
The political advantage the Kuomintang has accumulated in Taipei City in the past is considered difficult to shake. However, when new citizen forces begin to gather together, the election results that seemed certain in the past may also become uncertain.
AI-generated summary
Taipei City has long been regarded as a constituency where the KMT has an advantage, but recent polls show that the gap between blue and green is narrowing.
Is Taipei’s political fundamentals really that unbreakable? For a long time, the political advantage accumulated by the Kuomintang in the capital has been regarded as difficult to shake. However, the political landscape is not monolithic. When new citizen forces begin to gather together, the election results that seemed certain in the past may also become uncertain.
Japanese scholar Ogasawara Yoshiyuki wrote an article on October 22, revising the previous judgment that Jiang Wanan's re-election was almost a foregone conclusion, pointing out that Shen Boyang is catching up quickly. According to a TVBS poll released on October 8, the gap between the two has narrowed to 8 percentage points from 28 percentage points in May. This does not mean a reversal of victory, but it shows that the political fundamentals are not unchallengeable.
"Ocean current streamers" are a phenomenon worth observing. On October 18, Taichung City Councilor Lin Qifeng prepared 3,000 streamers, and people arrived at the scene at 6 a.m. to wait. According to reports, 300 streamers in Pingtung were collected within 15 minutes. The community even has the interesting nickname of "streamer millionaire", which adds joy and recognition to political participation.
However, what really matters is not how many streamers are distributed, but whether this enthusiasm can transcend the stratosphere and attract young people, middle voters and politically apathetic people. Community voice does not equal votes, and the upsurge in participation does not mean that the political structure has changed.
Taipei’s political base has a profound historical background. After 1949, Taipei, as a political and administrative center, gradually formed a specific population structure, resource distribution and social network. The long-term accumulated institutional advantages, interest relationships and political identity cannot be changed by a campaign.
But all KMT supporters cannot be regarded as vested interests. Political choices also come from family, generations and life experience. To break through the existing structure, we cannot just rely on passion, but also need to propose specific policies for fair distribution, improvement of transportation, housing and living environment, so that voters can believe that change can bring a better life.
From the general recall in 2025 to this year’s ocean currents, citizen participation is accumulating new political experiences. Winning or losing an election is important, but organizational capabilities, social connections, and dialogue across positions are what sustain change.
Change does not happen in a day, and the political base is not a wall that can never be loosened.
Whether the ocean current can turn around or not remains to be answered by votes. But as long as every participation can leave trust, organization and public discussion, so that more silent citizens are willing to invest, the ocean current will not only be an election craze, but also the starting point for changing Taipei's political culture.

The Blue and White camp of the Legislative Yuan passed the amendment to the "Elderly Welfare Law" on the third reading to require the central government to subsidize the elderly's health care premiums. People's Party Chairman Huang Guochang criticized the DPP's opposition to the central government's law amendment as a double standard. The author believes that this move confuses local autonomy and central government statutory expenditure, and ignores the distinction between fiscal sustainability and constitutional government.

The Legislative Yuan rejected all 27 Supervisory Yuan nominees on September 29, resulting in a long-term vacancy among the Supervisory Yuan. This article explores the constitutional crisis behind this incident, analyzes the problem of vacancies in supervisory functions, and proposes the necessity of establishing a short-term transition mechanism and long-term constitutional revision to reorganize supervisory powers.

French football star Kylian Mbappe was accused of hurting the feelings of the Chinese people when he mentioned an emoticon that spoofed him as Mao Zedong in an interview. Many Chinese sponsors announced the termination of their contracts, and the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned this. The incident sparked discussions about ideological control and historical evaluation in China.
French player Kylian Mbappe's inappropriate remarks related to China triggered a boycott by domestic netizens and the termination of business cooperation. La Liga and Real Madrid have apologized successively, but Real Madrid's past handling of such incidents has aroused public doubts, and its business layout in China is facing a severe test.

Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim, hosts of the Yale Forum on Religion and Ecology, were accused in the Strategy Risks report of unknowingly becoming academic endorsements of the CCP's Xinjiang policy and becoming tools of the united front because they participated in the Xinjiang forum hosted by the CCP and made positive comments.

As the summit of the Organization of Turkic Countries was held in Ankara, author Mei Xinyu analyzed that China, not Türkiye, is the economic growth engine of the Central Asian-Caucasus countries. Data show that the trade volume between China and the region far exceeds intra-organizational trade, and Türkiye has limitations in investment capabilities and logistics stability.