
The Hsinchu County Taxation Bureau reminds that if a natural person holds more than 3 low-current-value residential houses in his name, the fourth household will no longer enjoy tax exemption benefits.
AI-generated summary
The new housing tax 2.0 system will be officially implemented on July 1, 2024. This policy limits the number of tax-exempt households for natural persons who hold multi-family low-current-value residential houses across the country.
If there are more than 3 houses in the name that are used as homes and the current value of the house is below the tax exemption standard, a declaration should be made to the tax authority where the house is located to select a house that is exempt 40 days before the start of each period of housing tax.
"Why did I suddenly receive a housing tax bill this year when I didn't have to pay it before?" Recently, some people asked that the housing tax for several small apartments owned by them had not met the levy standard in the past, but they did not expect to receive a tax bill suddenly this year.
In this regard, the Hsinchu County Government Taxation Bureau explained that after the new housing tax 2.0 system is implemented, the number of tax-exempt households with low current value residential houses has been limited. Eligible people should pay special attention to the number of households in their name.
The tax bureau stated that the new housing tax 2.0 system has been officially implemented on July 1, 2024. For residential houses whose current value is less than a certain amount, the applicable objects and the number of households exempted from the housing tax have been adjusted. The new system stipulates that the number of tax-exempt households for natural persons holding multi-family low-current-value residential houses nationwide is limited to 3, and it is only applicable to natural persons. Houses under the name of legal persons are not applicable to this tax exemption.
Taking Hsinchu County as an example, those whose current value of residential houses is less than 111,000 yuan can be exempted from housing tax if they meet relevant conditions. If a natural person owns more than 3 residential houses that meet the low current value standard in his name, the fourth household will no longer enjoy the tax exemption. Therefore, it may happen that he did not receive a housing tax bill in the past but starts to receive a tax bill this year.
The tax bureau reminds that if a natural person owns more than 3 houses for household use and the current value of the house is below the tax exemption standard, he should apply to the tax authority where the house is located to select a house for exemption 40 days before each period of house tax is levied, that is, before March 22 of each year. People can choose the three houses they wish to be exempted from based on their own circumstances.
If the election is not reported within the time limit, there is no need to apply for redress. The tax bureau will give priority to the three households with the highest tax amounts as exempt according to regulations. The rest of the houses that meet the conditions but exceed the limit of exempt households will be levied housing tax in accordance with the law.
In addition, after the house owner completes the declaration and selection, or after approval by the tax collection agency, if the situation of the house held in the following years does not change, and there is no need to change the original declaration selection, in principle, there is no need to re-declare every year. If the housing holding situation changes in the future, relevant declarations should still be made in accordance with regulations.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Eligible people need to complete the declaration before March 22 of each year.
Very likely · Within months

Singer Bi Shujin accused his ex-girlfriend Wu Siying and five netizens of posting untrue statements about his cheating, drunken gaffes and abandoned pets on social platforms, which constituted blatant insult and aggravated slander. After investigation, the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office concluded that Wu Siying was the person who witnessed the incident, and other netizens relied on her posts to paraphrase the comments. Although the content was harsh, it was a reasonable comment on the conduct of a public figure and did not meet the criminal threshold. Therefore, all six people were punished without prosecution.

Former Kuomintang representative Xu Shangxian was sentenced by the Kaohsiung District Court in accordance with the Forgery of Private Documents and Personal Information Act for initiating the recall of legislators Xu Zhijie and Huang Jie, forging joint signatures and misusing personal information. Xu Shangxian was given a suspended sentence, while accomplice Zhu Lei was found not guilty.

Zada, a 47-year-old Afghan legal permanent resident living in Texas, was deported from the country by the secret "Foreign Terrorist Removal Tribunal" launched by the United States for the first time in 30 years on suspicion of assisting his family in planning terrorist attacks. Zada has given up his appeal and his defense lawyers have accused the court of violating due process.

Japan's Ministry of Justice plans to launch an experiment next year to allow consenting sex offenders on parole to carry GPS devices with them to study the effectiveness of location information in preventing recidivism. However, this move will also trigger discussions on issues such as privacy protection and social rehabilitation.

A woman surnamed Shen in Keelung refused to move out when her lease expired. After the court ruled that she had to move, the boyfriend of the landlord's niece, surnamed Zhang, published the verdict and Shen's ID card on the Threads platform. Shen reported that her personal information had been leaked. After a trial, the Keelung District Court found that Zhang had illegally used other people's personal information and violated the Personal Data Protection Act. She was sentenced to two months in prison and Yike fined her 60,000 yuan.
The plot of the TV series "Ask the Heart 2" has drawn attention to the leakage of patient privacy. Medical staff who disclose a patient's condition without consent are suspected of infringement. The law clearly stipulates that medical institutions and medical staff should keep patient privacy confidential. The leaker must bear tort liability. Patients can safeguard their rights through fixed evidence, negotiation or litigation, and medical institutions should establish and improve privacy protection systems to avoid legal risks.