
The voice recording, which was spread on social media and claimed to belong to AKP Provincial Chairman Zihni Serhan Diyarbakırlı, created controversy.
AI-generated summary
Alleged voice recordings published on social media and attributed to a political figure are causing public controversy.
A voice recording spread on social media in Kilis and claimed to belong to AKP Provincial Chairman Zihni Serhan Diyarbakırlı caused controversy.
It was claimed that the recording, which was stated to last approximately 6 minutes, included a conversation regarding the request of a young woman whose job location had been changed to return to her previous place of employment.
“HOW WILL YOU CONVINCE ME?” HIS STATEMENT WAS ON THE AGENDA
In the recording shared on social media, the male voice, claimed to belong to Diyarbakır, asks the woman, "How will you convince me?" regarding her request to return to her former position. he allegedly asked.
It was claimed that the woman said that she would think about this issue until they met face to face.
“ARE YOU HOME ALONE RIGHT NOW?” THE QUESTION WAS ALSO IN THE RECORDING
In another noteworthy part of the recording, it was claimed that the male voice asked the woman whether she was alone at home and used expressions indicating that he was worried about his family being aware of the conversation.
It was claimed that at the beginning of the conversation, the woman was asked if there was anyone else around her and asked to end the conversation in case of a possible problem.
IT WAS ALLEGED THAT HE WANTED TO RETURN TO HIS OLD PLACE OF DUTY
In the recording, it was claimed that the woman wanted to return to her old position at the hospital, and the male voice said that she "had to convince" him for this.
There is no independent verification of the source and integrity of the audio recording spread on social media.
STATEMENT FROM DIYARBAKIRLI: “IT WAS ASSEMBLED, TAKEN OUT OF ITS CONTEXT”
Zihni Serhan Diyarbakırlı, who made a statement following the allegations, argued that the audio recording circulated on social media was edited and taken out of context.
Diyarbakırlı stated that people's reputations cannot be targeted with content whose source has not been verified, and that a legal process has been initiated against those who "create perceptions" based on the recording in question.
In the statement, it was also stated that we would not remain silent against threats, slander and manipulation.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Opening an investigation within the scope of legal process
Likely · Within weeks
Minister of Justice Akın Gürlek met with reporters at Çağlayan Courthouse and made statements about unsolved murders, AHBAP investigation, illegal betting and match-fixing allegations, the death of Explorer Kozinoğlu, FETO and the Terror-Free Turkey process.

Minister of Justice Akın Gürlek stated that all aspects of the investigation into the suspicious death of former MİT officer Kaşif Kozinoğlu in prison were investigated and action was taken according to the evidence.

Likud denied Haaretz's news that the UAE leader warned Netanyahu before October 7, claimed that Mohammed Dahlan and Yair Golan were behind it, and demanded an investigation.

Minister of Justice Akın Gürlek made statements about many current judicial and legal developments from the unknown files to the AHBAP investigation, from the investigation into Kashif Kozinoğlu's death to the Imamoglu case and the Non-Terrorist Turkey process.

Minister of Justice Akın Gürlek, in his meeting with courthouse reporters in Istanbul, stated that Gülistan Doku may have been eliminated with chemical substances and announced that all possibilities, including murder, were evaluated in the Kaşif Kozinoğlu investigation and that a conquest of the grave would be carried out on her grave.

Alevi-Bektashi Rights Defenders supported the reaction statement of 53 Alevi intellectuals regarding PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan's use of the phrase 'Yavuz Sultan Selim - İdrisi Bitlisi alliance' for the solution of the Kurdish problem. In the declaration, it was emphasized that this statement triggered the memory of the historical massacre and exile of the Alevi community and that it was unacceptable to propose such historical symbols as a political solution.