
民調專家戴立安公布台北市長選舉民調,民進黨參選人沈伯洋僅落後現任市長蔣萬安1.2個百分點。辜寬敏基金會臉書粉專發文諷刺藍營質疑民調準確性與資金來源,並引用歷史案例佐證民調可信度。
AI-generated summary
台北市長選舉即將進行,民進黨提名沈伯洋參選,現任市長蔣萬安尋求連任。民調成為衡量選情的重要指標。
民調專家戴立安昨公布台北市長選舉民調,民進黨台北市長參選人沈伯洋僅落後台北市長蔣萬安(見圖)1.2百分點。(資料照)
信民協會、民調專家戴立安昨(22日)公布台北市長選舉民調,民進黨台北市長參選人沈伯洋僅落後台北市長蔣萬安1.2百分點。消息一出引發藍營人士質疑,「辜寬敏基金會」臉書粉專則發文諷刺,藍營一下子說資金來源有問題,還有人說沈伯洋「穩了」應先辭掉立委,黨內崩潰到不行。發文也提及「蔣萬安別再笑了,民調數字就像DNA一樣不會騙人,不信可以回去問你爸爸」。
臉書粉專「辜寬敏基金會」發文指出,民調準不準,歷史會說話!差距1.2%的民調一公布,藍營的反應很有趣,一下子說資金來源有問題,還有人說沈伯洋「穩了」應先辭掉立委,黨內崩潰到不行。
請繼續往下閱讀...
「辜寬敏基金會」表示,戴立安的民調準不準,黃暐瀚給了一個參考案例:2008年北市第三選區,當時民調預測蔣孝嚴得票61.5%、郭正亮38.5%,最終開票結果蔣孝嚴得票60.3%、郭正亮38.4%,幾乎完美命中。
「辜寬敏基金會」直言,蔣萬安別再笑了,民調數字就像DNA一樣不會騙人,不信可以回去問你爸爸。
不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎 點我下載APP 按我看活動辦法
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
沈伯洋將在後續民調中進一步縮小與蔣萬安的差距
Possible · Within weeks

The Hong Kong government dismissed the European Union's 2025 annual report on Hong Kong as unfounded and biased, rejecting allegations that it is undermining fundamental freedoms. The government urged the EU to respect facts, abide by international law, and stop interference in what it described as China's internal affairs.

Chen Yongxing, the nominee for the Supervisory Yuan, held a press conference on the 23rd, calling on the Legislative Yuan to rationally exercise the power of consent for personnel of the Supervisory Committee when the new session opens on September 29, so as to prevent the Supervisory Yuan from continuing to idle. He expressed his support for transparency reform and suggested lowering the threshold for constitutional amendment and establishing a constitutional amendment committee. He also called on the president to convene a state conference to discuss constitutional transformation.

The Democratic Progressive Party's Xinzhuang District Councilor candidates Lin Bingyou, Weng Zhenzhou, Chen Daiyin, and Wu Yixuan will adopt a joint campaign and joint vote allocation method, and allocate votes evenly in the order of spring, summer, autumn and winter according to the lottery numbers. The goal is to help the mayoral candidate Su Qiaohui be elected and achieve a four-seat home run. Legislator Wu Bingrui called this the first joint campaign headquarters in New Taipei City.

KMT New Taipei mayor candidate Li Sichuan led party city councilors Liu Meifang, Lin Guochun and candidate Deng Kaixun to sweep the streets at Banqiao Longxing Market and received a warm welcome. In an exclusive interview, Li Sichuan criticized Su Qiaohui for "talking more with her mouth" and questioned her ability to coordinate and integrate. She pointed out that the New Taipei Rapid Transit was short of 5.41 billion in central subsidies and that Su had not allowed citizens to see the results of coordination. He also emphasized his grassroots background and service concept, and revealed that he would hold a collective rally with Han Guoyu, Hou Youyi, and Jiang Wanan at the Banqiao No. 1 Sports Stadium on October 4, saying that Hanguo Yu always cared about and was willing to help the platform.

Taipei Mayor Chiang Wanan was asked about the academic qualifications controversy when attending a cultural event. He emphasized that his academic qualifications are publicly available and available for inspection. In response to Ma Siku and others' accusations that he obtained a J.D. after studying at the University of Pennsylvania after studying for an LL.M. and that his official resume concealed this experience, he said that the issue of academic qualifications will be tested in every election.

Zhu Fenglian, spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, said that the Twin Cities Forum has been held for 16 years and has become a routine, and she believes it will be held this year in accordance with the routine. She criticized the Democratic Progressive Party authorities for stubbornly insisting on Taiwan's independence and deliberately setting up obstacles to unreasonably obstruct cross-strait exchanges. Chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council Qiu Chuizheng pointed out that China launched military exercises the day after Jiang Wanan attended the forum last year, and the forum did not promote cross-strait exchanges.