
AI-generated summary
Mr. A was sentenced to 1 year and 2 months in prison by the Changwon District Court in January last year for violating the Road Traffic Act (refusing a breathalyzer test), and was found to have committed the crime 4 days after his sentence ended on March 22.
A man in his 60s was sentenced to prison for drunk driving and threatened several times an acquaintance who reported him after serving prison time.
According to the legal community on the 27th, the Changwon District Court's Criminal Division 2 (Chief Judge Kim Seong-hwan) sentenced Mr. A, in his 60s, to 10 months in prison, who was recently handed over to trial on charges of threatening retaliation under the Act on Aggravated Punishment for Specific Crimes.
On March 26, Mr. A was indicted on charges of threatening to harm his life and body by contacting an acquaintance in his 30s who reported his drunk driving to the investigative agency five times, saying, "I will kill you."
Mr. A was sentenced to 1 year and 2 months in prison by the Changwon District Court in January last year for violating the Road Traffic Act (refusing to take a breathalyzer test) and was found to have committed this crime 4 days after his sentence ended on March 22.
The court pointed out, "The victim appears to have felt considerable mental pain and anxiety, so the guilt is heavy and there is a high possibility of blame," and "Although he has a history of being punished for numerous criminal offenses, especially violent crimes, he committed this crime again during the period of repeated offenses."
He then stated the reason for the sentencing, saying, "However, we comprehensively took into consideration the fact that he admitted to the crime and that it was not a crime committed by personally visiting and threatening him face-to-face."

Jeonju District Court's Criminal Division 6 sentenced Mr. A (34) to one year in prison, two years probation, and 80 hours of community service for failing to comply with a breathalyzer test request and attempting to leave the scene. Mr. A refused the request for a breathalyzer test after causing an accident and trying to escape. Although he has a history of drunk driving in the past, the sentence was decided considering his reflection.

Mr. A, a man in his 60s suffering from dementia, and two police officers who were looking for him were stranded on a rock near Morye Port in Hyangchon-dong, Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, due to high tide, but they were all rescued by the Coast Guard rescue team.

The Eastern Branch of the Busan District Court announced that Navy Sergeant A was indicted on charges of forcibly molesting his same-sex subordinate Sergeant B three times on board a ship, but the sentence of six months in prison was postponed in consideration of the agreement with the victim and the low possibility of recidivism.

The Chungju Branch of the Cheongju District Court announced on the 27th that it sentenced Mr. A, a former national water polo player who molested a subway passenger while drunk, to a fine of 5 million won for violating the Special Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes, etc. Mr. A admitted to the crime, and although he had a similar criminal record in the past, the judge explained that the sentence was decided by taking into account the agreement with the victim.

The Incheon District Court announced on the 27th that it ruled in favor of the plaintiff in an administrative lawsuit filed by Superintendent Kim Tae-gyun, head of the Coast Guard's criminal division, who wrote and reported on the motive of the late Lee Dae-jun for defecting to North Korea in the West Sea civil servant shooting incident, requesting the cancellation of his dismissal from his position. The court ruled that the dismissal from position was an unfair abuse of personnel rights, and ordered the Coast Guard to bear the costs of the lawsuit.

The Uijeongbu District Court announced that a man in his 60s was sentenced to four years in prison for stealing cash and assaulting the victim by threatening him with a weapon when he was discovered stealing the key to an acquaintance's house and sneaking in and out for a long period of time to steal food. The court explained that it took into account the betrayal of trust and the deterioration of the robbery, but also took into account the defendant's recognition and reflection, economic hardship, and small damages.