
Defense attorneys argue the regulator is attempting to advance its own interests through the back door of the criminal proceedings.
Gannon Ken Van Dyke, accused of using nonpublic information to trade Polymarket event contracts, is challenging the CFTC's attempt to file an amicus brief in his criminal fraud case, labeling the regulator's move as a tactical maneuver.
AI-generated summary
Van Dyke was charged in April with fraud for allegedly trading event contracts on Polymarket using nonpublic information regarding the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Gannon Ken Van Dyke, a soldier who allegedly made more than $400,000 using nonpublic information to trade event contracts on prediction market platform Polymarket, is pushing back against attempts by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to weigh in on his criminal case.
In a Monday filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, Van Dyke’s lawyers opposed the CFTC’s efforts to file an amicus brief relating to claims in his case. The letter referred to the commodities regulator’s counsel filing a notice requesting permission from the court to provide its views on many of Van Dyke’s defense claims, including that event contracts on platforms like Polymarket were not “swaps” under the purview of the CFTC.
“The CFTC is no sheep ‘friend of the Court’ here,” said defense attorneys. “It is a regulatory wolf, with its own case against Mr. Van Dyke that it refuses to pursue itself. Rather, like a true coursing predator, the CTFC seeks to advance its own interests through the back door of an amicus brief instead of facing its own case against Mr. Van Dyke head on. This Court should not countenance the CFTC’s litigation gambits.”
US authorities charged Van Dyke with fraud in April over allegations he traded event contracts on Polymarket related to the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January, an operation for which he was privy to nonpublic information. The incident has been one of the leading cases lawmakers and critics of prediction markets point to as an example of potential manipulation on platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket.
A federal judge already ordered that the CFTC’s civil case against Van Dyke be stayed “pending the outcome of the criminal proceeding.” He has pleaded not guilty to all charges and a criminal trial could potentially begin in late 2026 or early 2027.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Criminal trial for Gannon Ken Van Dyke could begin in late 2026 or early 2027.
Possible · Within months

The Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation have filed a lawsuit in Sangamon County challenging Illinois's upcoming 0.2% digital asset tax. The plaintiffs argue the tax violates federal and state laws, seeking an injunction before the Jan. 1, 2027, start date.

Former FTX and Alameda executives receive trading bans, US prosecutors oppose a soldier's motion over Polymarket bets, and a $165 million crypto fraud indictment is unsealed.

A King County Superior Court judge has ordered Kalshi to shut down most of its Washington operations, deeming its activities a violation of the state's Gambling Act and Consumer Protection Act. The order prohibits wagers on various topics, including sports and elections, and mandates geofencing by specific deadlines.

Baltimore sues Kalshi and Polymarket, alleging they operate unlicensed sports betting platforms, misleading users on legality; companies claim federal regulation supersedes state laws.

A federal judge ordered a stay on a CFTC civil case against US soldier Gannon Ken Van Dyke, who faces criminal charges for allegedly using nonpublic information to profit over $400,000 on Polymarket contracts regarding Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a formal mandate upholding former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried's conviction on seven felony counts and his 25-year prison sentence.