AI-generated summary
The initiative was launched amid growing competition between the US and China to shape global AI governance, with both powers advancing competing frameworks. The declaration emphasizes human oversight and control of advanced AI systems, calling for mandatory testing and international standards without demanding a development pause.
A group of mostly European states and middle powers is seeking to build a new global coalition on artificial intelligence, as countries outside the US-China technology race scramble to retain influence over how increasingly powerful systems are governed.
Leaders representing 20 countries, alongside European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, signed the declaration on Monday on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly High-level Week in New York, calling for frontier AI to remain “under human direction, oversight and control.” The initiative was spearheaded by Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store.
The world’s two leading AI powers – the US and China – did not sign. Neither did several major European players, including the UK, France and Italy, although Germany, Spain and a number of smaller EU states joined the initiative. The statement remains open for additional endorsements.
The declaration warns that advanced AI systems have already circumvented testing safeguards, exploited vulnerabilities and gained unauthorized access to real-world systems. It calls for mandatory pre-deployment testing, independent evaluations with sufficient access to frontier models, common international standards and shared reporting of serious safety incidents.
It stops short, however, of demanding a pause or slowdown in AI development. Instead, its backers want UN members to explore creating an international institution capable of setting standards, verifying compliance and convening governments when AI systems cross certain capability thresholds.
Stubb acknowledged that bringing the dominant AI powers on board will be crucial, telling Politico that the goal was to create “momentum” and eventually attract both Washington and Beijing.
“I think it will be in the interest of both China and the United States to have some kind of guardrails,” he said, arguing that “humans need to be in charge.” Stubb said his preferred model would resemble the International Atomic Energy Agency, although organizers deliberately left the institutional format open to avoid alienating governments wary of creating another UN body.
The push comes as Washington and Beijing are increasingly setting the terms of the global AI debate themselves and promoting competing international frameworks. AI safety is also expected to feature when President Donald Trump meets Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday.
Washington’s Pax Silica initiative has expanded to 24 partners and centers on securing semiconductor, critical-mineral and AI supply chains among what the US describes as “trusted” partners.
Beijing, meanwhile, established the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July with 29 founding countries, including Russia, many of them from the Global South. China has paired that initiative with open-weight models, training programs and infrastructure projects, presenting itself as an alternative to Western-controlled AI ecosystems.
The UN has also launched its own Global Dialogue on AI Governance, meaning the new European-led initiative enters an increasingly crowded contest over who gets to write global AI rules.
Some countries are keeping a foot in multiple emerging AI governance camps rather than choosing a single bloc. Kazakhstan has gone furthest in hedging its bets, joining China-backed WAICO and the US-led Pax Silica initiative while also signing Monday’s “human control” declaration. Kenya and South Africa, meanwhile, are founding members of WAICO and have now backed the new European-led initiative as well.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The initiative will attract additional endorsements from countries seeking to balance between US and China AI frameworks
Likely · Within months
Discussions will continue on creating an international institution for AI governance modeled after the IAEA
Possible · Within months

Security researcher Abdelhamid Naseri discovered the BigDiskBuster vulnerability in Windows, which allows attackers to disable Windows Defender antivirus database updates, leaving systems vulnerable to new threats. The vulnerability affects all current versions of Microsoft's OS and is reminiscent of the old UnDefend vulnerability from April 2026.
The FAA has deployed the SMART AI system at Reagan National, Dulles, and BWI airports to assist air traffic controllers with congestion and weather management, emphasizing human oversight amid broader debates about AI safety and autonomy in critical operations.

Russian scientists from the Kazan State Agrarian University have trained artificial intelligence to detect various types of milk adulteration, including antibiotics, preservatives, herbal additives and GMO components, offering a multi-level quality control system: rapid screening followed by accurate laboratory verification if suspected.

The hacker group Shiny Hunters claims to have hacked several FBI-related services, including a job site, and gained access to the personal data of approximately five thousand employees and job applicants in the department, providing a sample of the data to the portal 404 Media, which partially confirmed its authenticity.

US President Donald Trump said at the UN General Assembly that the US intends to encourage the development of artificial intelligence, proposing to use the term “superintelligence” instead of “artificial intelligence”, as the latter creates a false impression that the technology is unreal, and stressed that the authorities will closely monitor its development, including through the Department of Justice.

US President Donald Trump said at the UN General Assembly that the US will encourage the development of superintelligence, rather than restrain it. He also announced the appointment of a new AI advisor and the creation of an "AI force", having previously criticized Anthropic's proposal to pause AI progress.