
AI-generated summary
Internet drug trafficking methods are constantly changing, from candies and drink names to code words for young people. In recent years, seemingly normal terms such as "music lessons" have been circulated, but in fact they may disguise illegal transactions and make identification more difficult.
Internet drug trafficking methods are constantly changing, from the names of candies and drinks, to code words used by some young people, to seemingly straightforward phrases such as "music lessons" that have been circulated in recent years. However, senior police officers said that more than half of the drug trafficking messages and code words circulating on the Internet are most likely not actual drug trafficking, but traps set by fraud syndicates. Not only should the public be careful, but also the investigation work faces unprecedented challenges.
More than half of online drug sales may be scams
A senior criminal police officer pointed out that in the past, drug codes could be associated with the appearance, packaging or method of administration. Nowadays, terms such as "music class" have escaped from the drug itself and have been replaced by behavioral or situational cues. It is difficult to identify drug transactions by relying on words alone. If there is only a single keyword , code words or pictures, and lack of evidence of actual transactions, cash flows, drugs, and connections between buyers and sellers. It is not easy to further investigate and handle. Even if the platform removes the post, the suspect may immediately change his account and start a new one, creating a "delete one, re-create another" tracing dilemma.
Please read on...
The Taichung City Criminal Police Brigade pointed out that if a website or platform is determined by the government or court to involve fraud, illegality, or security risks, telecom operators can be legally required to block public connections by modifying the Domain Name System (DNS). However, drug trafficking messages use a lot of slang and metaphors. If it is not clearly proven that the post is illegal, it will be difficult for the platform to completely block it with just one word.
In the past, the police have stepped up surveillance on suspected drug codes such as "candy", but this has accidentally affected normal online merchants. There have even been cases where legally sold candy products were mistakenly removed from the shelves by the system, triggering protests from the industry. Nowadays, "music lessons" itself is a common term in daily life. If it is completely blocked, normal music teaching, courses and related content may be affected. Therefore, it is almost impossible to rely on "banned keywords" to solve the problem.
In addition, there are scams on the Internet under the guise of drug trafficking. Senior police officers pointed out that many so-called drug trafficking advertisements on the Internet are actually scams. The suspects believe that even if drug buyers are deceived, they may not dare to ask for help because they are afraid that reporting the crime will be like "self-certified drug purchase."
In the face of Internet drug slang, we cannot just rely on keywords to "block every one we see." We must cooperate with the police, digital authorities, platform operators and other units to conduct comprehensive cross-tracing from account numbers, contacts, transactions, cash flow and specific criminal activities. We also remind the public not to send money out of curiosity or intention to buy drugs, otherwise not only may they be exposed to drugs, but they may also become a cash machine for a fraud group.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The police and digital authorities will strengthen cooperation with platform operators to combat online drug trafficking fraud through account, communication and cash flow tracing.
Likely · Within months

NYPD transit chief Joseph Gulotta reported a 9% increase in felony assaults in the New York City subway system this year, with assaults on elderly straphangers, police officers, and MTA workers accounting for nearly 50% of incidents. While overall assaults rose, random and unprovoked attacks declined slightly, and most suspects are repeat offenders.

A 60-year-old grandmother from Pingtung suffered long-term mental violence and control from her husband after her marriage. After enduring it for 35 years, she applied for a protection order and filed for divorce in 114. After hearing the case, the Pingtung District Court determined that the marital relationship was irreversible and granted divorce, ending her 35-year marriage.

The Taipei City Shilin District Court recently concluded a domestic violence case and found that a man surnamed Lu lost control after drinking. He broke into the house with his bare hands and threatened his wife and violated her freedom of movement. He committed a crime of coercion and was sentenced to 50 days of detention and a fine of NT$50,000.

Huang Shengxuan, the chairman of Jingyuan Tungsten Cobalt Resources Co., Ltd. in Fangliao Township, Pingtung County, was killed. Although the police arrested a former employee named Lin, the victim's family came forward to clarify that Lin had no personal relationship with the deceased and did not work at his home. He was only a former employee who resigned due to stealing cables in the past. The worker suspected that Lin might be a puppet assigned to commit the crime, and that behind it were technological competition or national security concerns. He also claimed that the real murderer pointed out by the deceased in his dream had not yet been brought to justice. Due to the continuous rain, the police emphasized that they would conduct on-site simulations and witness interrogations, and the case was still under investigation.

Parents revealed that drug trading information was circulated on the Internet under the code name "Music Lesson" and other codenames. They were worried that young people might be exposed to drugs by mistake, and questioned the platform's failure to actively remove the drug from the shelves. The competent authority said it would provide information to the platform for processing.

Since 2013, Zhang Jiarong and Liang Lifen have assisted five companies, including Yamulei, Yantu, Fengqun, Weiyu and Lanrui, to create thousands of fake invoices to fabricate revenue of 5 billion yuan, defrauded seven banks including First Bank, Cooperation Bank, and Mega Bank to obtain loans of more than 1 billion yuan, and evaded 40 million yuan in business tax. The New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office investigated and prosecuted Zhang, Liang and seven others. The couple requested a prison sentence of 18 years each and a fine of NT$50 million.