The White House Committee questioned the amendment of the law on the treatment of military and police officers and got away with it with a written report. Zhuo Rongtai: It was sent to the Legislative Yuan at the end of September

The Legislative Yuan will continue its general policy inquiry this morning. Chen Qinglong, the general convenor of the Popular Party Caucus, asked that the Executive Yuan promised half a year ago that it would propose regulations on the treatment of military personnel and personnel regulations on police personnel within six months. The Political Yuan version of the amendments is now being reported in writing. Is it to muddle through and pretend to be false? Executive President Zhuo Rongtai said that the Executive Yuan has submitted the government's specific actions to strengthen the protection of the military, public and education to the Legislative Yuan before the end of September.

Chen Qinglong questioned that according to the results of the Legislative Yuan caucus negotiation on April 15, the Executive Yuan should propose relevant amendments to the military treatment regulations, police personnel personnel regulations, and other related military, public and educational safeguards within six months after this year’s central government general budget is submitted to committee.

Please read on...

Zhuo Rongtai said that the original coordination was to propose actions within six months. The government's specific actions to strengthen the protection of the military, public and education, the Executive Yuan has submitted to the Legislative Yuan before the end of September. Since the justice has been asked to interpret the constitution, in the future, the results of the interpretation will be released, or the law will be revised based on the safeguards. There should be a consultation mechanism between the two houses.

In this regard, Chen Qinglong said that the interpretation of the Constitution will not affect the proposal of the Political Yuan version. The interpretation of the Constitution is the interpretation of the Constitution. There is no conflict between the two. Regarding the retirement regulations for public education personnel, the Political Yuan also proposed a constitutional interpretation, which was later implemented and reissued. However, the military, police and police used the constitutional interpretation to prevaricate the regulations, turning it into two sets of standards. They have all devoted their lives to the country, and there is a gap between the Executive Yuan's actions.

Zhuo Rongtai responded: "No, they are all consistent." Please take a detailed look at the specific actions of the military, civil and educational personnel. In the past, we have reasonably adjusted the treatment of military, civil and educational personnel, and to what extent our funds have been used. All military, civil and educational personnel are not treated equally as in the revised law. We have already taken the proposed actions as promised in time and strengthened the content of adjusting the actual past treatment of various types of military, police and police personnel. This is already very close to the content of the revised law.