法院:伪造医学文书骗取公共财物构成诈骗罪,一年有期徒刑缓刑一年并处罚金五千元
上海市民朱某在两个月内伪造医学文书、虚构流产经历,先后8次申领生育保险基金,其中5次得手骗取3万多元,3次因审核未通过未遂涉及1.9万多元。2026年2月26日案件侦破,朱某被抓获后如实供述并退出全部违法所得。上海市闵行区人民法院判处其有期徒刑一年、缓刑一年,并处罚金五千元。
AI-generated summary
生育保险基金是国家为保障女职工在生育期间的基本生活和医疗需求而设立的社会保险基金,申领须以真实的生育、流产事实为前提。朱某此前凭真实流产就医记录合法领取过生育金,后因觉得“来钱方便”而产生贪念,开始伪造材料多次申领。
生育保险基金是国家为保障女职工在生育期间的基本生活和医疗需求而设立的社会保险基金,申领须以真实的生育、流产事实为前提。这是国家为了保障职工生育权益而设立的托底钱,但是有人却对此动起了歪心思。
家住上海的朱某在两个月的时间里伪造医学文书,虚构流产经历,先后8次诈骗生育保险基金。近日,上海市闵行区人民法院审结此案。
申领生育金成功后以为“来钱方便”
被告人朱某供述,2025年,她在网上刷到一条视频,得知“流产后可以在线申领生育保险基金”。她依据自己此前的真实流产就医记录,合法领取了生育金。这让她觉得“来钱方便”,竟然生出贪念。
法院审理查明:2025年12月30日至2026年1月19日,朱某先后5次伪造就诊材料,成功骗取生育保险基金共计3万多元。
2026年1月23日至2月24日,朱某又3次伪造材料申领,欲申领生育保险基金合计1.9万多元,因审核未通过而未能得逞。
2026年2月26日,案件侦破,朱某被公安机关抓获。到案后,朱某如实供述自己的罪行,并退出全部违法所得。
构成诈骗被追究刑事责任
从合法申领到伪造凭证,虚构流产记录骗领生育金,究竟要付出什么代价?
主审此案的上海市闵行区人民法院刑事审判庭法官马晨贵介绍,本案中,朱某伪造医学文书、虚构生育事实,先后多次向“一网通办”系统提交申请,骗取生育保险基金,属于以虚构事实、隐瞒真相的方法骗取公共财物,且数额较大,符合诈骗罪的构成要件。尚未得手的一万九千多元系犯罪未遂。连同坦白、认罪认罚、退出全部违法所得等情节,法院最终判处其有期徒刑一年、缓刑一年,并处罚金五千元。
“一网通办”全程留痕
违法迟早被发现
本案的起点是一次完全合法的申领,转折发生在被告人认为“来钱太方便”之后。这提醒所有参保人,从一开始便应分清合法与违法的边界。
马晨贵提示,要如实提供真实、有效的证明材料。
马晨贵:参保人员应当基于真实的生育或流产事实申领生育保险待遇,对网上所谓的“多次申领攻略”保持警惕,任何弄虚作假的行为都将留下痕迹,难以逃脱法律的追究。
上海市闵行区人民法院刑事审判庭法官助理火伟强调,要珍惜个人信用,切勿因小失大。
火伟:使用“一网通办”过程中,每笔申报都是全程留痕、有据可查的,短期内多次申领这种异常情形,系统可以识别出来。本案中,朱某后面几次申请被拦下,就是审核机制发挥作用的结果。
朱某在短短两个月时间里,8次申领生育金,其中得手5次,便民服务如何防住“造假之手”?
马晨贵:防住“造假之手”,需要各方协同发力,不断完善流程。经办机构需进一步加强和完善对医学文书、就诊记录真实性的核验,推动与医疗机构的数据共享和交叉比对,对短期内多次申领等异常情形设置自动预警、重点核查;网络平台应履行内容管理责任,及时清理“代领”“代办”社保待遇的引流信息。
记者丨孙莹
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
经办机构将加强对医学文书、就诊记录真实性的核验,并推动与医疗机构的数据共享和交叉比对
Likely · Within months
网络平台将清理“代领”“代办”社保待遇的引流信息
Possible · Within months

Chinese lawmakers are proposing to restrict residential surveillance at a designated location (RSDL), a contentious detention and police surveillance measure introduced in 1996 and expanded in 2012, which has become the harshest form of detention used in state security cases including terrorism.

Chinese lawmakers are proposing to restrict residential surveillance at a designated location (RSDL), a contentious detention and police surveillance measure under the Criminal Procedure Law. Originally introduced in 1996 as a mild restriction to reduce detention and arrest rates, RSDL expanded in 2012 and has since become the harshest form of detention used in state security cases, including terrorism.

Australian food safety inspections have introduced the body-worn video and audio system (BWV), which requires investigators to turn on the system immediately after entering the scene and inform the subject of the inspection, transforming human interaction into a forensic field, protecting the rights and interests of law enforcement officers and subjects with real-time, complete, and untamperable audio and video data, and improving the credibility and traceability of the system.

A man surnamed Wu in Tainan City was reported by his neighbors 17 times for "not using turn signals in accordance with regulations" in just 12 days from August 17 to 29 last year, and was fined more than 20,000 yuan. The Kaohsiung High Administrative Court found that the whistleblower’s long-term and targeted evidence collection was for improper purposes and ruled to revoke the original punishment.

On March 15, 2022, a woman surnamed Ying left her luggage in the car when she got off the bus in Liugui District, Kaohsiung. The passenger driver closed the door and drove away without noticing. The woman Ying fell while chasing the car and was beaten, causing serious injuries such as facial fractures and concussion. He lost the case in the first instance. In the second instance, the Kaohsiung High Court found that the driver was at fault and had a causal relationship with the injury. It changed the verdict to jointly and severally compensate the passenger transport company and the driver more than 220,000 yuan. It also determined that the woman was 40% responsible and the passenger transport company was 60% responsible based on the offset of negligence. The whole case was settled.

Britain's Prince Harry, Elton John and Elizabeth Hurley have applied to the court for permission to appeal, trying to revive a privacy infringement lawsuit against the parent company of the Daily Mail that was previously dismissed by the London High Court. The move contrasts with Harry's recent remarks that he wanted to "end a chapter" with the British media.