
哈佛大學以台灣成功案例為教學方案,然而國稅局高階官員涉貪與過往稅務爭議,凸顯了潛在的制度危機與租稅正義問題。
哈佛大學以台灣成功案例為教學方案引發自豪,但作者指出輝達執行長黃仁勳讚賞台灣為AI核心震央的同時,也應警惕地緣政治、關稅危機以及中區國稅局高階官員涉貪等潛在制度與租稅正義問題。
AI-generated summary
哈佛大學教授以台灣成功案例作為教學方案。中區國稅局曾爆發高階官員涉嫌勾結會計師收賄助富商逃漏稅案。
◎ 李克
哈佛大學教授最近以台灣兩大成功案例作為教學方案,這兩大領域之所以被稱為「別國學不來」的奇蹟,生為台灣人與有榮焉,我們希望能繼續保持好的成績。看完媒體報導一則以喜一則以憂,喜的是輝達(NVIDIA)執行長黃仁勳多次公開表示,台灣是全球人工智慧(AI)革命的核心震央;憂的是國人沾沾自喜,忘了潛在的危機,還有別國也都急起直追,何況地緣與川普的關稅危機。
談到關稅危機,不得不讓人想起日前一則駭人的新聞,報導說:「財政部中區國稅局驚爆高階官員勾結會計師涉貪重大弊案!在局內位階僅次於正副局長與主任秘書的『第4號人物』王姓簡任稽核,涉嫌利用掌管綜合所得稅等稅務大權,長年與多名會計師暗中勾結收賄、協助富商與民眾逃漏巨額稅捐。」據聞,台中市長盧秀燕時任立法院財政委員會委員時,中區民眾稅務陳情案件特別多是稅災重災區,她多次在立院提出修法與質詢,強調租稅公平與租稅正義。
台中地檢署偵辦中區國稅局簡任稽核王志益,涉嫌勾結會計師助逃漏稅,檢警查扣大批現金。(資料照,記者陳建志翻攝)
「史上最倒楣公益律師黃文皇:背了一億一千兩百萬元稅單」,這個案件就發生在中區,國稅局為達到課稅目的,不惜硬坳、扭曲事實。黃文皇律師被台中地院指定擔任遺產管理人,不但義務擔任公益律師,自己還多墊了三千多元處理該案,沒想到國稅局卻突然對黃文皇開單重罰,一張上億稅單、一場惡夢就此開始,至今仍未結束。台中律師公會理事長並請商立法院財政委員會盧秀燕委員協助。律師黃文皇向時任財政部次長張盛和報告,馬上被張盛和打斷:你不用跟我講,我都知道了!並隨即轉過頭狠狠的對他說:如果不罰你們,你們就會和繼承人勾串!原來我們的官員認為人民都是賊,認知偏差,這個案子繼承人已經拋棄繼承跑掉了,要如何勾串?
正義的對立面是邪惡。那麼,什麼是「邪惡」?它可能就藏在日常的制度與程序裡,藏在一句看似合理卻似是而非的「依法行政」之中。我們談「邪惡的平庸」,不是要把所有執法人員都貼上「邪惡」的標籤,而是想問一個更重要的問題:當一項行政決定可能造成錯誤或不公平時,只要一句「我只是照規定做」,就足以成為不再思考、不再檢視,也不再修正的理由嗎?如果連財政部次長都用這種思考邏輯,人民的租稅正義誰來保護?所以中區國稅局驚爆高階官員勾結會計師涉貪重大弊案,也是時間早晚會爆發的可能!
前財政部次長張盛和。(資料照)
中區國稅局過去有十大追稅女悍將,加上台中高等行政法院稅務訴訟有判人民100%敗訴的法官,人民只要卡上稅務案件穩死沒命,只要牽涉到有利益關係,就會有人作奸犯科,因為人性無法克制貪婪,史記司馬遷早就說過:「天下熙熙,皆為利來;天下攘攘,皆為利往」。哈佛大學教授對台灣的評價那麼高,我們不要妄自菲薄,把台灣鄉親骨子裡的四個字「感恩與惜福」發揮出來,那才是社會韌性、台灣的底氣。

Germany and France proposed that the EU establish powerful trade countermeasures tools to deal with economic coercion from China and other countries. The plan is intended to serve as a "second strike" by restricting market access, but experts question the tool's actual deterrent effect against a backdrop of high reliance on China for key raw materials.

The U.S. FBI arrested California real estate agent Zhang Wanying on October 4, accusing her of being instructed by Chinese officials to follow and collect information on Lai Ting, the eldest son of Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, and his residence and vehicles in the United States. The case highlights China's pattern of cross-border repression using overseas civilians to outsource intelligence, and has triggered discussions about loopholes in Taiwan's national security laws.

The author explores the complexities of China's stance on AI safety, noting that the country's AI safety community is actively engaging with frontier risks, as evidenced by the recent AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0.

Zhang Houguang pointed out that Taiwan should respond to China's Taiwan-related system's strategy of using market resources to gain political expression from artists. It should not simply oppose or rely on subsidies, but build a sound cultural industry chain so that creators can have free creation and an international stage in Taiwan. This will fundamentally enhance the attractiveness of staying in Taiwan and prevent talents from being forced to exchange value due to lack of opportunities.

The G216 line of Tibet's Jilong Port was damaged by the disaster, and China Aneng deployed militarized engineering troops to repair it. The author believes that Taiwan should learn from its "National Engineering Resilience" and establish a professional disaster relief mechanism. At the same time, it should be wary of the opacity and excessive publicity of disaster relief information under the authoritarian system, and use a pragmatic attitude to improve the defense resilience of the whole society.

The Russia-Ukraine war has entered its fourth year. The author Lu Zhi pointed out that the war originated from Putin's misjudgment of Ukraine's will to resist. The article uses this to reflect on Taiwan, explore cross-strait exchanges, the stance of the Golden Horse, national defense arms purchases and asymmetric combat power, emphasizing that the key to avoiding war is to prevent Beijing from mistakenly thinking that Taiwan is weak and can be bullied.