
The court agreed with the two applicants, but ruled that this did not automatically result in a right to compensation
AI-generated summary
The dispute concerned the compliance of border controls with the Schengen Borders Code. The complainants argued that the controls that have been carried out for many years are not consistent with EU regulations because ordering border controls requires the sudden appearance of migratory movements, which cannot be determined with subsequent extensions of six months each.
Thus, the court agreed with the two applicants. As the court said in a statement, both the controls ordered by the ministry at the borders with the Czech Republic and Poland, as well as the contested actions against both complainants, were unlawful.
The Pole filed a complaint
The first complaint was filed by a Polish citizen who lives with his family in Goerlitz and visits the remaining family members living in Zgorzelec almost every day. He challenged the verification of his identity and the search of his minibus by the German police in September 2024, when after crossing the Old Town Bridge he was detained in Germany.
The officers demanded to see the document and to see the vehicle, which, apart from the bicycle, had no objects or people in it.
Complaint by a German citizen
The second complaint was filed by a German citizen living in Michendorf in Brandenburg, who travels to the Czech Republic several times a year, including: to friendly musicians.
He challenged the establishment of his identity in May this year, when he was returning from Prague by a replacement bus, which the German police stopped at a border control point. All bus passengers were subject to document verification.
The decision may be appealed against
The dispute concerned the compatibility of these checks with the Schengen Borders Code. The complainants argued that the controls that have been carried out for many years are not consistent with EU regulations because ordering border controls requires the sudden appearance of migratory movements, which cannot be determined with subsequent extensions of six months each.
The court in Dresden only ruled that the inspections were illegal at the time, and this did not automatically result in the right to compensation.
Due to the fundamental importance of the case, going beyond two individual cases of control on the German-Polish and German-Czech borders, the ruling of the court in Dresden may be appealed to the higher administrative court in Bautzen.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The higher court in Bautzen will hear the appeal against the ruling of the court in Dresden
Likely · Within weeks

Prime Minister Donald Tusk provided information about the talks in Dublin with the participation of the US and European countries. The meeting concerned the effects of the visit of Donald Trump's envoys to Moscow, where the conditions for ending the war in Ukraine and the future security system were discussed.

Łukasz Gibała proposes the creation of a Security and Monitoring Center in Krakow. The Małopolska voivode said that the condition of the 11 people injured in the November 7 attack was improving and the prosecutor's office was continuing its investigation into the attack.

In the latest polls by United Surveys for WP and Pollster for Super Express, the Civic Coalition is clearly leading with support of 30-34%. Law and Justice recorded a record low result of 15.5-22%.

The National Prosecutor's Office presented charges to the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Władysław Teofil Bartoszewski, including: misappropriation of property. Deputy Speaker of the Sejm Piotr Zgorzelski said that his resignation is on the Prime Minister's desk.

Poland won the vote for the UN Joint Inspection Unit (JIU), defeating Russia by one vote. The Polish representative in the years 2028–2032 will be Jakub Chmielewski.

The Gdańsk-Śródmieście District Prosecutor's Office summoned President Karol Nawrocki to question the case regarding the takeover of Jerzy Ż's apartment. in the years 2012-2017. The letter was sent on November 9 to the address of the Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland, and the date of action was left to the choice of the head of state. The investigation concerns suspected fraud and was initiated on June 13, 2025.