
The Blue House reaffirmed its existing position that the principle of non-disclosure of the Ukrainian president's public remarks on the repatriation of North Korean prisoners of war to South Korea should be maintained, and announced that it would not provide a specific response to the Ukrainian source's rebuttal.
AI-generated summary
When Ukrainian President Zelenskyy disclosed the repatriation of two North Korean prisoners of war to South Korea, the South Korean government raised criticism, claiming that there was a non-disclosure agreement.
‘Private disclosure was appropriate’, once again emphasizing the Korean government’s position
A Ukrainian source said, “I wasn’t promised secrecy”…靑 “I will not answer”
(Mexico City = Yonhap News) Reporter Lim Hyeong-seop and Seol Seung-eun = As controversy continues as the South Korean government criticizes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for disclosing the repatriation of two North Korean prisoners of war to South Korea, the Blue House stated on the 26th that "our government's position is to respond according to consistent principles."
This can be interpreted as re-emphasizing the Korean government's existing position that non-disclosure was appropriate as being 'based on consistent principles.'
Previously, President Lee said of President Zelenskyy's remarks, "They broke the non-disclosure agreement and made it public. It is very disappointing," and a senior Blue House official also pointed out to reporters, "During the consultation with Ukraine, there was an understanding that the process would be handled quietly without disclosing it, but it is true that President Zelenskyy mentioned it in his speech contrary to the existing understanding."
However, on this day, some media outlets, citing local Ukrainian media, reported that a source in the Ukrainian President's Office refuted, saying, "Ukraine did not promise to keep (the repatriation of prisoners) secret."
In relation to this, a Blue House official met with reporters at the press center set up in Mexico City on the occasion of President Lee Jae-myung's state visit to Mexico and asked about the Blue House's position on the Ukrainian source's remarks, saying, "I don't think it is appropriate to respond in detail to the source's remarks. I will not respond to that."
Instead, this official said, "Our government's position is to respond in accordance with consistent principles based on the principles stated by a senior Blue House official yesterday, that is, based on the wishes of the parties involved, domestic law, international legal standards, and humanitarian principles."
Although there was no direct response to the remarks made by the Ukrainian source, it can be seen as a remark indirectly revealing that it is a consistent principle not to disclose the fact of prisoner repatriation.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Blue House will refrain from expressing additional public positions and maintain its current position.
Likely · Within weeks

Danyang-gun is pursuing the enactment of the 'Danyang-gun Basic Income Support Ordinance', which will provide local currency worth 150,000 won per month to all residents in accordance with the government's policy of expanding basic income pilot projects for rural and fishing communities. The county took preemptive action to be designated as a pilot project area through the enactment of ordinances and resident resolution meetings.

The Democratic Party of Korea criticized the People's Power Party's offensive regarding the suspected DMZ landmine explosion as a conspiracy theory that instigates security anxiety, and Rep. Park Jie-won urged the government to reveal the truth about the landmine accident and the repatriation of North Korean prisoners of war.

The People Power Party criticized the Lee Jae-myung administration, saying that even five days after the suspected landmine explosion in the DMZ, no on-site investigation has been carried out, and that the Lee Jae-myung government is deliberately delaying the investigation to keep North Korea in check and is carrying out an operation to conceal North Korea's actions. Floor leader Jeong Jeong-sik and chief spokesperson Park Seong-hoon called for a quick investigation and announcement of the culprit, while lawmakers Yoon Sang-hyun, Bae Jun-young, and Han Dong-hoon questioned the government's complacent response and its connection to the UN speech.

Korea will contest the International Court of Justice (ICJ) judgeship election in November with Baek Jin-hyeon, former president of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, as its first ever Korean candidate. Competing with Singapore and Jordan for one seat in Asia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs acknowledged the lack of a regional base as a weakness, but touted the candidate's international experience and reputation as a strength.

Gimhae City, Gyeongsangnam-do, will introduce a citizen jury system next month to check and verify the implementation of pledges for the 9th popular election. Approximately 30 Gimhae citizens aged 19 or older will be randomly selected considering gender, age, and region, and the Korea Manifesto Implementation Headquarters will take charge of the operation service and conduct the education program and selection process. The selected citizen jury plans to hold three meetings in November to discuss and deliberate on ways to improve pledges, and then disclose the results on the city website in December to increase policy transparency.

In the country of origin labeling crackdown conducted ahead of holidays such as Chuseok, kimchi and pork had the most violations, and the rate of false labeling was especially high. Rep. Lee Yang-soo emphasized the need for close crackdowns focusing on major items with repeated violations.