
An analysis that argues that the concept of the social state in Türkiye has weakened due to neoliberal policies and reforms, that increasing inequalities in education, health and retirement systems are emphasized, and that rights-based policies are required instead of social aid.
AI-generated summary
In the second article of the Turkish Constitution, it is stated that there is a social state of law, but over the years, neoliberal economic policies and social security reforms have weakened the social state concept.
The concept of social state refers to an understanding that aims to provide a minimum standard of living to its citizens, reduce income inequalities, and provide everyone with access to basic services such as education and health.
In the second article of the Constitution, it is stated that Turkey is a state of social law. On the other hand, neoliberal economic policies implemented over the years and changes made in the field of social security have led to a gradual weakening of the social state concept.
INEQUALITY FROM EDUCATION TO HEALTH
One of the areas where this erosion is felt the most is education. Aside from the incentives for private schools, the problems experienced in public schools have further escalated the debate on equal opportunities in education. Due to the inequality in income distribution, high-income families can provide more education opportunities for their children, while low-income families' options are gradually decreasing. Thus, education moves away from being an equal public service for everyone and turns into an area where different opportunities emerge depending on the economic status of the family.
A similar situation exists in the field of health. With the city hospitals model and general health insurance practice, the financing and delivery of health services has turned into a more complex structure. While citizens benefit from health services, they may face additional payments in some cases. In terms of the nature of the right to health, it is necessary to discuss not only the number of hospitals or investments made, but also to what extent and under what conditions people can access these services.
RETIREMENT SYSTEM WAS ALSO AFFECTED
The social security and retirement system has also been significantly affected by this transformation. With the Social Security and General Health Insurance Law, which came into force in 2006, various changes were made in retirement conditions, and the retirement age and premium payment conditions were gradually increased.
Reducing the monthly pension rate also had an impact on pensions. The decrease in the reflection rate of premiums paid throughout working life on the pension has resulted in insufficient income during retirement, especially for those who work with low wages. Today, many retirees have difficulty making ends meet. The increase in rent, food and health expenses makes already limited retirement incomes even more inadequate.
NOT HELP, BUT ASSURANCE AND RIGHTS
Another consequence of the decline in the understanding of the social state is that social aid is gaining more and more importance. Instead of rights-based policies that permanently ensure citizens' social security, the emphasis on in-kind and cash aid provided to those in need creates a serious debate in terms of the understanding of the social state. Social assistance does not eliminate the root causes of poverty. Therefore, instead of managing poverty only with aid policies, it is necessary to focus on the conditions that make people constantly in need of help. The problem for Turkey's social welfare and social peace is not the existence of social aid, but why people constantly need help.
The social state should not be a system where citizens have to constantly ask for help. High inflation, high cost of living and job insecurity pose a heavier burden each day for housing, nutrition, education and health expenses for low- and fixed-income segments. The duty of the social state is to eliminate inequalities and secure the basic needs of citizens.
HALİT PAYZA AUTHOR

According to the Court of Accounts' External Audit General Evaluation Report, a total of 10 thousand 783 findings were detected in the reports of public administrations submitted to the Turkish Grand National Assembly and the reports sent to local administrations. These findings include errors affecting financial reports and statements, deficiencies in regulatory compliance, and inefficiencies in financial management and internal control systems. In addition, deficiencies regarding the accountability of public administrations were also noted in the report.

The Court of Accounts Report for 2025 stated that deficiencies in the preparation of the Ministry of Health's implementation projects and tender documents led to cost increases and project delays. Findings such as insufficient contract periods in Antalya Aksu and Diyarbakır Hani hospitals, incompatible projects, incorrect examination records of intensive care patients and lack of final completion documents in city hospitals were included.

The Court of Accounts determined that BRSA's car rental tender was followed by a bargaining procedure contrary to the public tender law, that the required hardware features in the vehicles were unnecessary, and that the lights in the service building remained on 24 hours a day. It was also stated that some managerial appointments were accepted as 'A' level without performance evaluation.

The Court of Accounts reported that there was a weakness in the control of the road maintenance works of the General Directorate of Highways and that administrative fines were not reflected in the financial statements. It was also stated that canoeing activities in the Bosphorus were uncontrolled.

In its reports for 2025, the Court of Accounts announced findings of irregularities in the distribution of authority, such as the inadequate uncontrolled transfer of the income from the open education faculties of the Council of Higher Education, a difference of 10 billion TL in the balance sheet, not reflecting a renovation payment in the ÖSYM account, and not using the YÖKAK's logo in the certification processes.

In its audit report on the Ministry of Youth and Sports, the Court of Accounts determined that the building occupancy permit certificate of some of the expropriated dormitory buildings was not delivered to the provincial directorates and the fire resistance report was left to the settlement process. The report stated that expropriating unfinished dormitories as if they were completed was also against the law.