
Shortly before the start of the trial, Tiktok averted proceedings in the US state of Alabama and committed itself to payments of at least 100 million dollars as well as usage time limits.
AI-generated summary
The US state of Alabama sued Tiktok and Bytedance in April 2025 for failing to protect minors from social media addiction.
The US state of Alabama accuses Tiktok of driving minors into social media addiction. Shortly before the trial begins, the video platform gives in and wants to pay. The amount is in the three-digit million range, but has not yet been exactly determined.
The video platform Tiktok has used a settlement to avert a trial planned for Monday in the US state of Alabama due to allegedly inadequate protection of minors from social media addiction. As Attorney General Steve Marshall announced on Friday (local time), the company will pay at least $100 million as part of the agreement and limit daily usage time for young users to two hours.
The minimum amount must therefore be paid within 45 days. Under certain conditions, it could be increased to up to $300 million, it said. The settlement ends the proceedings three days before the trial is scheduled to begin in Montgomery. Lawsuits from more than a dozen other US states against Tiktok remain unaffected.
Tiktok seduces young users like slot machines
The state of Alabama sued Tiktok and its Chinese parent company Bytedance in April 2025. The video app seduces young users in a similar way to “slot machines,” the lawsuit said. Investigators who registered as 13 to 15 year olds were shown videos about suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, alcohol and sex, among other things.
The state also accused Tiktok of deceiving parents about protective functions for minors. Tiktok had rejected the allegations and cited a US federal law that exempts online platforms from liability for content published by users.
This year, several trials have already taken place in the USA against Instagram and Facebook parent Meta and Google's video platform YouTube. They were sentenced to heavy fines.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Payment of the minimum amount of $100 million within 45 days
Very likely · Within weeks
The Dortmund public prosecutor's office is investigating a 105-year-old for aiding and abetting multiple murders. The accused is said to have worked as a guard in the Stalag 326 prisoner of war camp in Stukenbrock-Senne during the Second World War.
The Neustadt an der Weinstraße administrative court has dismissed the lawsuits brought by the city of Pirmasens and the district of Südwestpfalz against the municipal financial equalization of the state of Rhineland-Palatinate. The municipalities wanted to clarify the constitutionality of the distribution of funds.

The Federal Council has passed a law that will make e-scooter owners liable regardless of fault. This is intended to make it easier for victims of accidents or falls on incorrectly parked scooters to obtain compensation, as it was often impossible to identify the riders.
On Friday, the Federal Court of Justice announced a decision in the legal dispute over a street art project on a high-rise building in Wuppertal. An apartment owner is suing against the majority decision of the owners' association to decorate the north facade of the building with a large-format painting. He fears fundamental changes, an increase in visitors and the impossibility of installing air conditioning. The other side cites the 2024 resolution and the difficulty of achieving unanimity in large ownership associations.

A car buyer demanded over 122,000 euros in compensation for loss of use for a vehicle that was classified as not roadworthy, but which he continued to drive. The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court decided that there is no claim as long as the car is actually used, as there is no economic disadvantage.
The European Court of Justice has declared the Federal Court of Justice's three-year objection period against ineffective energy price increases to be incompatible with EU law. Customers no longer have to tacitly accept ineffective increases after three years. The Berlin Court of Appeal will now hear the case again.