Breaking
BackBakırköy Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, Süper Lig maç yayınlarıyla ilgili iddiaları yanıtladı
Bakırköy Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, Süper Lig maç yayınlarıyla ilgili iddiaları yanıtladı
Developing
Hürriyet Gündem3 hours agoHukuk1 min readTürkiyeView translation

Bakırköy Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, Süper Lig maç yayınlarıyla ilgili iddiaları yanıtladı

Quick Look

  • Bakırköy Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, Süper Lig maçlarını izlemeyi engellenen tutuklularla ilgili iddiaların gerçeği yansıtmadığını açıkladı.
  • Ceza infaz kurumlarında 50 ücretsiz televizyon kanalı mevcuttur ve maç yayınları, hükümlü ve tutukluların emanet para hesaplarındaki temettü gelirleriyle karşılanmıştır.
  • Yayıncının aboneliği ticari statüye dönüştüğünden 2026-2027 sezonu için bu kaynak yetersiz hale gelmiş ve yeni abonelik talebi de alınmamıştır.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

Bakırköy Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, İmamoğlu çıkar amaçlı suç örgütü yargılaması kapsamında tutuklu kişilerin Süper Lig maçlarını izlemelerinin engellendiği iddialarıyla ilgili açıklama yaptı.

Font size

Bakırköy Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, Marmara Ceza İnfaz Kurumu’ndaki Süper Lig maç yayınlarına ilişkin iddialar hakkında açıklama yaptı.

Başsavcılıktan yapılan açıklamada, “İmamoğlu çıkar amaçlı suç örgütü” yargılaması kapsamında tutuklu bulunan kişilerin Süper Lig maçlarını izlemelerinin engellendiği yönündeki iddiaların gerçeği yansıtmadığı belirtildi.

50 TELEVİZYON KANALI ÜCRETSİZ İZLENEBİLİYOR

Açıklamada, ceza infaz kurumlarında hâlihazırda 50 televizyon kanalının ücretsiz olarak izlenebildiği ifade edildi.

Süper Lig maç yayınlarına ilişkin abonelik bedelinin bugüne kadar hükümlü ve tutukluların emanet para hesaplarından elde edilen temettü gelirleriyle karşılandığı kaydedildi.

ABONELİK TİCARİ STATÜYE DÖNÜŞTÜ

Yayıncı kuruluşun ceza infaz kurumlarına yönelik aboneliği ticari statüye dönüştürmesi nedeniyle 2026-2027 sezonu abonelik bedelinin söz konusu kaynaktan karşılanmasının mümkün olmadığı belirtildi.

Ayrıca hükümlü ve tutukluların çoğunluğundan yeni abonelik yönünde talep gelmediği bildirildi.

Başsavcılık, yaşanan durumun herhangi bir kişi veya gruba yönelik özel bir uygulamadan kaynaklanmadığını belirterek, durumun abonelik statüsündeki değişiklik ve çoğunluk talebinin bulunmamasından kaynaklandığını açıkladı.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • 2026-2027 Süper Lig sezonu için ceza infaz kurumlarında maç yayınları için yeni bir finansman modeli geliştirilecek

    Possible · Within months

Open Questions

  • Ticari statüye dönüşen aboneliğin yeni maliyeti nedir?
  • Hükümlü ve tutuklular için alternatif finansman kaynakları planlanıyor mu?
  • Bu durum diğer ceza infaz kurumlarında da uygulanacak mı?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by Hürriyet Gündem.

Related Stories

Demirkol stated that his statement dated August 26, 2026 lasted 3-4 hours and that he may not remember it correctly due to stress.
Developing·

Demirkol stated that his statement dated August 26, 2026 lasted 3-4 hours and that he may not remember it correctly due to stress.

In his statement taken within the scope of the investigation regarding Denizolgun's incident on September 7, 2016, Demirkol stated that his statement dated August 26, 2026 lasted 3-4 hours, that he was hungry and thirsty, that he was sweating from stress, and that his hands were shaking. 'It is not possible for me to reach enough truth in this stressful environment. He said, "It is difficult for me to clearly remember the events of 10 years ago" and did not accept the charge of false statement.

Milliyet Son Dakika
1 min read
22 years and 6 months imprisonment requested for Abdullah Aybaba in the Sami Bey Apartment case
Developing·

22 years and 6 months imprisonment requested for Abdullah Aybaba in the Sami Bey Apartment case

40 people lost their lives and 2 people were injured in the February 6 earthquakes in Sami Bey Apartment in Güzelyalı District of Adana's Çukurova district. Adana Chief Public Prosecutor's Office filed a lawsuit against the building's contractors Abdullah Aybaba and Eda Aybaba Çelik, as well as Seyhan Municipality's former Zoning Director Alim Erdoğan and former Survey and Survey Technician Sunay Meydan, demanding imprisonment of up to 22 years and 6 months each for the crime of 'causing the death and injury of more than one person through conscious negligence'. The files were combined and the detained Abdullah Aybaba was connected to the hearing via SEGBİS from prison. Defendant Aybaba stated that no cement or material was stolen in the building, and that during the earthquake, the upper floors first shook and broke away, and then the building collapsed. Mehmet Üsgüloğlu, the victim's lawyer, demanded a separate life sentence for each death, saying that the defendant should have fled abroad and reported the situation if he had good intentions. Abdullah Aybaba stated that he wanted to come to Adana after the first earthquake, but went abroad due to threatening posts, and then returned to the country with his own consent when he learned that a red notice had been issued. Victim lawyer Dudu Büşra Maksutoğlu Karadeniz stated that the defendant fled the country one day after the earthquake and requested life imprisonment for each deceased separately. Defendant Aybaba's lawyer stated that his client was 78 years old, prison conditions were harsh, and requested that he be released under house arrest. Eda Aybaba Çelik's lawyer, on the other hand, said that his client only became a partner of the company in 1994 in accordance with the legal procedure, did not make any profit and had no construction-related activities, and asked for an arrest warrant not for arrest, but for testifying. The court decided to continue Abdullah Aybaba's detention, to wait for the execution of the arrest warrant issued with a red notice about Eda Aybaba Çelik, and to reject at this stage his requests for a new expert report to be prepared by taking a core from Ece Apartment. The next hearing will be held on November 26. During the trial process, it was determined that Abdullah Aybaba went abroad from Istanbul Airport one day after the earthquake, that he did not return to the country later, and that he was detained by the Thai police on April 24, brought to Türkiye on May 15, and his arrest was ordered by the Adana 4th High Criminal Court.

Cumhuriyet
3 min read
The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office Launched an Investigation into the Sharing of Court Hearing Footage on Social Media
Developing·

The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office Launched an Investigation into the Sharing of Court Hearing Footage on Social Media

It was determined that images taken during the hearing of a file that was still being tried at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court were shared on social media. The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office launched an ex officio investigation against those who recorded and shared images without authorization within the scope of Article 286 of the Turkish Penal Code.

Sabah Gündem
1 min read
Arrested defendants in the Izmir heavy rain disaster case were released
Developing·

Arrested defendants in the Izmir heavy rain disaster case were released

As a result of the investigation launched into the incident in which two young people lost their lives due to the downpour in Izmir on July 12, 2024, a lawsuit was filed against 42 defendants for "negligent homicide". Izmir 10th High Criminal Court gave prison sentences in its first decision, but Izmir Regional Administrative Court 14th Criminal Chamber annulled its decision and released the detained defendants. A third expert report was added to the case, emphasizing the incident's relationship with long-term infrastructure design defects and a decision was made to appoint a new expert panel.

Milliyet Son Dakika
2 min read
Deniz Göktaş Arrested Again for Social Media Content
Developing·

Deniz Göktaş Arrested Again for Social Media Content

Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office launched an investigation because there was a criminal element in the videos published by Deniz Göktaş on virtual media platforms. Göktaş was arrested on July 3 on charges of 'insulting the President' and 'inciting the public to hatred and hostility', but was released upon the objection of his lawyers. He was released on August 28, but was immediately arrested again on the charge of 'praising the crime and the criminal'. On August 31, his previous release decision was withdrawn upon the objection of the prosecutor's office, and it was decided to re-arrest him on the same charges.

Hürriyet Gündem
1 min read