
Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon referred to the housing policy white paper published by the Seoul Metropolitan Government and criticized that the opportunity to supply 430,000 housing units was lost due to the removal of maintenance zones under former Mayor Park Won-soon, and urged the government and ruling party to change the policy direction.
AI-generated summary
The Seoul Metropolitan Government published a white paper evaluating and reflecting on 20 years of housing supply policy, and Mayor Oh Se-hoon used this to criticize the policy of releasing maintenance zones under former Mayor Park Won-soon.
Introducing the 20-year white paper on Seoul’s housing policy… “The opportunity to supply 430,000 units disappeared during the Park Won-soon era.”
“The wrong decision from 15 years ago is back with numerous ‘housing removals’... the people will pay the price.”
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Kim Dong-gyu = Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon mentioned the Seoul Metropolitan Government's recently published housing policy white paper on the 18th and urged, "The government and the ruling party must now admit their failure and correct the direction of their policies."
On this day, Mayor Oh posted a post on Facebook titled 'Seoul City's Reflection Statement, I recommend reading it' and said, "It has been exactly one year since the Lee Jae-myung administration announced the October 15 Real Estate Measures, and the report card is so miserable that it is painful to open."
He criticized, “The government seems to have neither the courage to reflect on the past nor the will to face reality,” and “Rather, the President and the Democratic Party are busy evading responsibility by blaming the incumbent mayor for the current housing supply cliff.”
He then introduced the white paper 'Evaluation and Reflection on 20 Years of Seoul's Housing Supply Policy' released by the Seoul Metropolitan Government on the 16th and evaluated it as "a reflective confession in which Seoul City officials themselves looked back on the past and exposed the scars left by wrong policies."
Based on the contents of the white paper, Mayor Oh intensively criticized the maintenance project policy during the tenure of former Mayor Park Won-soon.
He claimed, "During the time of Mayor Park Won-soon, 389 maintenance zones were lifted, and the opportunity to supply 430,000 housing units disappeared. At that time, the construction industry was recovering from the aftermath of the financial crisis, and the golden age of supply was just around the corner."
In particular, he pointed out, “Not only the places where a promotion committee has already been formed and approval for establishment of a union has been obtained, but also the places where project implementation approval has been completed have all been canceled. Even though the project has made considerable progress, the number of areas where the cancellation has been canceled is as many as 159, or 41% of the total.”
He also criticized the lifting process, saying, "There were cases of hastily promoting it by using the names of the dead in the name of surveying residents' opinions, cases of lifting by arbitrarily interpreting ordinances, and even cases of lifting ex officio despite opposition from residents and autonomous districts."
At the same time, he claimed, “At the basis of this, there was a hostile view that ‘redevelopment and reconstruction is speculation,’” and that “the wrong decision from 15 years ago has returned with the ‘elimination of numerous houses’ that should have been supplied by now.”
Mayor Oh introduced that the white paper was distributed to the offices of lawmakers belonging to the Land, Infrastructure and Transport Committee of the National Assembly last week and encouraged lawmakers from the ruling and opposition parties to read it.
In particular, he emphasized to the Democratic Party members, "Just as the city of Seoul confesses and reflects on its past mistakes, the government and the ruling party must now admit their failures and correct the direction of their policies."
He went on to say, “Policies without reflection repeat failure, and the cost always falls on the people.”
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
There is a possibility that the government and ruling party will change the direction of real estate policy.
Possible · Within months

Samsung C&T announced on the 19th that it was finally selected as the construction company for the pilot apartment reconstruction project in Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul. This project, with a construction cost of 2.2685 trillion won, is a project to create 2,480 apartment houses from 6 underground floors to 59 floors above ground. A new complex name, Raemian Sonelli, was proposed, and OMA will participate in the design.

Next month, the number of apartments available nationwide is expected to drop to 11,559 households, down 30% from the previous month and 49% from the same month last year. In particular, the metropolitan area is expected to have 4,031 households, a 49% decrease from this month, and Seoul is expected to have only 488 households in three complexes. In rural areas, 7,523 households are scheduled to move in.

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport is optimistic about the possibility of stabilizing the housing market in the mid- to long-term based on improvements in housing supply leading indicators and declines in sales prices in some regions, and announced that supply and demand conditions will significantly improve with the full-scale occupancy of the 3rd new city in 2028.
![[1 year of Toheo District expansion] Increased increase in housing prices in 11 out of 12 Gyeonggi regions before and after designation](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.yna.co.kr%2Fphoto%2Fyna%2FYH%2F2026%2F07%2F10%2FPYH2026071006800001300_P2.jpg&w=320&q=72&f=webp)
It was found that in 11 of the 12 land transaction permit zones in Gyeonggi Province designated as part of the October 15 real estate measures last year, the rate of increase in apartment prices in the year after designation of regulations increased compared to before. In particular, Gwangmyeong City showed the largest increase in the growth rate, increasing by 19.0 percentage points from 1.8% to 20.8%, and Gwacheon City was the only city where the growth rate slowed. Experts called for checking effectiveness and considering side effects.
![[1 year of Tohe district expansion] Gangnam is captured, but ‘decoupling’ is increasing in other regions](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.yna.co.kr%2Fphoto%2Fyna%2FYH%2F2026%2F07%2F05%2FPYH2026070504740006100_P2.jpg&w=320&q=72&f=webp)
Despite the decline in house prices in Gangnam, Seoul, apartment prices are continuing to rise mainly in non-regulated areas such as Gunpo-si, Gyeonggi-do, Byeongjeom-gu, Hwaseong-si, and Wonmi-gu, Bucheon-si, and prices have also risen significantly in regulated areas such as Maegyo-dong, Paldal-gu, Suwon-si. Uiwang-si and low-cost areas outside Seoul also recorded double-digit growth rates, and 8 of the top 10 areas with the highest growth rates this year were Gyeonggi-do. It is analyzed that the decrease in jeonse and monthly rent listings and Samsung Electronics' in-house housing loan were influential.

The average monthly interest cost for jeonse households in the second quarter of this year was 211,965 won, an increase of 144.2% from the second quarter of 2019, and significantly exceeded the 66.1% increase in interest costs for owner-occupied households during the same period. The ratio of interest costs to income for jeonse households has risen to 3.7%, and the rising jeonse price is also acting as a factor in increasing the burden on tenants.