Senior Victorian public servants hid loss of up to $285m from Covid grants given to ineligible businesses
Quick Look
An investigation by Victoria's integrity watchdog found senior public servants in the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions covered up losses from flawed Covid-19 business support payments suspected to be as high as $285 million, withholding information and creating misleading reports over an extended period.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
During the pandemic, the Victorian government spent an estimated $257m on support grants to 9,000 ineligible businesses. The investigation was triggered after whistleblowers brought allegations of corrupt conduct within the department.
Senior public servants in one state covered up losses suspected to be worth hundreds of millions arising from flawed Covid-19 business support payments, an investigation has found.
During the pandemic, the Victorian government spent an estimated $257m on support grants to 9,000 ineligible businesses.
An investigation by the integrity watchdog has found senior officials within the department responsible for making those payments covered up the extent of the losses from their managers.
“This was not a one-off event, nor was it due to an oversight,” the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission report reads.
“Decisions were made to withhold information about the magnitude of the loss and misleading information was subsequently created and disseminated over an extended period of time.”
Tabled in parliament on Thursday, the Operation Harmonia special report probed conduct by officers within the since-replaced Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions.
It concerned their response to revelations the department had granted millions in support payments to ineligible businesses during the early days of the pandemic.
By mid-2021, then-premier Daniel Andrews’ government department, was aware of potential issues relating to its use of GST as a metric, the investigation found.
When the true scale of the losses came into view, suspected to be as high as $285m, the associate secretary and deputy secretary opted to withhold that information from their superiors, the report said.
The deputy secretary directed that all information about the suspected losses be wiped from a draft report to the then-minister for Industry Support and Recovery Martin Pakula and the Victorian Auditor General’s Office, the report said.
Ibac found that in 2022, after the auditor general opened an audit of the grants, the deputy secretary prepared a brief to then-minister Ben Carroll, which contained “false and misleading” information.
That brief claimed Carroll’s predecessor, Pakula, had been aware of and approved the department’s approach to assessing grants and that no payments had been made in error, but Ibac found “the assertion that Minister Pakula was ‘fully apprised of and approved the department’s implementation approach’ was disingenuous”.
The watchdog made no adverse findings against Carroll, who now serves as Victorian premier.
Ibac commissioner Victoria Elliott said the conduct exposed by the investigation fell short of the expectations of senior public officers.
“This special report exposes serious failures by senior public officers, and informing Victorians of these findings is crucial in promoting transparency and accountability in the public sector,” she said.
The investigation was triggered after whistleblowers brought allegations of corrupt conduct within the department, which was replaced by the Department of Jobs, Skills, Industry and Regions in 2023.
“I want to applaud the whistleblowers who came forward to IBAC in Operation Harmonia,” Elliot said.
“Your bravery is critical in ensuring this conduct is not only exposed but that Victoria’s public sector can take these findings and apply the learnings to their own organisations.”
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Victorian government will implement stricter oversight and audit mechanisms for future grant programs.
Likely · Within months
Further investigations or audits may be conducted into other pandemic-related spending programs in Victoria.
Possible · Within months
Open Questions
- What specific actions will be taken against the senior officials involved in the cover-up?
- Will the misused funds be recovered, and if so, through what mechanisms?
- What systemic changes will be implemented to prevent similar failures in future grant programs?
- Were any criminal referrals made as part of the IBAC investigation?

