
According to a Terna study presented at the hearing in the Chamber, maintaining daylight saving time all year round would lead to greater energy savings compared to the current regime of double seasonal change, with a reduction in electricity consumption estimated at 462 GWh per year by 2026 thanks to the greater efficiency of lighting and the spread of renewables.
AI-generated summary
Summer time was introduced in Italy in 1916 for war reasons, initially to gain an hour of light in the late afternoon. Over time it has become a tool for reducing artificial lighting consumption by making better use of natural light.
Before arriving at the result of the investigation, it should be remembered that solar time indicates the standard time (also called conventional civil time or standard summer time) associated with the reference meridian of a country's time zone: in Italy it corresponds to UTC+1 and is in force in the autumn and winter months. Daylight saving time, on the other hand, is the convention by which clocks are brought forward by 60 minutes (to UTC+2 in Italy) for a limited period of the year, mainly with the aim of reducing energy consumption linked to artificial lighting in the evening hours.
You might also be interested in: Solar time change like a mini jet lag, the possible effects on the organism
During the hearing, the eighteenth-century origins of summer time were recalled, which then found its first regulatory application during the First World War: in 1916 the United Kingdom adopted British Summer Time and the United States introduced, in 1918, Daylight Saving Time, two ploys to "gain" an extra hour of light in the late afternoon. In Italy, summer time was introduced for the first time, for the same war reasons, in 1916. Going forward in time, summer time became a tool for saving energy: by moving the time forward to make better use of natural light, the hours of artificial lighting in the evening hours were reduced.
During the Committee hearings in the Chamber, a brief was presented by Terna S.p.a., manager of the national electricity transmission network, based on the analysis of three scenarios: the current regime with double seasonal change, a hypothetical permanent solar time regime and a hypothetical permanent summer time regime. "From the analysis carried out with reference to the period 2015-2026, and with a projection to 2030 which takes into account the growing diffusion of non-programmable renewable sources, it emerged that the electricity demand curve relating to the permanent summer time scenario is always the most contained of the three scenarios considered, although the three curves have undergone a progressive approximation over the most recent years", we read in the results of the survey. The reason, "most likely", is the greater energy efficiency of lighting systems compared to the past.
Terna has estimated that for 2026 the current regime (seven months of summer time) would lead to a reduction in consumption of approximately 302 GWh, to which a further approximately 160 GWh would be added if summer time were also extended to the winter months, for an overall annual benefit of approximately 462 GWh (according to the data released by Terna in January 2026, the overall national electricity requirement is equal to approximately 311.3 TWh in 2025).
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
By 2026, the permanent adoption of summer time would lead to annual savings of approximately 462 GWh of electricity in Italy.
Possible · Within months

Division in the European Union on the Ets 2 system: Italy, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary ask for price increases to be postponed to 2030, while the Nordic countries and Portugal defend the stability of climate rules.

The European Council invites the EU Commission to update the assessment of all the impacts of ETS2, in particular on the structure and safeguard measures, after a long conflict between the 27 member states. The text of the conclusions reiterates the need for a functioning, transparent and predictable carbon market to reduce price volatility and mitigate the impact on electricity costs, preserving the role of the ETS in the climate transition.

Italian hauliers are threatening a national shutdown due to rising fuel prices, with blockades already active in Puglia and planned in Calabria and Sicily. The Meloni government has convened a meeting at the Ministry of Transport for 27 October, while Conftrasporto and Unatras are asking for immediate action to release the resources allocated in May and further allocations against expensive diesel, which has increased by over 50 cents per liter since the start of the war. The crisis is worsened by the strike at the Taranto refinery and the depletion of stocks in numerous service stations in the South, causing queues and chaos for urban mobility.

The Senate has approved the Energy Decree which introduces replacement powers to unblock 38 onshore hydrocarbon exploration and extraction practices still in the Regions.

Fuel emergency in Cosenza and other provinces of Calabria and Puglia due to the shortage of petrol and diesel supplies. Queues at distributors and protests by farmers and hauliers against expensive diesel fuel and price increases.

Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni ruled out that a new import of Russian gas would reduce prices. Eni and Edison were also asked about energy flows and the European countries that continue purchases from Moscow.