
New regulations coming into effect on 6 November aim to curb violent content and its normalization among young people.
Starting 6 November, the UK government will criminalize the possession and publication of online pornography depicting strangulation, incest, or adult role-playing as children, following a review on the normalization of violent sexual content.
AI-generated summary
The legislation follows a 2025 review into pornography regulation which identified the prevalence of choking depictions on popular sites. Non-fatal strangulation is already a criminal offence in cases of non-consent.
Online pornography depicting strangulation or incestuous relationships will be banned from early November, the government has announced.
From 6 November, it will be illegal to possess or publish porn which shows strangulation or suffocation, depicts sexual activity between people who are related or shows adults role-playing as children under 16.
The new rules follow a review into porn regulation in 2025 which found depictions of choking were "rife" on popular porn sites and had helped normalise the act among young people.
Conservative peer Baroness Gabby Bertin, who headed the review, said the news came "not a moment too soon".
She told the Press Association the change in law would "send the unequivocal signal" to companies that host and facilitate porn, and also to wider society, that "extreme and violent content that encourages real-life harm is not acceptable".
Her independent review, commissioned by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's government, cited an account of a 14-year-old boy asking a teacher how to choke girls during sex.
It warned that people imitating such behaviour "may face devastating consequences".
Non-fatal strangulation is already an offence if someone does not consent - but its depiction online is currently not illegal.
Amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, which became law in April, sought to ensure such content would be captured by the legislation and made criminal offences in England and Wales.
Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said it was not about "criminalising harmless sexual preferences".
But she said "porn can shape what people think a healthy relationship looks like, especially young people". Content which "normalises, or even glorifies" violence against women can "blur the line with what is acceptable in real life", she said.
"If you've got this material, delete it. If you're sharing it, stop," Davies-Jones added.
"It's not as harmless as you may think, and after 6 November, it is criminal."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The ban will take effect on 6 November.
Very likely · Within months

The civil damages lawsuit for the neck-cutting case of a junior high school student in New Taipei City is still under trial. Defense lawyer Lin Yuexue questioned the victim's family's donation of 5 million yuan as a scholarship and bursary as a "deliberate transfer of assets." He publicly insulted the victim's family lawyer Li Huixuan for the second time as a "shame on the legal profession." This triggered netizens to search the bottom of the website, spoof his law firm, and flooded it with one-star negative reviews, and even renamed it "Lin Yuexue Parking Lot" on Google Maps.

Former Liberty University professor Mostan, who was indicted on charges of defaming President Lee Jae-myung, pleaded not guilty and dismissed the indictment in his first trial, arguing that the Korean court had no jurisdiction. Former Professor Tan emphasized that he made his remarks in the United States and that there was no intention to recognize false information or slander him.

The Sendai High Court will hand down the judgment of the appeal court in the Tsushima lawsuit following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident on the 16th. The plaintiffs, approximately 600 residents of the Tsushima district of Namie Town, are suing the national government and TEPCO for restoration of the original condition and compensation for damages. Although the Supreme Court denied the state's responsibility in 2022, new issues have been raised, and attention is focused on reviewing the judicial decision.

Prosecutor Liu from the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office was granted deferred prosecution because of his good attitude as a first-time drug offender. People's Party Chairman Huang Guochang criticized the prosecutor for covering up his scandal. Jianqing's reform statement countered, quoting Ko Wenzhe's quote "Treat drug addicts as patients, not prisoners", pointing out that deferred prosecution treatment requires medical treatment at one's own expense and regular urine tests. Violators will face revocation or imprisonment. He questioned Huang Guochang's remarks as stupid and ignorant or maliciously incited confrontation. He also emphasized that the policy has been implemented for more than 18 years, and the deferred prosecution rate for first-time offenders exceeds 70%.

The Xicheng District People's Court of Beijing released typical cases involving the protection of the rights and interests of the elderly and disclosed two fraud cases targeting the elderly: one involved health care fraud, in which the defendants Li and Yang attracted the elderly with free activities, health lectures, etc., and fabricated their medical conditions to induce them to buy products at high prices, defrauding 8 people of more than 170,000 yuan; the other was a collectibles fraud, in which the defendants Yue and Yang posed as intermediaries and buyers, charging traceability fees and other fees under the guise of high-priced repurchases, defrauding 6 people of more than 220,000 yuan. After the trial, the court held that the defendant's behavior constituted a crime of fraud, and sentenced nine people including Yang to fixed-term imprisonment of six months to four years and eight months. Yue and Yang were each sentenced to three years and nine months and fined 35,000 yuan. The defendant has fully refunded the compensation, and all the victims' economic losses have been recovered.

In the appeal trial of Mr. Kim, a man in his 40s, who was indicted on charges of calling the May 18 Democratization Movement a riot, the Daegu District Court's Criminal Appeal Division 2-3 overturned the original trial's sentence of a fine of 1 million won and declared him not guilty. The court ruled that the defendant's actions were reprehensible, but that writing 'riot' did not state facts but rather posted opinions.