
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals overturned the dismissal decision, stating that it was erroneous to exclude the worker's weekly holiday pay from the overtime account, and argued that the worker's severance and notice pay should be paid.
AI-generated summary
The worker claimed that he was dismissed, stating that his employment contract was terminated verbally and verbally by the employer. He applied to the Labor Court and the decision was later appealed.
Claiming that he was unfairly dismissed, the welder went to the Labor Court. Stating that the employment contract was terminated verbally and verbally by the employer, the worker argued that his contract was terminated without being asked whether he had any excuse in case of absence. Claiming that this situation was against the practices of the Supreme Court, the worker stated that severance and notice pay should be paid to him.
The decision was later taken to appeal. The Regional Court of Justice (BAM) annulled the decision of the first instance court, made a new judgment and decided to accept the case. After the defendant employer appealed the decision, the file came to the 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court reminded that the employee's weekly holiday pay was requested separately and this receivable was ruled by the court.
The Supreme Court ruled that 7.5 hours of work on a weekday should be excluded from the overtime calculation. For this reason, it was decided that the decision was wrong and the verdict was overturned.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The employer will have to pay compensation.
Likely · Within weeks

The 22nd hearing has been completed in the trial of FETO's fugitive prosecutors Zekeriya Öz, Cihan Kansız and Mehmet Yüzgeç. The prosecutor requested that the case be dropped for the defendants on the grounds of statute of limitations. The court stated that the case will continue on October 6. Experts emphasized that the special nature of organized crimes and investigation-reinforcement permit periods should be evaluated separately.

In its objection against 21 former prosecutors and judges, the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office stated that the transactions were not simple judicial errors, but constituted the crimes of "Violation of the Constitution" within the scope of Article 309 of the Turkish Penal Code and "Torture" within the scope of Article 94 of the Turkish Penal Code. The names of the people to be tried were listed and the victims included those who were the targets of the FETO judiciary.

Gaziantep Deputy Sevda Karaca reacted to the decision in the Ezgi Apartment case, in which 35 people lost their lives in the February 6 earthquakes, and said that the decision was not a punishment for the murderers, but for the families of the lost lives. He criticized the release of the defendants and emphasized that he did not say that his struggle would end until justice was served.
Istanbul Regional Court of Justice 22nd Criminal Chamber completed its appeal review regarding Seçil Erzan's 102 years and 4 months imprisonment sentence for aggravated fraud and forgery of private documents, and decided to overturn the decision and send the file to the local court for retrial. Erzan stated that he did not establish a system in his defense and could not receive sufficient legal support, and it was decided to continue his detention.

The Association of Contemporary Lawyers reacted to the decision of the Kahramanmaraş 4th High Criminal Court in the Ezgi Apartment case, where 35 people lost their lives in the February 6 earthquakes, and stated that releases were provided through amnesties before the execution of the sentences was completed, that the judicial system prioritizes the benefit of the capital, not human life, and that it stands by the families of the earthquake in their fight for the decision to be overturned and the maximum punishment in the appeal and appeal processes.

Vahit Bıçak, the lawyer of Hasan İsmail Hikmet, who killed Ceren Damar Şenel in the tragedy in 2019, postponed the execution of the prison sentence of 1 year, 5 months and 15 days given to Şenel for his statements, for one year. Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor's Office approved the postponement, citing the intensity of legal work, chronic diabetes and psychological unpreparedness.