
While the court decided to release the two men, Ekrem İmamoğlu requested that the hearings be broadcast live. Lawyers objected to the sessions extending until midnight.
AI-generated summary
The trial process continues in the IMM case; Release requests and defense statements of the defendants are being received.
The IMM Case continues on its 75th day.
At the last hearing in the case on Thursday, the court decided to release Bakırköy Municipality Deputy Mayor Ali Rıza Akyüz and businessman Serkan Öztürk within the scope of the detention review. Many families whose relatives have been detained for more than a year and a half reacted to the release of only two people out of 53 detainees.
Ekrem İmamoğlu, who requested release before the court panel announced its decision, reiterated his request for the hearings to be broadcast live and said, "I want the case to be broadcast live, and I want it to be doubled. The hearings from the first day it started to the present should also be broadcast. Our nation should watch every moment of it. The dates did not match, the figures did not add up, the statements of the slanderers refuted each other. Whatever they said as evidence for months was eliminated in the courtroom. What is left behind is not an indictment established with evidence, but a scenario that is tried to be kept alive with contradictions." "It remained," he said.
The case, in which requests for the release of the detainees were received last week, will continue this week with the defense of the defendants who are not detained. Within the scope of the second hearing, which started on August 17, 81 of the 325 undetained defendants made their defense.
Here are the developments in the case, moment by moment...
11.55 - SELİM İMAMOĞLU AT THE ROOM
Later in the case, Ekrem İmamoğlu's son, Selim İmamoğlu, came to the podium.
11.30 - DEFENSES STARTED
Following Beijing's objection, the hearing started with the defense of detained businessman Necmeddin Şimşek. Later, businessman Alptekin Polat made a short defense.
11.15 - "IF THE TIMES CONTINUE LIKE THIS, AS IMAMOĞLU'S LAWYERS, WE WILL NOT BE HERE AFTER 18:00"
After the court panel and the detainees took their seats, the hearing started with the objection of Tora Beijing, one of Ekrem İmamoğlu's lawyers, to the hearing hours.
While Beijing objected to the hearings extending into the middle of the night, it said that the sessions should not continue after 18:00 unless there was a special necessity.
Addressing the presiding judge, Beijing stated that long hearing hours harm the right to a fair trial, stated that the panel's decision on this issue was not clear and that they applied to the Turkish Medical Association (TTB) for this reason, and stated that they prepared a request regarding the hearing hours and the lawyers being out of town.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Continuation of the case with the defense of the detained defendants
Very likely · Within days

Delaware federal court decided Operation Bluebird v. gave an interim decision in the trademark case between . While the court ruled that X should continue to use the name 'Twitter', it rejected his request for an injunction on the 'Tweet' brand and the bird logo.

The Turkish Medical Association reported the negative effects of long-term hearings at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court on the physical and mental health of defendants and lawyers; He described these conditions as 'man-made trauma'.

Cihan Topal, Türkiye's first double arm transplant patient, suffers from the health boards preventing him from using commercial vehicles and motorcycles during his driver's license renewal process. Topal states that he can use his arms actively in his daily life.
The second hearing of the case with 19 defendants, including Bolu Mayor Tanju Özcan, who was tried and suspended from his duty on charges of bribery and extortion in Bolu, started at the Bolu Courthouse.

In the reopened investigation into the death of Explorer Kozinoğlu, allegations that a guard did not intervene by turning on the radio volume despite pressing the emergency button and that the medical team was having dinner were included in the file.

The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that annual leaves taken for less than 10 days with the consent of the employee will not constitute a justified reason for termination on their own.