Court: Forging medical documents to defraud public property constitutes a crime of fraud. One year in prison suspended for one year and a fine of 5,000 yuan.
AI-generated summary
The maternity insurance fund is a social insurance fund established by the state to protect the basic living and medical needs of female employees during childbirth. The application must be based on the true facts of childbirth and abortion. Zhu had previously received maternity benefits legally based on true abortion medical records. Later, because he felt it was "convenient to get money," he became greedy and began to forge materials to apply for it multiple times.
The maternity insurance fund is a social insurance fund established by the state to protect the basic living and medical needs of female employees during childbirth. The application must be based on the true facts of childbirth and abortion. This is a support fund set up by the state to protect employees' reproductive rights, but some people have evil thoughts about it.
Zhu, who lives in Shanghai, forged medical documents, fabricated miscarriage experiences, and defrauded maternity insurance funds eight times in two months. Recently, the Shanghai Minhang District People's Court concluded the case.
After successfully applying for maternity benefits, I thought it was “convenient to get money”
The defendant Zhu confessed that in 2025, she saw a video on the Internet and learned that "you can apply for maternity insurance funds online after a miscarriage." She legally received maternity benefits based on her true previous abortion medical records. This made her feel that it was "convenient to get money" and she actually became greedy.
The court found that from December 30, 2025 to January 19, 2026, Zhu forged medical treatment materials five times and successfully defrauded maternity insurance funds totaling more than 30,000 yuan.
From January 23 to February 24, 2026, Zhu forged materials three more times to apply for maternity insurance funds totaling more than 19,000 yuan, but failed because he failed to pass the review.
On February 26, 2026, the case was solved and Zhu was arrested by the public security agency. After arriving at the case, Zhu truthfully confessed his crime and withdrew all illegal gains.
Being held criminally responsible for committing fraud
From legal application to forging certificates and fabricating miscarriage records to defraud maternity benefits, what is the price?
Judge Ma Chengui of the Criminal Tribunal of the People's Court of Minhang District, Shanghai, who is presiding over the case, said that in this case, Zhu forged medical documents, fabricated birth facts, and submitted multiple applications to the "One-online All-in-One" system to defraud the maternity insurance fund. This was a method of defrauding public property by fabricating facts and concealing the truth, and the amount was relatively large, which met the constituent elements of the crime of fraud. The more than 19,000 yuan that has not yet been obtained is an attempted crime. Together with his confession, admission of guilt, and withdrawal of all illegal gains, the court finally sentenced him to one year in prison, suspended for one year, and fined him 5,000 yuan.
"One-stop service" leaves traces throughout the process
Breaking the law will be discovered sooner or later
The starting point of this case was a completely legal claim, and the turning point occurred after the defendant thought it was "too convenient to get money." This reminds all insured persons that they should distinguish the boundaries between legality and illegality from the beginning.
Ma Chengui reminded that true and valid supporting materials must be provided truthfully.
Ma Chengui: Insured persons should apply for maternity insurance benefits based on the true facts of childbirth or miscarriage, and remain vigilant against the so-called "multiple claim strategies" on the Internet. Any fraud will leave traces and it is difficult to escape legal prosecution.
Huo Wei, assistant judge of the Criminal Tribunal of the Minhang District People's Court of Shanghai, emphasized that one must cherish personal credit and never lose big for small things.
Huo Wei: In the process of using "one-stop processing", every declaration is fully traceable and well-documented. The system can identify abnormal situations such as multiple applications in a short period of time. In this case, Zhu’s subsequent applications were blocked because of the functioning of the review mechanism.
In just two months, Zhu applied for maternity benefits 8 times, of which 5 were successful. How can convenience services prevent "false hands"?
Ma Chengui: Preventing the "hands of counterfeiting" requires coordinated efforts from all parties to continuously improve the process. Handling agencies need to further strengthen and improve the verification of the authenticity of medical documents and medical records, promote data sharing and cross-reference with medical institutions, and set up automatic early warnings and key verifications for abnormal situations such as multiple applications in a short period of time; online platforms should fulfill their content management responsibilities and promptly clean up the information about "collecting" and "handling" social security benefits on behalf of others.
Reporter丨Sun Ying
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The handling agency will strengthen the verification of the authenticity of medical documents and medical records, and promote data sharing and cross-comparison with medical institutions.
Likely · Within months
Online platforms will clean up information about “receiving” and “handling” social security benefits on behalf of others
Possible · Within months

Chinese lawmakers are proposing to restrict residential surveillance at a designated location (RSDL), a contentious detention and police surveillance measure introduced in 1996 and expanded in 2012, which has become the harshest form of detention used in state security cases including terrorism.

Chinese lawmakers are proposing to restrict residential surveillance at a designated location (RSDL), a contentious detention and police surveillance measure under the Criminal Procedure Law. Originally introduced in 1996 as a mild restriction to reduce detention and arrest rates, RSDL expanded in 2012 and has since become the harshest form of detention used in state security cases, including terrorism.

Australian food safety inspections have introduced the body-worn video and audio system (BWV), which requires investigators to turn on the system immediately after entering the scene and inform the subject of the inspection, transforming human interaction into a forensic field, protecting the rights and interests of law enforcement officers and subjects with real-time, complete, and untamperable audio and video data, and improving the credibility and traceability of the system.

A man surnamed Wu in Tainan City was reported by his neighbors 17 times for "not using turn signals in accordance with regulations" in just 12 days from August 17 to 29 last year, and was fined more than 20,000 yuan. The Kaohsiung High Administrative Court found that the whistleblower’s long-term and targeted evidence collection was for improper purposes and ruled to revoke the original punishment.

On March 15, 2022, a woman surnamed Ying left her luggage in the car when she got off the bus in Liugui District, Kaohsiung. The passenger driver closed the door and drove away without noticing. The woman Ying fell while chasing the car and was beaten, causing serious injuries such as facial fractures and concussion. He lost the case in the first instance. In the second instance, the Kaohsiung High Court found that the driver was at fault and had a causal relationship with the injury. It changed the verdict to jointly and severally compensate the passenger transport company and the driver more than 220,000 yuan. It also determined that the woman was 40% responsible and the passenger transport company was 60% responsible based on the offset of negligence. The whole case was settled.

Britain's Prince Harry, Elton John and Elizabeth Hurley have applied to the court for permission to appeal, trying to revive a privacy infringement lawsuit against the parent company of the Daily Mail that was previously dismissed by the London High Court. The move contrasts with Harry's recent remarks that he wanted to "end a chapter" with the British media.