This is how the court databases are sued - to remove the judgments

Crime hoax

Sexual molestation of children (seven cases). A man convicted of sexually molesting a child in his home on several occasions is suing the site. The documents state that the site agrees to delete the man's sentence from its database. The suit is then withdrawn.

Incitement against ethnic group. A man sues the Crimean hoax, and then withdraws his suit. Among other things, the man is convicted of incitement against a group of people after repeatedly using coarse racist expletives against passengers on a train. The verdict is not available at Krimfup today.

Mr Koll

Serious violation of women's rights. A man convicted of assaulting his girlfriend on two occasions is suing Mr Koll, demanding that all records of him be removed. After the man was deleted from the site, he withdraws his claim.

Fraud. A woman convicted of fraud is suing Mr Koll for gross defamation. The parties settle. The woman is not in the database today.

Lexbase

Abuse of women. A man convicted of misdemeanor assault after crashing his girlfriend's car and hitting her in the face sued Lexbase to have his convictions expunged.

The man withdraws his claim after a few days, and writes that he has come to an agreement with the company. The assault verdict is not available on Lexbase today.

Serious accounting offence. A company executive is suing Lexbase demanding that an old financial crime conviction be removed from the site. The man wants damages as the verdict prevented him from getting a high position in business. The parties settle and Lexbase removes the judgment.

Lexbase

Regarding settlements, we are limited to go into detail. Lexbase publishes thousands of articles every year, which means that very high demands are placed on the published content. Like all other publishers, we can make mistakes in how we express ourselves or what we report, and then we have to correct or correct the published articles - something that can take the form of settlements in Swedish courts.

Our journalistic decisions and rules regarding what is monitored and published are applied completely consistently to everyone, without any special treatment whatsoever.

Crime hoax

The company has not responded.

Mr Koll

The right to request erasure has always existed, but based on the changing jurisprudence of recent years, we and our competitors have made it easier for an individual to request an erasure.

SVT: But on your website it says the opposite, that Mr. Koll "usually does not delete information that has been published"?

Regarding the website, I have to blame the human factor: it is simply wrong and will be updated.

Today, everyone is free to request that their data be deleted.