
農地贈與配偶無法洗白違規紀錄,再次違規將喪失免徵土地增值稅優惠
澎湖縣政府稅務局提醒,農地違規紀錄會隨贈與過戶合併計算,即便贈與給配偶也無法「歸零」。若農地曾有違規紀錄且改善後再次違規,未來移轉時將無法享有不課徵土地增值稅的優惠。
AI-generated summary
依據《土地稅法》規定,配偶間相互贈與農地時,土地承受人的違規紀錄必須與前手合併計算。
民眾透過買賣或贈與等方式取得農業用地,向稅務機關申請並核准「不課徵土地增值稅」後,並不代表日後就能隨意變更土地用途,澎湖縣政府稅務局也提醒,農地在持有期間仍須持續作農業使用,若曾被查獲違規且未限期改善,或是改善後「再次違規」,日後土地再次移轉時,恐怕就無法繼續享有免課徵土地增值稅的優惠。
許多地主常有迷思,以為將農地贈與給配偶,過去的違規紀錄就能「歸零重算」。對此稅務局澄清,依據《土地稅法》規定,配偶間相互贈與農地時,土地承受人的違規紀錄必須與前手「合併計算」,換句話說,過戶給配偶並不會讓違規紀錄洗白。
稅務局舉例,陳先生名下一筆農地曾被查獲未作農業使用,雖然當時已在期限內完成改善,但隨後他將該農地贈與給妻子,妻子持有期間卻又再次被查獲違規。即便妻子這次同樣限期改善完成,但因合併計算了陳先生過去的違規紀錄,已構成「改善後再次違規」,未來這筆農地若要再次移轉,將無法適用不課徵土地增值稅的規定。
稅務局呼籲,農地免課徵土增稅的初衷是鼓勵農業永續經營。民眾在辦理農地移轉或配偶間贈與前,務必先確認土地實際使用狀況與過往紀錄,切勿因一時疏忽或誤解規定,導致日後移轉時面臨龐大的稅務負擔。

On September 16, the Beihai Maritime Court Qinzhou Tribunal was inaugurated in Qinzhou City, Guangxi. The court will have jurisdiction over maritime and commercial cases in areas such as Qinzhou Port, Fangcheng Port and Pinglu Canal, aiming to provide legal protection for the construction of the New Land-Sea Corridor in the West and port-facing industries. The original Fangchenggang Court has been cancelled, and the Qinzhou Court will accept the case from September 16, 2026.

Former Philippine House of Representatives Speaker Martin Romualdez pleaded not guilty via video link on the 16th to the charge of "plunder" involving a total amount of 7.44 billion pesos, and his lawyer will apply for bail.

The Chinese Human Rights Defenders Network released a report on Wednesday saying that Chinese police and prison administrators continue to use widespread torture and ill-treatment, most of which are related to forced confessions and medical deprivation, and related accusations have largely not been effectively investigated.

Former Kosovo president Hashim Thaci was sentenced to 25 years in prison for war crimes, murder, and torture committed during the 1990s conflict by a Kosovo war crimes tribunal.

Macau's first national security case opened behind closed doors on Wednesday. Pro-democracy leader Au Kam-xin was charged with subversion and other crimes and faced up to 25 years in prison. The trial process was not open to the public, and family members and the media were unable to participate, raising concerns about judicial transparency.

A lawyer surnamed Chen in Taichung was appointed to defend the riders of a fraudulent group, but he passed the investigation documents downloaded from the Judicial Yuan's filing system to the financial backer surnamed Wu through LINE. The Taichung District Court was sentenced to six months in prison and fined 100,000 yuan for violating the personal information law. He can appeal.