
Spouses who donate farmland to their spouses cannot clear their violation records. If they violate the rules again, they will lose the land value-added tax exemption.
AI-generated summary
According to the provisions of the Land Tax Law, when spouses donate agricultural land to each other, the violation record of the land recipient must be combined with that of the previous owner.
People who obtain agricultural land through sale or donation, and apply for and receive "no land value-added tax" from the tax authorities do not mean that they can change the land use at will in the future. The Penghu County Government Taxation Bureau also reminds that agricultural land must continue to be used for agriculture during the period of holding. If it has been found in violation and has not been improved within a time limit, or if it has been "violated again" after improvement, when the land is transferred again in the future, it may not be able to continue to enjoy the exemption of land value-added tax.
Many landowners often have the misconception that by donating farmland to their spouse, past violation records will be reset to zero. In this regard, the tax bureau clarified that according to the provisions of the "Land Tax Law", when spouses donate agricultural land to each other, the violation record of the land recipient must be "aggregated" with the previous owner. In other words, transferring the ownership to the spouse will not clear the violation record.
The tax bureau gave an example. A piece of farmland under Mr. Chen's name was once seized and not used for agriculture. Although improvements were completed within the time limit, he later donated the farmland to his wife. However, while his wife was holding it, it was found to be in violation again. Even if the wife completed the improvements within the same deadline this time, Mr. Chen's past violation records were combined and calculated, which constituted "re-violation after improvement." If the farmland is transferred again in the future, the exemption from land value-added tax will not be applicable.
The tax bureau called on the original intention of exempting agricultural land from land collection and increasing taxes to encourage sustainable agricultural operations. Before transferring agricultural land or making a gift between spouses, people must first confirm the actual use status and past records of the land. Do not face huge tax burdens when transferring in the future due to temporary negligence or misunderstanding of the regulations.

On September 16, the Beihai Maritime Court Qinzhou Tribunal was inaugurated in Qinzhou City, Guangxi. The court will have jurisdiction over maritime and commercial cases in areas such as Qinzhou Port, Fangcheng Port and Pinglu Canal, aiming to provide legal protection for the construction of the New Land-Sea Corridor in the West and port-facing industries. The original Fangchenggang Court has been cancelled, and the Qinzhou Court will accept the case from September 16, 2026.

Former Philippine House of Representatives Speaker Martin Romualdez pleaded not guilty via video link on the 16th to the charge of "plunder" involving a total amount of 7.44 billion pesos, and his lawyer will apply for bail.

The Chinese Human Rights Defenders Network released a report on Wednesday saying that Chinese police and prison administrators continue to use widespread torture and ill-treatment, most of which are related to forced confessions and medical deprivation, and related accusations have largely not been effectively investigated.

Former Kosovo president Hashim Thaci was sentenced to 25 years in prison for war crimes, murder, and torture committed during the 1990s conflict by a Kosovo war crimes tribunal.

Macau's first national security case opened behind closed doors on Wednesday. Pro-democracy leader Au Kam-xin was charged with subversion and other crimes and faced up to 25 years in prison. The trial process was not open to the public, and family members and the media were unable to participate, raising concerns about judicial transparency.

A lawyer surnamed Chen in Taichung was appointed to defend the riders of a fraudulent group, but he passed the investigation documents downloaded from the Judicial Yuan's filing system to the financial backer surnamed Wu through LINE. The Taichung District Court was sentenced to six months in prison and fined 100,000 yuan for violating the personal information law. He can appeal.