
台南地方法院判決承租仁愛之家土地並轉租給電子遊藝場的黃男,必須拆除占用的112.33平方公尺地上物返還土地,扣除提存金額後賠償8萬7570元,並自今年一月起按月給付1萬5763元至還地為止。
AI-generated summary
台南仁愛之家承接清代義田與日治慈惠院物業,名下土地廣闊,早年出租精華地段供市民建屋,近年常因原承租人過世、繼承換約問題衍生訴訟。
黃男承租仁愛之家土地還轉租給遊藝場,拒換約卻辯稱提存租金可續住,台南地院判決黃男須拆屋還地並賠償損失。(記者王捷攝)
承租土地拒絕換約,還出租給電子遊藝場,但承租台南仁愛之家土地的黃姓男子主張,他有提存租金就能永久居住,台南地方法院審理後,判決黃男拆屋返還土地,並按月賠償租金損失。
黃男父親早年向台南仁愛之家承租北區土地興建4層樓房,租期屆滿後未換約,由仁愛之家持續寄單收租。黃父過世後由黃男繼承房產,仁愛之家通知辦理承租權移轉,黃男卻在前年底寄發存證信函表明拒絕換約。仁愛之家自去年起拒收租金,認定租約終止,提告要求拆屋還地並追討不當得利。
黃男答辯聲稱,仁愛之家受政府法規監督,依規定只能租給建屋者,自己向來按時繳租,遭拒收後也辦理提存,有權繼續居住。然而法院調查發現,該房屋一、二樓出租經營電子遊戲場,外牆更懸掛廣告。法官函詢衛福部確認,財團法人出租土地屬私法自治行為,主管機關無權干預續租;黃男既然拒絕換約,事後提存租金自難認雙方仍有租約合意,構成無權占有。
南院審酌該處鄰近火車站,商業機能繁榮,依申報地價年息8%計算租金效益,判決黃男必須拆除占用的112.33平方公尺地上物返還土地;扣除提存金額後,須給付仁愛之家8萬7570元,並自今年一月起按月給付1萬5763元至還地為止,全案仍可上訴。
台南仁愛之家承接清代義田與日治慈惠院物業,名下土地廣闊,早年出租精華地段供市民建屋,近年常因原承租人過世、繼承換約問題衍生訴訟。

A man surnamed Xu discovered that his wife was having an extramarital affair with a male colleague surnamed Li in the same company and sent explicit messages. At the first trial, Li Nan was compensated 200,000 yuan. Xu Nan appealed, claiming that the two base stations repeatedly showed private meetings to rent rooms, and requested an additional compensation of 600,000 yuan. The second-instance judge believed that the base station signal had a wide range and could not prove a meeting or intimate interaction, so he rejected the appeal and ruled.

The Pingtung District Court ruled that a man surnamed Li inherited four leases of nearly 50% of farmland from his father. The land was overgrown with weeds for more than a year because it had not been tidied up for a long time. He violated the 375 Rent Reduction Ordinance and prohibited farming except due to force majeure. The lease was terminated and the farmland was to be taken back.

A Kaohsiung man surnamed Huang collided with a woman while riding a motorcycle with an alcohol level of 0.22 milligrams. The police imposed a fine of NT$15,000 and suspended his driver's license for 24 months in accordance with the Road Traffic Management Punishment Regulations. After hearing the case, the Kaohsiung High Administrative Court held that the main cause of the accident was that the woman suddenly drove sideways, and there was no considerable causal relationship between drunk driving and the injuries sustained in the accident. The original punishment was revoked, and both the ticket and license suspension were annulled.

Relying on the MIP one-stop intellectual property protection platform, the Minhang District Procuratorate successfully cracked down on counterfeit "Bee Flower" shampoo cases and brokered settlements. At the same time, it launched aviation economic prosecutorial services in the "Rocket Star City" commercial aerospace industry cluster to provide full-chain intellectual property legal protection for regional science and technology innovation enterprises.

A man surnamed Su in Tainan was reported by the police for failing to stop for pedestrians while riding a motorcycle at an intersection. He was fined 1,200 yuan and deducted 3 points. Su Nan insisted that being more than 4 meters away from pedestrians met the exemption criteria, but the police said the simulated distance was only 3 meters. The Kaohsiung High Administrative Court believed that the key "3-meter law enforcement red line" had not been clarified and was still controversial, and revoked the original judgment and sent it back for a new trial.

A Croatian court approved the extradition of a Ukrainian man wanted in Germany for the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline explosions. The suspect's lawyer plans to appeal.