
AI-generated summary
Defendant İmamoğlu explained the case process regarding himself at the hearing at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court. He argued that an attempt was made to prevent the objections of the interrogation process and that the report was untrue.
Making his defense at the hearing held by the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court in the hall opposite the Marmara Closed Penal Institution, the defendant İmamoğlu thanked his wife Dilek İmamoğlu and the lawyers and stated that he had a very difficult time in prison.
Defendant İmamoğlu, who said that there was no ordinary interrogation in this room today and that he had been waiting for this interrogation for months, made the following statement: "I waited the most. I wanted it to be the first. Then, if it was to be the last, I wanted it to be the last. Then, of course, the process did not progress as we wanted. I would like to explain a little why he waited. This story actually shows what kind of process and environment this case was progressing in. When it was my turn to interrogate on July 7, the interrogations of my friends were cut off before me. The interrogations of the lawyers were cut off. The interrogations of the defense lawyers were cut off. "Their statements were restricted. Then, when it was my turn, I expressed my objections, they were tried to prevent me from being interrogated, and I was not allowed to have an interrogation with false statements. As a matter of fact, when the audio recordings were transcribed, the truth came out."
Defendant İmamoğlu argued that the report stating "I will not defend myself" was completely untrue.
İmamoğlu, who said that he joined politics at the age of 38 and gave his struggle and effort within the political party at the highest level, explained that he attaches the highest value to respecting and contributing to the institutionality of doing politics within the party.
Stating that he spent more time on politics than his business life, İmamoğlu said that he was later elected to public office and became first the Mayor of Beylikdüzü and then the Mayor of Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality.
In his defense, the defendant İmamoğlu also touched upon the cases in which he was tried and argued that he did not show favoritism, did not create opportunities for his wife or friends, and kept the control at the highest level.
The hearing was postponed until tomorrow to continue taking the defense of the defendant İmamoğlu.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The hearing will continue tomorrow and the defendant's defense will be completed.
Very likely · Within days

The first hearing of the Yenidoğan Gang case started with the defense of the detained defendant Fırat Sarı at the Bakırköy 22nd High Criminal Court. Sarı claimed that the baby deaths were not related to SSI fraud, that the evidence was obscured by not performing an autopsy, and requested an autopsy on the babies. The court released the two defendants and postponed the hearing to January 26.

In the case where 62 defendants, who were alleged to have referred baby emergency patients to the neonatal units of private hospitals in Istanbul, caused their deaths and made unfair profits, were tried, Bakırköy 22nd High Criminal Court released the detained doctors Rıza Keykubad and Zeki Ötünç, decided to continue the detention of the other defendants and postponed the hearing to 26 January.

Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office decided to block access to Halk TV's YouTube,

A US court has granted access to interview records of former Apple employees during the OpenAI hiring process. While Apple claimed that confidential technical information was transferred, the court gave OpenAI 5 to 14 days to deliver the documents.

Ankara 11th High Criminal Court heard the case of lawyer Alperen Demirdiş, who rejected the court panel on the grounds that they used religious symbols. The prosecutor demanded that the defendant be punished; The hearing was postponed to 22 October.

The trial of lawyer Alperen Demirdiş, who objected to the court panel's decision to wear a headscarf and requested recusal, was postponed to 22 October, with a time for defense against the opinion on the merits, at the Ankara 11th High Criminal Court.