
A research team at Kobe University in Japan announced the results of a trolley dilemma experiment in which more than 30% of participants changed their judgments after hearing ChatGPT's logical rebuttal, warning that AI can have a negligible impact on people's values and judgment.
AI-generated summary
The Trolley Dilemma is a thought experiment that presents the situation of a trolley with broken brakes and asks a moral judgment about whether the minority can be sacrificed to save the majority. It appears in Michael Sandel's book 'What is Justice?'
After presenting the ‘Trolley Dilemma’, ChatGPT persuaded… “AI also affects people’s values”
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Kim Byeong-gyu = A study conducted by Japanese researchers showed that artificial intelligence (AI) is more influential than actual people in changing human judgment.
According to the Tokyo Shimbun on the 23rd, Professor Kohei Matsumoto's research team at Kobe University published a paper containing the results of a study showing that more than 30% of people reverse their judgment when presented with a counterargument from AI regarding a moral issue for which there is no correct answer.
The research team asked 56 young people aged 19 to 28 and 74 elderly people aged 65 or older to give their opinions on the so-called 'Trolley's Dilemma'.
The Trolley's Dilemma presents the situation of a trolley with broken brakes and asks whether the minority can be sacrificed to save the majority. It appears in Michael Sandel's international bestseller 'What is Justice?'
The research team asked what choice they would make when there were five people in front of the track of a runaway trolley (coal mine cart) due to a broken brake, and one person on the track when the track was changed.
The generative AI chat GPT made logical rebuttals to the answers submitted by the research participants, and more than 30% of the participants overturned their judgment after reading the rebuttals. Even when the same experiment was conducted after presenting different problems to participants, the proportion of people who changed their judgments was similar.
The less confident one was in one's judgment, the more likely it was that the older age group would change their judgment than the younger age group.
Professor Matsumoto explained, "The rate of people accepting advice from others is around 20-30%, but in this study, as many as 30% of the participants changed their judgment to the exact opposite due to AI's persuasion. This means that AI can have a non-negligible influence on moral judgment."
The research team also warned, “AI can affect people’s values and judgments,” and “there are concerns that it will be abused for the spread of false information and manipulation of public opinion.”
In fact, a research team at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne recently conducted an experiment in which 900 people aged 18 or older in the United States were mixed with AI to discuss pros and cons on topics. The AI, which knew personal information such as the participants' gender and age, was superior to humans in changing the participants' judgments.
The Kobe University research team emphasized, "There is a possibility that AI's persuasiveness will be further increased if information on SNS's contribution history is obtained, so there is a need to prepare measures to prevent abuse."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
If AI is used for personalized persuasion, concerns about value manipulation will become a reality.
Possible · Within months

An MIT study found that 95% of generative AI pilot projects failed to achieve tangible bottom-line improvements, and Gartner predicted that 30% of employees replaced by AI will be rehired by 2029. Experts advised that AI should be designed as a collaboration partner, not just a cost-saving tool.

OpenAI announced that it plans to allow external organizations to conduct technical safety assessments throughout the entire process of training, evaluation, and deployment of AI models. This is a step forward from the previous pre-launch safety assessment, with independence, scientific rigor, security practices, and accountability presented as key priorities. Competitor Antropic is also introducing similar safety measures.

Tajikistan's AI Committee vice-chair Najima Noyovtova said in an interview held in Seoul that a Central Asian AI base can be built by combining Korea's technological prowess with Tajikistan's clean energy, and proposed expanding cooperation between the two countries through the Korea-Thailand IT park project and the AI free zone initiative being promoted by KOICA.

Tom Siegel, former vice president of trust and safety at Google, took office as executive director of the Youth AI Safety Research Institute, warning that AI is more harmful to children and adolescents than social media, and presented suicide, mental illness, and cognitive outsourcing as examples of serious harm.

Antropic and OpenAI unveiled 'Claude Opus 5.5' and 'GPT-6 Sol·Luna' respectively, competing for cost-effective models that maintain or improve performance and lower costs. This is analyzed as a strategy to defend market share and increase sales ahead of the IPO while insisting on speed control.

Kakao Map collaborated with Busan City and the Busan Festival Organizing Committee to release a map dedicated to the 2026 Busan International Rock Festival. Toss received the Prime Minister's Award for its contribution to youth policy, Tada officially launched a regular reservation service, and Thanks Carbon and LG Chem announced the results of the Blue Forest Project at the Korea Social Value Festa 2026.