
The election has already started, causing confusion... Ban on ordering use of constituency maps in 2025, citing โPurcell Principlesโ
AI-generated summary
In Missouri, when the Republican Party attempted to reorganize the federal House of Representatives districts to their advantage, civic groups protested and a court case broke out.
โChanging constituencies since the election has already started will cause confusion.โ
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Kang Hoon-sang = CNN reported on the 25th (local time) that the U.S. Supreme Court put a stop to an attempt to reorganize Missouri's U.S. House of Representatives districts to favor the Republican Party. This is the third similar decision by the Federal Supreme Court this month.
The Supreme Court said in its decision that day, "Ballots according to the 2022 electoral districts have been printed and sent, and absentee voting and voting for military personnel and overseas nationals have already begun. If the election is ordered to be returned to the 2025 electoral districts while the election is in progress, the election will be confused."
He then referred to the 'Purcell Principle', which states that courts at all levels must be very careful in changing voting rules and districts when an election is imminent or has already begun, and emphasized, "Federal district courts and appellate courts should not order or require Missouri to use the 2025 district map in this federal House election."
Accordingly, the Republican Party's attempt to change the structure of Missouri's Federal House of Representatives, which currently has 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats, to 7 to 1, was virtually defeated.
The issue of Missouri's electoral district realignment arose last year when U.S. President Donald Trump called for the district to be redrawn in favor of the Republican Party.
The Republican-dominated Missouri Legislature drew new congressional districts at President Trump's order. Kansas City's 5th Congressional District, which is dominated by the Democratic Party, was divided and mixed with the Republican-dominated district.
Civic groups argued for a referendum, raising concerns about gerrymandering (drawing electoral districts in favor of a specific political party), but the state government immediately applied new electoral districts to the primary election, which led to a complicated legal battle.
The Missouri court's first trial ruled in favor of the state government, but the state Supreme Court ruled on the 3rd that the demarcation of new electoral districts (2025 map) must be submitted to a referendum. The Federal Supreme Court ruled in favor of the civic group on the 8th, rejecting the application to suspend the Missouri Supreme Court's ruling.
Separately, Federal District Court Judge Stephen Clark issued a temporary restraining order on the use of 2022 electoral districts and supported the 2025 electoral district map, but the Federal Supreme Court on the 10th accepted the application for a stay of execution in this regard.
Although the Federal Supreme Court blocked the reorganization of electoral districts twice, the Federal Appeals Court accepted the Republican candidate's argument that the same standard should be applied to the main election because the primary election was held using the 2025 district map. Accordingly, a civic group filed an emergency application to the Federal Supreme Court on the 22nd to block this, and the decision was made that day.
Regarding the Supreme Court's third decision that day, Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe said he was disappointed but would follow the Supreme Court's decision that day.
The civic group 'Non-Politicians', which filed an emergency appeal to the Federal Supreme Court, welcomed the decision, saying, "The attempts by corrupt politicians to force their own district maps outside the procedures stipulated in the Missouri Constitution are over."

The White House released the U.S.-China summit fact sheet on the 25th (local time) and announced that President Trump and President Xi Jinping discussed the risks and benefits of AI and agreed to use the term superintelligence. The two leaders also agreed that Iran should not possess nuclear weapons and that no country or agency should impose tolls on international waterways, which was interpreted as an attack on Iran's plan to impose de facto tolls on ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

The Blue House reaffirmed its existing position that the principle of non-disclosure of the Ukrainian president's public remarks on the repatriation of North Korean prisoners of war to South Korea should be maintained, and announced that it would not provide a specific response to the Ukrainian source's rebuttal.

Danyang-gun is pursuing the enactment of the 'Danyang-gun Basic Income Support Ordinance', which will provide local currency worth 150,000 won per month to all residents in accordance with the government's policy of expanding basic income pilot projects for rural and fishing communities. The county took preemptive action to be designated as a pilot project area through the enactment of ordinances and resident resolution meetings.

The Democratic Party of Korea criticized the People's Power Party's offensive regarding the suspected DMZ landmine explosion as a conspiracy theory that instigates security anxiety, and Rep. Park Jie-won urged the government to reveal the truth about the landmine accident and the repatriation of North Korean prisoners of war.

The People Power Party criticized the Lee Jae-myung administration, saying that even five days after the suspected landmine explosion in the DMZ, no on-site investigation has been carried out, and that the Lee Jae-myung government is deliberately delaying the investigation to keep North Korea in check and is carrying out an operation to conceal North Korea's actions. Floor leader Jeong Jeong-sik and chief spokesperson Park Seong-hoon called for a quick investigation and announcement of the culprit, while lawmakers Yoon Sang-hyun, Bae Jun-young, and Han Dong-hoon questioned the government's complacent response and its connection to the UN speech.

Korea will contest the International Court of Justice (ICJ) judgeship election in November with Baek Jin-hyeon, former president of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, as its first ever Korean candidate. Competing with Singapore and Jordan for one seat in Asia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs acknowledged the lack of a regional base as a weakness, but touted the candidate's international experience and reputation as a strength.