
Court demands guarantees about health conditions and prison treatment to proceed with the Brazilian request
AI-generated summary
The case involves requests for the extradition of former deputy Carla Zambelli for crimes committed in Brazil. The Italian Court analyzes the request's compliance with international treaties.
In July, the Italian court annulled the extradition and ordered that the request presented by Brazil be subjected to a new trial, returning to the initial phase.
The Italian court dismissed the thesis of political persecution, which was alleged by Zambelli's defense. But he understood that it was necessary to present more guarantees from the Brazilian government and the Federal Supreme Court (STF) about the former congresswoman's health conditions (such as fibromyalgia and fainting) and the treatment she would receive in the prison system in Brazil.
The new hearing in Italy was scheduled for October 29, after the second round of the presidential elections in Brazil. The decision does not address Zambelli's guilt or innocence nor does it reassess the sentence imposed by Brazilian justice.
In the extradition procedure, the Italian Court is only responsible for verifying whether the request meets the requirements set out in legislation and international treaties so that the defendant's surrender is authorized.
The episode occurred on the eve of the second round of the 2022 elections. On that occasion, the then-deputy chased, armed, a man through the streets of the Jardins neighborhood, in São Paulo (SP), after a political discussion.
In May, Italy's Supreme Court of Cassation rejected Zambelli's extradition in another case, her sentence to 10 years in prison for hacking into the systems of the National Council of Justice (CNJ).
According to the judges, Alexandre de Moraes accumulated different roles throughout the process and acted simultaneously as a member of the judging panel and as a person considered harmed by one of the crimes attributed to the deputy.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
New extradition hearing on October 29.
Very likely · Within months

The suspension of the Master case by the presidency of the STF a month ago is preventing requests from the Federal Police for investigations and analyzes of the release of prisoners. Investigators and defenses criticize the lack of definition regarding measures that depend on the approval of the Supreme Court, with Minister André Mendonça maintained as rapporteur, but the cases linked to President Luiz Edson Fachin.

MPF and Instituto Preservar allege that emissions from Shell's fossil fuel chain contributed to global warming and intensified the rains that caused flooding in Rio Grande do Sul in 2024, using three types of climate attribution to establish a causal link, without attributing exclusive responsibility to the company.

The number of legal actions against the INSS grew 21% in 2026, reaching 2.24 million new cases and a total of 4.5 million in the Judiciary, driven by denials of benefits and failures highlighted by the TCU.

Minister Edson Fachin requested material from the Federal Police regarding summons to magistrates in the Master case. The movement puts pressure on the STF and deepens internal crises in the Court, which involves references to ministers and relatives.

Approved in a public competition for professor at IFRS, Manoella Treis, diagnosed with autism and an autoimmune disease, was denied tenure by the medical board. The institute alleged geographic incompatibility and a lack of healthcare infrastructure in Veranópolis. The researcher appeals to Justice.

The Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (TRF-3) suspended the injunction that allowed the betting platform Stake to continue operating in Brazil until October 25, in response to a request from the Federal Attorney General's Office. The decision does not judge the merit of the action, but removes the company's temporary judicial protection, allowing the government to implement the restrictions of the provisional measure that extinguishes betting authorizations.