"Nature" publishes genetic research: more than 1,000 genetic variants related to personality are identified
Quick Look
- The international academic journal "Nature" published a genetics paper.
- Through a meta-analysis of more than 1 million participants, researchers identified 1,260 genetic variations related to the five major human personalities, of which 824 were newly discovered.
- However, the author emphasized that DNA cannot directly predict personality, and environmental factors have a greater impact.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Over the past 100 years, many studies have shown that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to personality differences, but identifying genetic traits associated with personality traits is challenging because multiple genes may be involved and requires very large sample sizes of participants.
China News Service, Beijing, September 5 (Reporter Sun Zifa) A recent genetics paper published in the international academic journal "Nature" stated that researchers conducted a meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million participants and identified more than 1,000 genetic variants related to the five major human personalities.
Schematic diagram related to this study. Photo courtesy Springer Nature
The study explored potential links between DNA variants and personality differences, focusing on five personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness to experience. The authors of the paper emphasize that the results of this study do not indicate that DNA can directly predict personality, but suggest that certain variants may affect behavioral traits, although other environmental factors may still have a greater impact on personality development.
The paper introduces that human personality traits can be divided into five major categories, called the "Big Five." Among them, extraversion includes traits such as sociability, decisiveness, and energy levels; agreeableness includes compassion, respect, and trust; conscientiousness includes organization, efficiency, and responsibility; neuroticism includes anxiety, depression, and mood swings; and openness includes imagination, curiosity, and aesthetic sensitivity.
Over the past 100 years, many studies have shown that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to personality differences. However, identifying genetic traits associated with personality traits is challenging because multiple genes may be involved and very large sample sizes of participants are required to establish meaningful associations.
In this study, the first author and co-corresponding author of the paper, Ted Schwaba of Michigan State University, USA, and his collaborators conducted a meta-analysis of the results of genome-wide association studies in 46 cohorts, covering a total of 1.14 million participants. Their analysis found 1,260 genetic variants related to personality, including 824 new variants that had not been previously found to be related to personality.
Further research found that these associations between genetic variation and the Big Five personality traits are complex, with each trait associated with a combination of multiple variations, but applicable to different human groups (such as categories by age or geographic location); approximately 7.4% to 10.6% of the variation in populations for each personality trait is related to measurable genetic variation that is common in the population. However, other factors, such as the environment, can have a strong influence on human personality traits.
The authors of the paper concluded that the findings of this study may be helpful for further research on factors affecting personality. (over)
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Follow-up research will further explore the specific mechanisms between genetic variation and personality traits.
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- How exactly do these genetic variants affect behavioral traits?
- What is the specific mechanism of environmental factors in personality development?
- How applicable are the findings to different cultural contexts?




