
In a lawsuit filed by a former postal worker who had been fired for driving under the influence, the Fukuoka District Court invalidated the dismissal and ordered him to pay his unpaid wages.
In a lawsuit filed by a former postal worker who was fired for driving under the influence, the Fukuoka District Court ruled on the 3rd to invalidate the dismissal as an "abuse of disciplinary power" and order Japan Post to pay unpaid wages.
AI-generated summary
A former post office employee has filed a lawsuit against Japan Post seeking to invalidate his disciplinary dismissal for driving under the influence of alcohol and to pay him unpaid wages.
On the 3rd, the Fukuoka District Court handed down a ruling in a lawsuit filed by a former post office worker in his 40s who had been punished with disciplinary dismissal and reduced retirement allowance for driving under the influence of alcohol, seeking to have the punishment revoked. Presiding Judge Hiroshi Yokoyama found the dismissal to be an ``abuse of disciplinary power'' and invalidated the dismissal, ordering Japan Post to pay unpaid wages and other unpaid wages.
According to the ruling, in February 2023, when the man was acting as a section manager at a post office in Fukuoka City, he drank one bottle of shochu high and three glasses of shochu mixed with water and went to bed. The next morning, about nine and a half hours later, the driver took his foot off the brake pedal, causing a rear-end collision, and his breath was detected at 0.53 milligrams of alcohol per liter of breath.
He was referred to the public prosecutor's office on suspicion of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving under the influence of alcohol), but the charges were dismissed (the charges were not sufficient).
Japan Post's internal regulations stipulate that anyone who intentionally drinks and drives will be subject to disciplinary dismissal or suspension. At issue in the trial was whether the dismissal was appropriate.
Presiding Judge Yokoyama pointed out that the man's actions showed no attempt to avoid drunk driving, and that this was consistent with the man's understanding that he was not aware that he had "leftover alcohol." ``We cannot find that the driver had any intention to drive while intoxicated, even if it was intentional.''
Furthermore, it cannot be said that alcohol played a role in the occurrence of the accident, and Japan Post has determined that the person does not fall under the category of ``person who caused a traffic accident by driving under the influence of alcohol'' as defined in its internal regulations. It was concluded that the decision to dismiss him as a disciplinary measure was invalid as it violated the company's disciplinary regulations.
Yuki Nishino, the man's attorney, said, ``While eradicating drunk driving is important, this is a significant judgment that shows that we should be cautious about imposing the significant disadvantage of disciplinary dismissal.''
In response to the ruling, Japan Post commented, ``We are truly disappointed and plan to appeal.This fact is extremely serious, as the driver was driving under the influence of alcohol with a high level of alcohol, not to mention causing an accident that resulted in personal injury.''
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Implementation of appeal procedures by Japan Post
Very likely · Within days

It has been revealed that an Osaka High Court clerk mistakenly added about 6,000 unrelated lawyers and court staff to a group on the online conferencing system ``Teams'' when sharing civil trial materials. The group was deleted before the materials were uploaded, and no information leaks have been confirmed.

The Supreme Court has decided to dismiss the former private school teacher's appeal in a lawsuit filed by a former private school teacher who was fired for indecent acts against students, seeking to have his teaching license revoked without a reinvestigation. The second instance judgment that the disposition was legal has become final.

Regarding the Nagoya District Court's decision to deny bail to a defendant accused of stealing a stuffed animal, the Supreme Court's 2nd Petty Bench ruled that the bail was illegal as the defendant did not show any substantive reason for fearing that he would destroy the criminal evidence.

The first trial of five oil marketing companies, including Higashi Nippon Usami, who were accused of violating the Antimonopoly Act in a pricing cartel case involving the sale of diesel oil to corporations in Tokyo, was held on the 3rd at the Tokyo District Court, and all five companies admitted to the charges. Prosecutors pointed out that the price was agreed upon at regular meetings.
On September 1, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an opinion in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in a copyright infringement lawsuit involving OpenAI, stating that reproduction of copyrighted materials in LLM studies constitutes fair use. There are concerns about the stagnation in AI development and the country's advantage over competing countries.

The National Police Agency's panel of experts has recommended the introduction of a system to remotely capture and analyze smartphone communications as a measure against anonymous and mobile criminal groups. We are calling for a process to obtain a court warrant, limited to serious crime prevention, with consideration given to the confidentiality of communications as stipulated in the Constitution.