
AI-generated summary
Türkiye has been discussing the fire safety inspection of buildings, especially after the Kartalkaya fire disaster. In this context, the Court of Accounts shared its findings regarding dormitories in its audit report on the Ministry of Youth and Sports.
While Türkiye was discussing the fire safety audit of buildings, especially after the Kartalkaya fire disaster, the findings made by the Court of Accounts regarding dormitories in the audit report of the Ministry of Youth and Sports attracted attention. In the report, it was noted that the building occupancy permits (settlement) of some of the buildings expropriated as dormitories were not delivered to the provincial directorates and the fire brigade report regarding the fire resistance of the buildings was left to the settlement process.
It was emphasized that this situation poses a risk for the safety of students. In the report, the ministry's evaluation against this determination was shared with the following expressions: "It has been stated that the work on obtaining reports by the public administration that the expropriated buildings comply with the fire regulations at the stage before the admission of students to the dormitory will be carried out by the provincial directorates."
EXPROPRIATION OF UNCOMPLETED DORMITORIES
The report also noted that some dormitories that were still under construction were expropriated at a price as if they were completed. In the report, which stated that this situation was against the Expropriation Law, it was stated that the ministry cited the "urgent need for a dormitory" as the reason for this situation. On the other hand, the report shared the opinion that "It is considered appropriate not to expropriate the incomplete buildings for a price determined by taking into account their finished state, citing the urgency of the work and the fact that the process will take longer."

According to the Court of Accounts' External Audit General Evaluation Report, a total of 10 thousand 783 findings were detected in the reports of public administrations submitted to the Turkish Grand National Assembly and the reports sent to local administrations. These findings include errors affecting financial reports and statements, deficiencies in regulatory compliance, and inefficiencies in financial management and internal control systems. In addition, deficiencies regarding the accountability of public administrations were also noted in the report.

The Court of Accounts Report for 2025 stated that deficiencies in the preparation of the Ministry of Health's implementation projects and tender documents led to cost increases and project delays. Findings such as insufficient contract periods in Antalya Aksu and Diyarbakır Hani hospitals, incompatible projects, incorrect examination records of intensive care patients and lack of final completion documents in city hospitals were included.

The Court of Accounts determined that BRSA's car rental tender was followed by a bargaining procedure contrary to the public tender law, that the required hardware features in the vehicles were unnecessary, and that the lights in the service building remained on 24 hours a day. It was also stated that some managerial appointments were accepted as 'A' level without performance evaluation.

The Court of Accounts reported that there was a weakness in the control of the road maintenance works of the General Directorate of Highways and that administrative fines were not reflected in the financial statements. It was also stated that canoeing activities in the Bosphorus were uncontrolled.

An analysis that argues that the concept of the social state in Türkiye has weakened due to neoliberal policies and reforms, that increasing inequalities in education, health and retirement systems are emphasized, and that rights-based policies are required instead of social aid.

In its reports for 2025, the Court of Accounts announced findings of irregularities in the distribution of authority, such as the inadequate uncontrolled transfer of the income from the open education faculties of the Council of Higher Education, a difference of 10 billion TL in the balance sheet, not reflecting a renovation payment in the ÖSYM account, and not using the YÖKAK's logo in the certification processes.