
AI-generated summary
After the 2008 financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic, public subsidies for local sports facilities declined, pushing cities and states to cut spending. This created a void filled by the private sector, notably private equity firms, who saw an opportunity in the continued demand from families for organized sporting activities for their children.
In the United States, youth sports have become a very attractive market for investors. The problem is that the cost of this practice for families sometimes becomes difficult to bear, at the start of the 2026 school year. According to the Aspen Institute, youth sport represents a market of 40 billion dollars per year. It's gigantic. On average, a family spends more than $1,000 per child on sports, a cost that increased by 46% between 2019 and 2024.
Obviously not all sports cost the same, with ice hockey, for example, being particularly expensive. But, in all cases, you have to pay for registration fees, equipment, travel to tournaments or, occasionally, private coaches. One explanation for this increase in costs is the reduction in subsidies after the 2008 financial crisis, when cities and states had to cut corners. Same thing after Covid: the local equivalent of the MJC could no longer accommodate as many children as before. An opportunity therefore presented itself for the private sector.
Private equity firms understood that parents wanted their children to continue playing sports. They therefore bought structures, created clubs and set up an entire ecosystem. Clubs often offer children aged 10 or 11 spectacular training conditions, bordering on professional. But these conditions come at a cost, since the companies that finance the installations are there to make a profit.
In The New Yorker magazine, a former lacrosse coach sums up how it works: everything belongs to the investors, from the clubs to the equipment to be purchased, including the stadiums, but also the hotels located next to the stadiums. Hotels in which the child's family is required to stay during a tournament, by booking on a platform which also belongs to the investor. We call this “Stay to Play”.
Chris Murphy, a senator from Connecticut, recounted his own experience. He was filming his son's hockey game live on his phone so his family could watch. He was told he had to stop or the team would be punished. To watch the match, his family had to subscribe to a streaming site for $15 a month. A site which belongs to the firm which also owns the ice rink.
So why do parents accept this system? Two main reasons. First, they do not want to deprive their children of organized sports, rather than just letting them play ball in a park. Then it's still a question of money. College is very expensive in the United States and many parents rely on a scholarship.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
US states could introduce legislation to regulate or ban practices like 'Stay to Play' in youth sports tournaments.
Possible · Within months

The Belgian group Rossel, owner of La Voix du Nord, has entered into exclusive negotiations to buy the parent company of the regional daily Sud Ouest by the end of the year, which would create a new giant of the French regional press with a cumulative turnover of more than 400 million euros.

The technician responsible for Donald Trump's teleprompter was ordered to pay a $172,000 fine after betting on the US president's speeches to which he had access in advance, pocketing more than $100,000 in winnings. Furthermore, the boss of Crédit Mutuel, Daniel Baal, warned of the soaring cost of French debt, warning that the banks, the main lenders of the State, would be threatened in the event of France's default.

The European savings barometer reveals that the French have cumulative savings higher than the European average (99,171 euros compared to 85,055) but save the least each month (465 euros), favoring financial security and traditional products like the Livret A, to the detriment of higher returns.

The president of Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, Daniel Baal, declared Tuesday on France 5 that the level of French debt is unacceptable and that the alert threshold has been reached, sparking favorable reactions from several parliamentarians.

Around 10 billion euros linked to imports of “made in France” products would have been returned to French companies after the decision of the American Supreme Court in February concerning the customs duties imposed by Donald Trump, although these reimbursements often go back to the American importer rather than to the French company.

The parent company of the regional daily Sud Ouest, owned by the family of founder Jacques Lemoîne, has entered into exclusive negotiations for a takeover by the Belgian Rossel, already owner in France of La Voix du Nord. The operation, valued at around a hundred million euros, would create a group with more than 400 million euros in turnover, becoming the third player in the French regional press behind SIPA-Ouest-France and EBRA.