
AI-generated summary
The suspension of Schengen between Italy and Spain began this summer after the Ceuta migration crisis, when thousands of people entered the Spanish exclave irregularly from Morocco. Italy had initially suspended the agreement for a month, then extended the measure to August and mid-September.
The decision of the Minister of the Interior, Matteo Piantedosi, came after the meeting of the Analysis Committee for Immigration and Border Security. Air and sea border controls therefore remain active. The decision is based on "the current situation in the Spanish exclave of Ceuta and, in particular, the continuation of the critical issues already encountered"
Border controls with Spain remain in force. This was decided by the Minister of the Interior, Matteo Piantedosi, after having heard the Analysis Committee for Immigration and Border Security, which met this morning (30 September). The extension of the Schengen suspension will last 15 days, with checks at the air and sea borders therefore remaining active. The decision is based on "the current situation in the Spanish exclave of Ceuta and, in particular, the continuation of the critical issues already encountered".
The suspension of Schengen after the Ceuta crisis and the extensions
It all started this summer, with the Ceuta migration crisis, when thousands of people irregularly entered the Spanish exclave from Morocco at the end of July. Italy had therefore decided to suspend - in the first instance - the Schengen agreement with Madrid for a month and to restore some controls in ports and airports from 1 August. After that, Rome has always extended the suspension from time to time - in August and then again in mid-September - until today. Spain has always harshly criticized the Italian government's decisions on the issue and reacted by activating the possibility of in turn carrying out checks on travelers coming from Italy in Spanish ports and airports.
In-depth analysis
Meloni: "Preserve the Schengen area only if the EU borders are defended"
How Schengen works and when it can be suspended
By the Schengen area he means a European area in which, under normal conditions, systematic checks are not carried out at the internal borders between the states that are part of it. This allows people to move from one country to another more easily and quickly, without normally having to show their passport at each border. This space includes most of the countries of the European Union, but does not completely coincide with it. In fact, some non-EU countries, such as Switzerland, Norway and Iceland, are part of the Schengen area. On the contrary, some EU countries are not part of it, such as Ireland. However, the agreement provides for controls at the external borders, while internally the free movement of people is guaranteed. However, in exceptional situations, such as serious security threats, health emergencies or particular immigration problems, a State may temporarily reintroduce internal border controls. This measure must necessarily be justified and notified to the EU. Not only that: generally speaking, it must have a limited duration. In recent years, controls have been reintroduced several times in the Schengen area. It happened mainly due to terrorist attacks and measures taken during the Covid-19 pandemic.
In-depth analysis
How many times was the Schengen area "suspended" in the 2000s?
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Spain may activate controls on travelers coming from Italy in response to Italian measures
Possible · Within weeks
The Interior Ministry has extended air and sea border controls with Spain for another 15 days, maintaining the halt in Schengen. It is the third extension since the migration crisis at the end of July, when around 60 thousand migrants arrived in Ceuta, many of them minors. The decision, taken after the Immigration and Border Security Review Committee, aims to strengthen border protection and prevent terrorist threats. Spain could extend controls on travelers from Italy beyond October 7.

The President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella has issued the decree law on urgent measures to guarantee the regular start of the 2026/2027 school year, the accompaniment of the measures of the Pnrr under the responsibility of the Ministry of Education and Merit, the promotion of the integration of foreign students and higher education and research, authorizing the presentation of the conversion bill to the Chambers.

President Sergio Mattarella has issued a decree law to guarantee the start of the 2026/2027 school year, implement measures of the Pnrr under the responsibility of the Ministry of Education, promote the integration of foreign students and intervene in the field of higher education and research, authorizing the presentation of the conversion bill to the Chambers.

The Minister of European Affairs Tommaso Foti states that the Italian State will ask for compensation in the Regeni case once the sentence has been filed, thanks to the establishment of a civil party, and underlines the importance of French collaboration on the Ustica massacre after 46 years.

The Minister of Environment and Energy Security Gilberto Pichetto Fratin arrived in Algiers to participate in the second Penta-Ministerial meeting on the Southern Hydrogen Corridor, underlining the role of hydrogen for the decarbonisation and energy security of Italy and Algeria, and confirming the collaboration between the two countries within the framework of the Mattei Plan.

The Constitutional Affairs Commission of the Chamber approved the mandate to the rapporteur on the bill against anti-Semitism, but the final vote saw divisions: majority and Italia Viva in favor, M5S, Avs and Futuro Nazionale against, +Europa abstained and Pd not participating. The text, already passed to the Senate, should be voted on by the House by mid-October, although the dates are uncertain. The central issue is the definition of anti-Semitism borrowed from the IHRA, which the opposition fears could criminalize legitimate criticism of Israel. Liliana Segre asked for changes for unanimous approval, while the Democratic Party is split between favorable reformists and internal opponents. Several Jewish intellectuals signed a document against the bill, accusing it of delegitimizing anti-Zionist positions, while the UCEI defends it as a necessary tool against anti-Semitism without prohibiting criticism of Israel.