Trump demands the Federal Reserve cut rates or threatens to cut trade with countries with trade deficits
Quick Look
- Donald Trump pressured the Federal Reserve to sharply cut interest rates at its September 15-16 meeting, threatening to halt trade with countries with which the US runs trade deficits if it does not agree.
- The ultimatum came after a stronger-than-expected jobs report, which increases the odds of a rate hike to combat inflation.
- Trump accused the Fed of hurting the U.S. with high rates and defended his authority to act on court decisions on tariffs.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Trump has kept constant pressure on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, even after naming Kevin Warsh as his successor to Jerome Powell. While Warsh has shown a willingness to raise rates to combat inflation, Trump insists that a strong economy requires low rates and has used his platform at Truth Social to publicly lobby. The current context includes a strong jobs report, rising diesel prices due to conflicts in Iran, and the upcoming midterm elections, where inflation is a central issue.
If something characterizes Donald Trump's politics, it is the incessant pressure, blackmail for many, when something obsesses him. The president this Friday demanded that the Federal Reserve (Fed) drastically cut interest rates at the next meeting (September 15-16) or, otherwise, he will cut off trade with countries with which the United States maintains trade deficits.
Trump issued this wide-ranging ultimatum in a post on Truth Social, his social network, in response to a much stronger-than-expected monthly jobs report, urging the central bank and its president, Kevin Warsh, to “come to their senses” and cut interest rates.
But this unexpectedly good employment report rather opens the door to an increase in these rates, as many members of the Fed were already betting, to combat rampant inflation and avoid overheating of the economy. The example is in the price of diesel in the US, which has reached a record of $5.85 on average while the war in Iran disrupts fuel supplies around the world. Since diesel is used in many freight and delivery networks, the increase in its price translates into higher transportation costs for a long list of everyday products. And the supermarket bill skyrockets for citizens.
This August there was an addition of 162,000 jobs, well above the 53,000 that economists predicted. The unemployment rate remained stable at 4.1%, as expected. In addition to the increase recorded last month, the figures for June and July were revised upwards. From a destruction of 23,000 jobs in July, it went to a more positive figure of 21,000, which only reinforces the idea that the Fed's true front is inflation and even more so when its president, Kevin Warsh, accepted last week that he is willing to raise rates to combat it.
Along these lines, the Dow Jones reacted on the stock market when the information on the labor market was known. The futures index fell nearly 170 points by mid-afternoon as expectations grew that the Federal Reserve would raise rates immediately.
Trump, who put Warsh at the head of the Fed with a goal as specific as lowering rates, reacted according to the parameters that define his style: to attack.
"They have just announced extraordinary employment figures, which double and triple all forecasts (except mine!). And you still haven't seen anything!" he wrote. "Lower interest rates because the United States now has a much more solid credit position than it did very recently. A strong country means a lower interest rate, it is better credit, very simple," he said.
"We should have the lowest interest rate of any country in the world, just like the old days. If the United States stopped allowing them to maintain their huge surpluses, and we could end that immediately, they would no longer be considered part of the financial elite," he continued.
"Lower the rates or I will stop trading with the countries with which we have a deficit, something that the US Supreme Court, in its ridiculous and very costly decision on tariffs, firmly recognized that the president has an absolute right to do. It is better than tariffs!", he stressed in his outburst. "The Federal Reserve board, with its great new leader, must come to its senses. Be patriotic for once. High interest rates place the United States at a very unfair disadvantage, and I will not allow that to happen," he intimidated with his note.
The message is a clear sign that Trump is resuming his pressure campaign against the Fed, a pressure that had relaxed since the appointment of Warsh, his chosen successor to Jerome Powell, who always maintained the independence of the institution above the will of the president of the White House.
As analysts stressed, and taken at face value, the threat of ending trade with countries that maintain surpluses against the United States is extreme. The U.S. runs large trade deficits with dozens of countries, including its largest trading partners.
The message is launched two months before the midterm elections, in which Americans' discontent over the persistence of high inflation is one of the most relevant issues.
Trump has long called for lower interest rates and frequently complains about trade deficits with other countries, but he never pays attention to surveys and reports of citizens' complaints that everything has become much more expensive during his administration.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Federal Reserve will maintain or raise interest rates at its September 15-16 meeting despite pressure from Trump
Likely · Within weeks
Trump will continue to use his Truth Social platform to pressure the Fed and link monetary policy to international trade
Very likely · Within days
Open Questions
- Will the Federal Reserve agree to Trump's demands to cut rates before its September meeting?
- Which specific countries would be affected by a potential trade disruption announced by Trump?
- How will US trading partners respond to Trump's threat to weaponize the trade deficit?
- Does the president really have the legal authority to unilaterally cut off trade, as he claims, based on court decisions on tariffs?





