Breaking
ARDead and wounded in Israeli raids on southern and eastern Lebanon, and the Israeli army announces the targeting of Hezbollah warehousesCNScrutiny Grows Over Argentina-Run University Residence in Paris Ahead of Milei VisitTRShocking allegations in the İbrahim Ekici incident in Müge AnlıINTLSyria's Transitional Justice: Between Symbolic Verdicts and Victim-Centered DemandsITVenice 2026, fourth day: Nanni Moretti, Oasis and Robert Pattinson expectedCNTamsui pharmacist was involved in giving sleeping pills to a female college student. Ministry of Health and Welfare: Issued a document on the 7th to conduct on-site verification of the most serious revocation certificateFRA gathering organized in Pontoise a year after the death of Dylan, suspected of a robberyFRWar in Ukraine: Donald Trump's emissaries expected in Moscow and kyivTRThe doctor was arrested in the investigation into the death of Arif Ahmet DenizolgunCRYPTO-FROpenAI subsidizes access to its cybersecurity tools in the face of AI risksARDead and wounded in Israeli raids on southern and eastern Lebanon, and the Israeli army announces the targeting of Hezbollah warehousesCNScrutiny Grows Over Argentina-Run University Residence in Paris Ahead of Milei VisitTRShocking allegations in the İbrahim Ekici incident in Müge AnlıINTLSyria's Transitional Justice: Between Symbolic Verdicts and Victim-Centered DemandsITVenice 2026, fourth day: Nanni Moretti, Oasis and Robert Pattinson expectedCNTamsui pharmacist was involved in giving sleeping pills to a female college student. Ministry of Health and Welfare: Issued a document on the 7th to conduct on-site verification of the most serious revocation certificateFRA gathering organized in Pontoise a year after the death of Dylan, suspected of a robberyFRWar in Ukraine: Donald Trump's emissaries expected in Moscow and kyivTRThe doctor was arrested in the investigation into the death of Arif Ahmet DenizolgunCRYPTO-FROpenAI subsidizes access to its cybersecurity tools in the face of AI risks
BackJury deadlock in Lindsay Clancy case, accused of killing her three children in the USA
Jury deadlock in Lindsay Clancy case, accused of killing her three children in the USA
Developing
NTV Dünya46 minutes agoLaw2 min readTürkiyeView original

Jury deadlock in Lindsay Clancy case, accused of killing her three children in the USA

After the jury could not reach a unanimous decision on criminal responsibility, Judge William Sullivan declared the trial invalid.

Quick Look

In the case of former nurse Lindsay Clancy, who was accused of killing her three children in the USA, the jury could not reach consensus and the court declared the trial invalid.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

Lindsay Clancy is accused of murdering her three children in her Massachusetts home in 2023, and her defense argues that she suffered postpartum psychosis at the time of the incident.

Font size

The jury deadlock could not be overcome in the case of Lindsay Clancy, who is accused of killing her three young children in the USA, and has been on the national agenda for weeks. The court declared the trial invalid after the jurors failed to reach a unanimous decision on Clancy's criminal responsibility.

After six weeks of trials, the jury deliberated more than 40 hours over seven days and was deadlocked three times, the court reported.

"At this point, I rule that the jury is deadlocked and I declare the trial null and void," Judge William Sullivan told the jury on Friday. He dismissed the members by saying.

The decision again threw 36-year-old Clancy's future into uncertainty.

THE JURY COULD NOT REACH UNANIMOUS

In US law, in order for a person to be found guilty, the jury must find the defendant guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" and unanimously.

In the Clancy case, the jury could not meet this requirement after nearly a week of deliberations.

A locked jury does not mean that Clancy was found not guilty or that the prosecution has proven its charges. The decision on how the case will proceed from now on has not yet been made.

It is expected that the path to be followed by the prosecution will become clear at the new hearing to be held on September 29.

Prosecutors may request a retrial for Clancy, or reaching an agreement between the parties is also an option.

Clancy will continue to be held on the same murder charges and will remain in the mental health facility where he is currently based.

THEY TRIED TO BLOCK THE DECISION AT THE LAST MINUTE

Friday's hearing began with Clancy's attorney, Kevin Reddington, requesting that one of the jurors be removed from the panel.

In the note he sent to the court the day before, the jury chairman stated that one member did not comply with the legal instructions given by the judge regarding "reasonable suspicion".

Reddington requested that this person be removed from the jury panel, but Judge Sullivan rejected the request and sent the members back to deliberate.

About an hour later, the jury returned to the courtroom and announced that it could not reach a unanimous decision.

Sullivan then said he had no choice but to overrule the trial.

“11 JURY MEMBERS WERE GOING TO DECISION IN FAVOR OF CLANCY”

In his statement after the hearing, attorney Reddington said he believed that 11 of the 12 jurors were ready to make a decision in favor of Clancy.

However, since jury deliberations are secret, it is not known which way the members actually voted.

The 11-to-1 spread claimed by the defense has also not been officially confirmed.

HE DOES NOT DENIES KILLING HIS THREE CHILDREN

Clancy is accused of strangling 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan to death at the family home in Massachusetts in 2023.

Clancy, a former nurse, denies killing her children but has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder.

The defense argues that Clancy experienced postpartum psychosis at the time of the incident, could not distinguish between right and wrong, and therefore was not criminally responsible.

After killing his children, Clancy stabbed himself with a knife and jumped out of the second-floor window. Clancy, who was paralyzed as a result of the incident, followed the hearings in a wheelchair.

TRUMP WAS ALSO INVOLVED IN THE CASE

The case received a lot of attention in the United States, especially because of the controversy surrounding postpartum psychosis and criminal liability. It was stated that more than 200 members of the press came to the court every day, in addition to those who followed the hearings via live broadcasts.

US President Donald Trump also participated in the discussion.

Trump called the case a "horrible tragedy" at the White House on Friday, saying, "He did a terrible, terrible thing. It couldn't get any worse." he said.

Stating that he predicts Clancy will be retried, Trump said, "There will be a price to pay for this." he said. The process regarding whether Clancy will be retried is expected to take shape at the hearing on September 29.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • It is expected that the prosecutor's office will request a retrial or an agreement will be reached.

    Likely · Within weeks

Open Questions

  • Will the prosecution request a retrial?
  • What decision will be taken at the hearing on September 29?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by NTV Dünya.

Related Stories

2 Years 2 Months-9 Years 8 Months Imprisonment Requested for Göktaş on Allegations of Insulting the President and Insulting Religious Values
Developing·

2 Years 2 Months-9 Years 8 Months Imprisonment Requested for Göktaş on Allegations of Insulting the President and Insulting Religious Values

The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office requested a prison sentence of 2 years, 2 months to 9 years, 8 months for Göktaş, on allegations of insulting the president, inciting and humiliating the public to hatred and hostility, and praising the crime and the criminal. Göktaş was arrested on July 3, 2026, for allegedly insulting the president and publicly insulting the religious values ​​adopted by a segment of the public.

Hürriyet Anasayfa
1 min read
Digital incomes of civil servants were included in the scope of the trade ban of Law No. 657
Law·

Digital incomes of civil servants were included in the scope of the trade ban of Law No. 657

The General Secretariat of the Presidency notified YÖK that the income earned by civil servants from website content production and platforms such as YouTube is within the scope of the trade ban article of the Civil Servants Law No. 657. DMS President Tuncay Cengiz said that a complete ban on off-duty digital production is incompatible with the realities of the age and called for the law to be reorganized according to the digital age.

Cumhuriyet
More on this topiclindsay clancy