
AI-generated summary
In its objection against former prosecutors and judges, the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office stated that the transactions were not simple judicial errors and constituted the crimes of "Violation of the Constitution" within the scope of Article 309 of the Turkish Penal Code and "Torture" within the scope of Article 94 of the Turkish Penal Code.
NOT AN ORDINARY MISTAKE, BUT A CRIME OF TORTURE AND VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION
Remarkable details were included in the objection made by the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office to the Supreme Court. It was underlined that the actions of the conspirators cannot be considered as a simple miscarriage of justice or an individual crime. It was emphasized that the illegal actions in question were executive acts of the crime of "Violation of the Constitution" in Article 309 of the Turkish Penal Code, and that these practices against the victims constituted the crime of "Torture" within the scope of TCK 94, which is not subject to statute of limitations.
21 CONSPIRACY NAMES TO BE TRIALD
Dismissed judges and prosecutors whose retrial was opened by the decision of the Bakırköy 11th High Criminal Court:
Zekeriya Öz (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Fikret Seçen (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Süleyman Pehlivan (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Mehmet Ali Pekgüzel (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Nihat Taşkın (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Ercan Şafak (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Mehmet Murat Yönder (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Mehmet Murat Dalku (Former Istanbul Prosecutor)
Hasan Hüseyin Özese (Former Istanbul 13th ACM Member Judge)
Hüsnü Çalmuk (Old Istanbul 13th ACM Member Judge)
Metin Özçelik (Former Istanbul 11th ACM Member Judge)
Ömer Diken (Former Istanbul 13th ACM Member Judge)
Mehmet Karababa (Former Istanbul 12th ACM Member Judge)
Dr. Sedat Sami Haşıloğlu (Former Istanbul 13th ACM Member Judge)
Davut Bedir (Former Istanbul 10th ACM Member Judge)
İdris Asan (Former Istanbul 9th ACM Member Judge)
Rüstem Eryılmaz (Former Istanbul 14th ACM Member Judge)
Yakup Hakan Günay (Former Istanbul 14th ACM Member Judge)
Ali Efendi Peksak (Former Istanbul 10th ACM Member Judge)
Murat Üründü (Former Istanbul 10th ACM Member Judge)
VICTIMS OF THE CONSPIRACY ARE WAITING FOR JUSTICE
The following names are among the victims and complainants who are the targets of the FETO judiciary during the process in which prosecution permission was given by the decision of the HSK 2nd Chamber dated October 14, 2021:
Ahmet Tatar (brother of the late Lieutenant Colonel Ali Tatar)
Ergun Poyraz
Hikmet Cicek
Kemal Kerinçsiz
Kemal Yalçın Alemdaroğlu
Mustafa Donmez
Mustafa Hüseyin Buzoğlu
Mustafa Levent Göktaş
Nusret Senem
Oktay Yildirim
Serdar Öztürk
Tunçer Kılınç
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The trial process will begin and court decisions will be made.
Very likely · Within months
Victims or their representatives will testify during the trial.
Likely · Within months

The 22nd hearing has been completed in the trial of FETO's fugitive prosecutors Zekeriya Öz, Cihan Kansız and Mehmet Yüzgeç. The prosecutor requested that the case be dropped for the defendants on the grounds of statute of limitations. The court stated that the case will continue on October 6. Experts emphasized that the special nature of organized crimes and investigation-reinforcement permit periods should be evaluated separately.

The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals overturned the dismissal decision, stating that it was erroneous to exclude the worker's weekly holiday pay from the overtime account, and argued that the worker's severance and notice pay should be paid.

Gaziantep Deputy Sevda Karaca reacted to the decision in the Ezgi Apartment case, in which 35 people lost their lives in the February 6 earthquakes, and said that the decision was not a punishment for the murderers, but for the families of the lost lives. He criticized the release of the defendants and emphasized that he did not say that his struggle would end until justice was served.
Istanbul Regional Court of Justice 22nd Criminal Chamber completed its appeal review regarding Seçil Erzan's 102 years and 4 months imprisonment sentence for aggravated fraud and forgery of private documents, and decided to overturn the decision and send the file to the local court for retrial. Erzan stated that he did not establish a system in his defense and could not receive sufficient legal support, and it was decided to continue his detention.

The Association of Contemporary Lawyers reacted to the decision of the Kahramanmaraş 4th High Criminal Court in the Ezgi Apartment case, where 35 people lost their lives in the February 6 earthquakes, and stated that releases were provided through amnesties before the execution of the sentences was completed, that the judicial system prioritizes the benefit of the capital, not human life, and that it stands by the families of the earthquake in their fight for the decision to be overturned and the maximum punishment in the appeal and appeal processes.

Vahit Bıçak, the lawyer of Hasan İsmail Hikmet, who killed Ceren Damar Şenel in the tragedy in 2019, postponed the execution of the prison sentence of 1 year, 5 months and 15 days given to Şenel for his statements, for one year. Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor's Office approved the postponement, citing the intensity of legal work, chronic diabetes and psychological unpreparedness.