
Antimonopoly law violation case regarding diesel oil sales to corporations in Tokyo, Tokyo District Court
AI-generated summary
A case in which oil sales companies are said to have formed a price cartel over the sale of diesel oil to transport companies and other corporations in Tokyo.
The Tokyo District Court (presiding judge Naoyuki Fukushima) held the first trial on the 3rd for five oil marketing companies, including East Japan Usami (Tokyo), who were charged with violating the Antimonopoly Act (unfair restraint of trade) in a price cartel case involving the sale of diesel oil to corporations such as transporters in Tokyo, and all five companies admitted to the charges.
Other companies charged with the same crime are ENEOS Wing (Nagoya City), Enex Fleet (Osaka City), Kitaseki (Miyagi Prefecture), and Kyoei Sekiyu (Tokyo). No charges have been filed against the individuals in charge.
In their opening statement, prosecutors pointed out that the industry had been holding regional meetings called "F meetings" since around November 2012 at the latest, to discuss average sales prices and the content of negotiations with customers. He said that since October 2019 in the Tokyo metropolitan area, sales representatives from a total of eight companies, including five companies, have been meeting monthly in a private room at a restaurant in what they call a "central meeting."
In some cases, companies that sold products at low prices contrary to the agreement were required to make corrections. In February last year, when the Fair Trade Commission conducted on-site inspections in Nagano Prefecture, it was revealed that the format was changed from meetings to telephone calls to reach consensus.
During the examination of evidence, reports from executives and sales representatives from each company were read out, with statements such as, ``We felt we had no choice but to deal with customers who have strong bargaining power,'' and ``It had become common knowledge in the industry that our senses were paralyzed.''
According to the indictment, between October and December 2024, representatives from the five companies agreed to increase the price of diesel oil sold to transport companies and other companies under corporate contracts, or to limit the amount of price reduction.

It has been revealed that an Osaka High Court clerk mistakenly added about 6,000 unrelated lawyers and court staff to a group on the online conferencing system ``Teams'' when sharing civil trial materials. The group was deleted before the materials were uploaded, and no information leaks have been confirmed.

The Supreme Court has decided to dismiss the former private school teacher's appeal in a lawsuit filed by a former private school teacher who was fired for indecent acts against students, seeking to have his teaching license revoked without a reinvestigation. The second instance judgment that the disposition was legal has become final.

In a lawsuit filed by a former postal worker who was fired for driving under the influence, the Fukuoka District Court ruled on the 3rd to invalidate the dismissal as an "abuse of disciplinary power" and order Japan Post to pay unpaid wages.

Regarding the Nagoya District Court's decision to deny bail to a defendant accused of stealing a stuffed animal, the Supreme Court's 2nd Petty Bench ruled that the bail was illegal as the defendant did not show any substantive reason for fearing that he would destroy the criminal evidence.
On September 1, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an opinion in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in a copyright infringement lawsuit involving OpenAI, stating that reproduction of copyrighted materials in LLM studies constitutes fair use. There are concerns about the stagnation in AI development and the country's advantage over competing countries.

The National Police Agency's panel of experts has recommended the introduction of a system to remotely capture and analyze smartphone communications as a measure against anonymous and mobile criminal groups. We are calling for a process to obtain a court warrant, limited to serious crime prevention, with consideration given to the confidentiality of communications as stipulated in the Constitution.