
AI-generated summary
The 2020 West Sea civil servant shooting incident was an incident in which Lee Dae-jun, a civil servant at the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, was shot and killed by North Korean soldiers in North Korean waters after his disappearance. In the initial investigation, the possibility of defecting to North Korea was raised, but the investigation results were later overturned, leading to controversy.
(Incheon = Yonhap News) Reporter Choi Eun-ji = A Coast Guard official who was dismissed from his position after making a judgment that placed more weight on the side of 'civil servant defecting to North Korea' in relation to the 2020 attack on a civil servant in the West Sea filed an administrative lawsuit and won.
The Incheon District Court's Administrative Division 1-2 (Chief Judge Choi Sang-soo) announced on the 27th that it ruled in favor of the plaintiff in the lawsuit filed by Superintendent Kim Tae-gyun (currently Pohang Coast Guard Chief) against the Chief of the Coast Guard requesting cancellation of his dismissal from his position.
The court revoked the Coast Guard's decision to remove Superintendent Kim from his position and ordered him to pay all legal costs.
The 'West Sea Civil Servant Attack' is an incident in which Lee Dae-jun, who was a member of the West Sea Fishery Management Team of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, went missing in the southern waters of Soyeonpyeong Island, Ongjin-gun, Incheon, and was shot dead by North Korean soldiers in North Korean waters the next day.
Superintendent Kim served as the head of the Coast Guard's criminal division at the time and attended the announcement of the results of the third interim investigation.
Inspector General Kim reported Mr. Lee's motive for defecting to North Korea following the instructions of the Coast Guard Commissioner, and in announcing the results of the investigation, he explained that "Mr. Lee was thinking about defecting to North Korea after spending the money he spent on crab purchases on gambling."
However, two years later, the Coast Guard and the Ministry of National Defense announced the results of an investigation that overturned the previous contents, and the Board of Audit and Inspection requested disciplinary action from the Coast Guard, claiming that Superintendent Kim had distorted the investigation details to create the basis for Mr. Lee's decision to defect to North Korea.
Afterwards, the Coast Guard relieved Superintendent Kim, who was also reported to the prosecution on charges of writing false official documents, from his position on December 29, 2023.
Superintendent Kim had not been assigned to his position for about 1 year and 6 months since July 2022, before he was relieved of his position, and was effectively on a waiting list.
The court judged that the Coast Guard's action was an unfair abuse of personnel rights.
The court ruled, “The plaintiff was already at a disadvantage in terms of status and property because he had not been assigned to a position for a long period of time, and since he was dismissed from a position that did not exist in reality, it was a deviation and abuse of his discretion.”
In addition, it was taken into consideration that, following the confirmation of innocence of the former Chief of the Coast Guard, Inspector General Kim was also non-indicted by the prosecution last July.
The court stated the reason for the plaintiff's victory, saying, "It cannot be said that the plaintiff's misconduct was serious or that it made it difficult to perform normal duties."
Accordingly, the Coast Guard's internal disciplinary action related to the West Sea civil servant shooting incident was overturned one after another by the court.
Former Namhae Coast Guard Chief Yoon Seong-hyun, who previously announced the results of the interim investigation into the West Sea civil servant shooting incident as the head of the Coast Guard's Investigation and Intelligence Bureau, won a lawsuit filed against the Coast Guard Chief for the cancellation of suspension and dismissal.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
There is a possibility that the Coast Guard will appeal against this ruling.
Possible · Within weeks

Jeonju District Court's Criminal Division 6 sentenced Mr. A (34) to one year in prison, two years probation, and 80 hours of community service for failing to comply with a breathalyzer test request and attempting to leave the scene. Mr. A refused the request for a breathalyzer test after causing an accident and trying to escape. Although he has a history of drunk driving in the past, the sentence was decided considering his reflection.

Changwon District Court sentenced Mr. A, in his 60s, to 10 months in prison for threatening an acquaintance who reported him several times after serving a prison sentence for drunk driving. On March 26, Mr. A was indicted for sending threatening messages, including 'I will kill you,' five times to an acquaintance in his 30s who had previously reported drunk driving. The court announced that it had sentenced him to a heavy sentence considering the victim's mental pain and the fact that he had committed multiple offenses.

Mr. A, a man in his 60s suffering from dementia, and two police officers who were looking for him were stranded on a rock near Morye Port in Hyangchon-dong, Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, due to high tide, but they were all rescued by the Coast Guard rescue team.

The Eastern Branch of the Busan District Court announced that Navy Sergeant A was indicted on charges of forcibly molesting his same-sex subordinate Sergeant B three times on board a ship, but the sentence of six months in prison was postponed in consideration of the agreement with the victim and the low possibility of recidivism.

The Chungju Branch of the Cheongju District Court announced on the 27th that it sentenced Mr. A, a former national water polo player who molested a subway passenger while drunk, to a fine of 5 million won for violating the Special Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes, etc. Mr. A admitted to the crime, and although he had a similar criminal record in the past, the judge explained that the sentence was decided by taking into account the agreement with the victim.

The Uijeongbu District Court announced that a man in his 60s was sentenced to four years in prison for stealing cash and assaulting the victim by threatening him with a weapon when he was discovered stealing the key to an acquaintance's house and sneaking in and out for a long period of time to steal food. The court explained that it took into account the betrayal of trust and the deterioration of the robbery, but also took into account the defendant's recognition and reflection, economic hardship, and small damages.