
Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram filed a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court in the case of Piotr Niemczyk, who is serving an alternative prison sentence.
AI-generated summary
Piotr Niemczyk was convicted of participating in a road blockade in May 2025 and is serving an alternative prison sentence.
The Office of the Ombudsman announced on Friday that Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram filed a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court in the Piotr Niemczyk case. A former oppositionist of the Polish People's Republic was sentenced by a Warsaw court for participating in blocking the road during a protest by climate activists from the Last Generation in May 2025. After refusing to perform community service, Niemczyk began serving a 15-day substitute arrest sentence.
The Commissioner for Human Rights requests the annulment of the verdict, acquittal of Niemczyk and immediate suspension of the execution of the sentence. As the spokesman's office emphasizes, the collected evidence - including police recordings - does not confirm the allegations against Niemczyk and indicates significant doubts as to his responsibility.
Doubts surrounding the penal order judgment
The Ombudsman accused the court of gross violation of procedural law.
"This consisted in assuming that the guilt and circumstances of the acts attributed to the accused were beyond doubt, which led to the issuance of a penal order," reads the press release from the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights.
The analysis of the case files showed that the police official note collectively treats a group of 26 people who were supposed to block traffic on the road. However, recordings from police body-worn cameras not only do not confirm Niemczyk's participation in the blockade, but also indicate that he was standing on the sidewalk the entire time, not breaking the law or obstructing traffic.
Appeal from opposition groups
More than 40 former oppositionists of the Polish People's Republic came to the defense of Niemczyk and other convicts and appealed to the Ombudsman and the Minister of Justice, Waldemar Żurek, to file a cassation appeal. The signatories of the appeal considered both the verdict and the actions of the justice system unacceptable in a democratic state of law.
Among the people who signed the appeal were, among others: Teresa Bogucka, Zbigniew Bujak, Władysław Frasyniuk, Andrzej Seweryn and Jerzy Stępień. In their opinion, Niemczyk's case is not only an individual case, but also a test for the Polish justice system and respect for civil rights.
What next with the Piotr Niemczyk case?
The Commissioner for Human Rights emphasizes that the court should not have issued a penal order against Niemczyk because the evidence did not provide sufficient certainty as to his guilt. In the cassation appeal, attention was drawn to the need to examine the case at a hearing and clarify all doubts.
Piotr Niemczyk is currently serving a prison sentence, but the Ombudsman demands that his execution be immediately suspended until the Supreme Court considers the cassation appeal.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Recognition of the cassation appeal by the Supreme Court
Likely · Within weeks

The commander of the border guard decided to expel a 44-year-old Ukrainian from Poland who poses a threat to state security. The man is waiting for deportation in a center for foreigners, and the prosecutor's office is still investigating.

The District Court in Warsaw annulled the fine of PLN 3,000. PLN imposed on Beata Szydło by the prosecutor's office for failing to appear for questioning. The court found that the immunity of an MEP protects against such a penalty. The prosecutor's office announces that a new hearing date will be scheduled.

An investigation is underway into the plane crash in Radom on August 28, 2025, in which Major Maciej Krakowian died. Dozens of people were interrogated, and the key evidence is the pilot's personal camera. No one has been charged so far.

The prosecutor's office in Lublin discontinued the investigation into a year ago when a missile from a fighter jet hit a building in Wyryki. It was found that the so-called counter-type excluding the perpetrator's liability.

The CJEU ruled that EU law does not impose a specific model for settling invalid Swiss franc contracts and allows the use of the balance theory, provided that Polish law allows it and does not weaken consumer protection.

The Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights filed a report on suspicion of committing a crime by Julia Przyłębska, accusing her of unlawfully changing the composition of judges at the Constitutional Tribunal in 2015-2020 in order to influence judgments. Przyłębska firmly denies the accusations.