Federal judge blocks Trump administration's election-related conditions on counterterrorism grants
Quick Look
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., blocked the Trump administration's attempt to withhold federal counterterrorism funding from states that do not comply with election administration demands, ruling the conditions lack congressional authority and violate legal thresholds tied to grant purposes.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The Trump administration has sought to tie federal counterterrorism grants to state compliance with election administration demands, including requirements related to voting systems and ballot audits, amid Democratic efforts to gain control of Congress in the November midterm elections.
HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania: A federal judge on Monday blocked the authority of President Donald Trump’s administration to withhold some federal counterterrorism funding from states that don’t meet its election administration demands.
Courts have largely rejected the administration’s previous efforts, which reflect untrue claims about widespread voting fraud and come ahead of November’s midterm elections where Democrats seek to take control of one or both chambers of Congress and check Trump’s power.
US District Judge Amir Ali in Washington, D.C., wrote in a 24-page opinion that federal agencies didn't have the authority from Congress to add such conditions to the grants, and that the conditions didn't meet legal thresholds requiring them to relate to the underlying grant purpose.
Neither the Department of Homeland Security nor its subagency handling the grants, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, immediately responded to a request for comment. The grant conditions were the latest in a line of actions by Trump’s administration to shape how elections are run, a task that has long been the job of states.
Over the summer, a FEMA antiterrorism grant announcement included a list of election-related requirements, saying that 20% of grants for states and urban areas would be withheld until they comply.
The program includes more than $1 billion for states and local and tribal governments for a variety of programs aimed at preventing terror at crowded places, online, with border security — and around elections. FEMA expects to award 56 grants.
Places that use electronic voting systems that use barcodes or QR codes to count votes would have to submit plans to switch to hand-marked paper ballots. Every jurisdiction would have to show it audits results.
In the lawsuit, the cities and counties said FEMA had no authority to impose those conditions, “not under its governing statute and not under the Constitution.”
Congress authorized FEMA to help jurisdictions protect critical infrastructure from terrorism and cyberattacks, not to decide who can vote, how ballots must be counted or how states maintain voter rolls, the cities and counties wrote.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Trump administration will appeal the court's decision to block election-related conditions on counterterrorism grants
Likely · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Will the Trump administration appeal the court's decision?
- How will states respond to the ruling regarding their election administration practices?
- What impact will this have on the distribution of FEMA counterterrorism grants?







