
The judicial process begins in the case regarding the death of singer Gül Tut, who died by falling from the window of her house in Yalova. The singer's son, Tuğberk Yağız Gülter, called for support before the first hearing.
Before the first hearing in the case regarding the death of singer Gül Tut, who died by falling from the window in Yalova on September 26, 2025, her son Tuğberk Yağız Gülter called for justice and support on social media.
AI-generated summary
Singer Gül Tut (Güllü) died by falling from the window of her house on the 6th floor in Yalova on September 26, 2025.
The judicial process has begun in the investigation into the death of singer Gül Tut, known to the public as 'Güllü', who died by falling from the window of her 6th floor house in Yalova on September 26, 2025. Before the first hearing at Yalova 1st High Criminal Court, the singer's son Tuğberk Yağız Gülter made remarkable posts on his social media account.
In the lawsuit filed, the singer's daughter Tuğyan Ülkem Gülter is in the defendant's chair, demanding aggravated life imprisonment for the crime of "premeditated murder against the upper line", and her friend Sultan Nur Ulu is demanding up to 4 years in prison for the crime of "false testimony".
Addressing his followers and his mother's loved ones before the first hearing, Tuğberk Yağız Gülter emphasized that he did not want to be alone and called for support before the court.
Stating that he wanted to keep his mother's name alive and ensure that justice was served, Gülter said:
"I would like to make a call from here the day before the hearing. May God bless all my mother's loved ones and everyone who has been with me during this process. I invite everyone there so that they will not leave me and my mother alone at the hearing tomorrow. Please come, let's seek justice together in my mother's name."
Answering the public's questions about whether her sister is guilty or not, Gülter conveyed the complex emotions she felt. Gülter said that he would attend the hearing only for his mother, not with a personal attitude, and said:
"The most curious question is 'Do you believe Tuğyan is guilty or innocent?' There is a question. What I believe has no meaning in the judicial process of this file. Put yourself in my shoes; I neither want to believe that my mother's daughter may have harmed my mother, nor do I want to encounter such a thing. "I will be there for the hearing tomorrow, not on my own behalf, but on behalf of my mother."
Pointing out that the bond of brotherhood was broken during the process, Gülter had clearly expressed his stance at the hearing in his previous statement.
Referring to the discussions that took place between them in the past, Gülter completed his statement with the following words:
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The first hearing will be held at Yalova 1st High Criminal Court
Very likely · Within days

The decision of the Constitutional Court annulling the indefinite alimony article of the Turkish Civil Code will be published in the Official Gazette and enter into force on September 30, 2026, and will enter into full force on June 30, 2027, after a 9-month transition period. According to lawyers, the current system will continue during the transition period, new lawsuits can be filed and the status of past alimony will be clarified with the new regulation.

After a municipality failed to pay the rental fees for the work machines and vehicles rented, the creditor company seized the TV, air conditioner and air purifier devices in the mayor's office. The municipality announced that the process was resolved by consensus.

In the case of Gülşah Gizem Angı, who died as a result of fluid overload during hysteroscopic myomectomy surgery at Akdeniz University Hospital in 2022, the court ruled that it had no jurisdiction and referred the file to the high criminal court.

Social media phenomenon Dilan Polat was brought to the Anatolian Courthouse within the scope of the investigation initiated on charges of insulting the President. Polat, whose statement was taken, was released on condition of judicial control.
Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office announced that no inspection was carried out in the VAR room in Riva within the scope of the MHK investigation. TFF, on the other hand, previously announced that the police had conducted an investigation, but that the allegations of deleting digital materials were completely unfounded.

The first hearing of the case in which 3 police officers were tried for alleged negligence regarding the martyrdom of police officer Şeyda Yılmaz by fugitive suspect Yunus Emre Geçti in Ümraniye was held. Defendant police officer Abdullah A. denied the accusations and requested his acquittal.