. They hide their unemployment and pretend to work in cafes. At the same time, Putin proposed trilateral talks between China, the United States and Russia, and the German media called on Europe to use trade tools to defend its interests.

This article discusses the testing progress of the domestic submarine "Hai Kun" and emphasizes that the submarine's combat effectiveness depends on system integration and safety verification. The author believes that the technical team should be given professional space, and at the same time, the project progress should be transparent, the quality verification should be accurate, and the contractual responsibilities should be strictly fulfilled to ensure that the Haikun becomes a reliable combat force.

Huida CEO Huang Renxun pointed out that network security is the next major application of AI. Faced with China's long-term cyber intrusion and AI offensive and defensive competition, experts call on Taiwan to actively deploy defensive AI, upgrade the security of key infrastructure, and transform technological advantages into security and industrial competitiveness.