
台北市長選舉首場電視辯論會因舉辦場次與日期分歧而卡關,蔣萬安陣營指沈伯洋臨陣脫逃,沈伯洋則強調日期不是問題,僅想確認場數與主題分配,並坦言未特別為辯論做準備,引發網友討論。
AI-generated summary
台北市長選舉將進行首場電視辯論會,由TVBS和三立聯合舉辦,蔣萬安與沈伯洋團隊正協商細節,但因舉辦場次與日期意見分歧而陷入僵局。
民進黨台北市長參選人沈伯洋。(記者田裕華攝)
首次上稿 10-12 23:19
更新時間 10-13 06:23
台北市長選舉首場電視辯論會能否辦成受到各界關注,尋求連任的蔣萬安總算答應由《TVBS》和《三立》聯合舉辦,昨天(12日)派人和對手沈伯洋的團隊協商細節,目前因「舉辦場次」和「舉辦日期」意見分歧而卡關,蔣陣營事後跳出來說沈伯洋「臨陣脫逃」。不過沈伯洋再次強調,日期並不是問題,而是想確認有幾場辯論好分配主題;此外,當被問有沒有為辯論做好準備時,沈伯洋坦言「沒有特別做準備」,引發網友熱議。
請繼續往下閱讀...
蔣萬安和沈伯洋的團隊今天下午就首場電視辯論會,與TVBS、三立協商討論逾1小時。蔣萬安陣營事後宣稱,沈伯洋的人糾結在要舉辦幾場,連首場舉辦日期都拿不定主意,得回去請示,先前喊辯論喊得震天價響,真的到了協商卻臨陣脫逃,企圖營造沈伯洋想拖延辯論,還有藍白粉跟著酸沈伯洋「大烙賽」。
對此,沈伯洋本人和團隊都發聲回應,強調隨時都可以與蔣萬安辯論,日期並不是問題,他們反倒希望越快舉辦越好,主要是想確認有幾場,主題應該怎麼分配,當然蔣萬安不想分配也沒關係,現在就能馬上出來針對市政來交鋒。
另外,沈伯洋昨天受訪被記者詢問有沒有為辯論先做準備?沈伯洋露出有些納悶的表情,反問記者:「妳說辯論的準備是什麼意思?」記者表示:「例如說市政啊,或是現在有一些爭議的部分。」沈伯洋回應:「喔喔喔……沒有。因為我本來就做好整個選舉的準備了,所以對我來講就只是要把我們跟市民溝通的東西,拿去跟蔣市長討論,所以我們沒有特別去準備,原來這個是要準備的……我覺得應該是要做好市政的準備啦。」
這段訪問隨後被分享到Threads上,吸引數萬人按讚,「雖然他沒有故意想酸,但聽起來就是好酸」、「其實這是沈伯洋的真心話,要用英文辯論也沒問題」、「這就是那個說自己沒有熬夜準備考試,結果都考第一名那位」、「他只是把他一直研究消化過的拿出來講而已」、「他就是那種平常有在認真上課讀書的學霸,考前看大家都在讀書,他應該也一臉疑惑大家到底在讀什麼一樣」、「原來日常的工作在對手眼裡是需要『準備』。」
在 Threads 查看
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
台北市長選舉首場電視辯論會將在近日內舉辦
Likely · Within days

U.S. federal judge Reyes issued an emergency order on the 12th to suspend tree felling at the East Potomac Golf Course in Washington. This move responded to environmentalists' concerns that about 500 trees have been cut down and authorities plan to cut down hundreds more trees. The judge determined that removing hundreds of trees would have permanent effects and scheduled an emergency hearing that morning to discuss the Trump administration's failure to provide reasonable advance notice.

During the Legislative Yuan’s general policy inquiry, Chen Qinglong, the general convenor of the Popular Party Caucus, questioned the Executive Yuan’s failure to propose amendments to the Military Treatment Ordinance and the Police Personnel Ordinance within six months. Executive President Zhuo Yongtai responded that the government had submitted the amendments to the Legislative Yuan before the end of September, and emphasized that the interpretation of the constitution will not affect the proposal of the Executive Yuan version of the amendments, and the two do not conflict.

Huang Shanshan posted on the social media that the 340,000 votes she received in the 2022 Taipei mayoral election do not belong to any political party or figure, emphasizing that votes always belong to the people. The third force refers to the median voters who are willing to use their votes to determine the future, rather than specific political parties or organizations.

The Kuomintang group of the Legislative Yuan pointed out that the land where Taoyuan mayoral candidate Huang Shijie of the Democratic Progressive Party held a campaign event in Zhongli on October 3 belongs to the state-owned property of the Farmland and Water Conservancy Administration of the Ministry of Agriculture. It questioned that it was illegally occupied without applying in accordance with the law. It also asked the Ministry of Agriculture to disclose the application form, official approval documents, lease contracts and payment receipts. It also questioned whether Huang Shijie's father Huang Huangde pressured civil servants, and accused him of using public resources to bribe elections.

The People's Party held a press conference to respond to the Songshan Airport relocation proposal. Party Secretary-General Hong Yuxiang and legislator Xu Zhongxin expressed their support for the general direction of relocation, but emphasized that the project cannot be completed by the Taipei City Government alone. It requires the coordination of inter-ministerial committees such as the Ministry of Transportation, the Ministry of the Interior, and the Ministry of National Defense. They called on the central and local governments to plan well to achieve better results, and criticized the inappropriate use of issues to shout slogans at an election time.

DPP Taichung mayoral candidate He Xinchun said that he has signed invitations for three Taichung mayoral TV debates hosted by five media outlets. He emphasized that Taichung is not inferior to Taipei and that citizens deserve to see the debates. He also called on his opponent Jiang Qichen to agree to participate in the same debates to openly debate municipal administration and vision and accept the test of citizens.