Kabaiş's lawyer announced new suspicious points regarding the loss of Rojin
Quick Look
- Kabaiş's lawyer, Abdurrahman Karabulut, stated that four suspicious points were identified regarding the loss of Rojin in the report of the expert in Mersin.
- These include communication with Mehmet Çelik, private security guard movements, the suspect carrying heavy objects in the house, and the contradiction between the roommate's statement and base/GPS records.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The investigation into Rojin's disappearance continues. Lawyer Abdurrahman Karabulut shared the report of an expert assigned to Mersin and stated that four suspicious points were detected in this report.
Kabaiş's family's lawyer, Abdurrahman Karabulut, stated that the examination of the HTS, base and camera records in the file by an expert they appointed in Mersin was completed and the report was received. Stating that four important suspicious points were included in the report, Karabulut announced that they submitted new investigation requests to the prosecutor's office in line with the findings. Karabulut listed the findings in the report as follows:
1 - The first point that draws attention is the correspondence Rojin had with a person named Mehmet Çelik, whom she addressed as 'teacher', shortly before she disappeared. In the investigation, it was determined that the phone belonging to this name received the signal from the same base station as Rojin. There are two people with the same name in the file, one of them is a former police officer and the other is an administrative unit officer at the university. It has not yet been determined which Mehmet Çelik the correspondence was with. It seems that both phones receive signals from the same base area.
2 - The second suspicious point in the report is the movements of the private security guard in the area where Rojin's mobile phone was found. Rojin's phone was found by students on the beach around 10.15 in the morning. Approximately 11 minutes ago, camera footage shows that a private security guard was in that area and remained in the bushes for 48 seconds. Then, there is a suspicion that the security guard who left the area may have left the phone there or was spying on the people who left the phone. This needs to be clarified.
3 - The third point is that on the evening Rojin disappeared, suspicious activity was seen in a house in Bardakçı village. Two men and a woman drag a heavy object they took out of the white vehicle and take it into the house. The next morning, the same object is taken out of the house and put back into the vehicle. These images have not been adequately researched to date. We are considering the possibility that Rojin may have been kept in this house for a while after she was killed or knocked unconscious. There is a serious suspicion that the object carried could be Rojin. However, this is not a definitive determination yet. For this reason, we wanted to investigate the identities of the people and their HTS movements.
4 - The fourth important point in the report is that Rojin's roommate stated in his statement that he was in his room in the dormitory at around 22.30. However, base, GPS and tourniquet records do not match this statement.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The prosecutor's office will evaluate new investigation requests submitted by the lawyer and may initiate additional investigations.
Likely · Within days
The images of the suspicious movement and the moving object seen in the house in Bardakçı village will be examined in more detail.
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Couldn't it be determined who Mehmet Çelik was in the correspondence?
- Did the private security guard leave the phone and leave the area?
- Was the object carried in the house in Bardakçı village Rojin?
- Why is there a discrepancy between the roommate's statement and the base/GPS records?






