AI-generated summary
The Trump administration had previously tried to enforce controversial mail-in voting rules, with an earlier victory in the Supreme Court achieved on procedural grounds without ruling on the substantive legality.
In the legal dispute over controversial new rules for postal voting in the USA, the government of US President Donald Trump has once again referred to the Supreme Court. She called for the decision of a lower court to be suspended. This has so far prevented them from implementing the new postal voting rules.
The US government is pushing for a quick decision less than two months before the midterm elections. She has therefore submitted an urgent application to the court. In the state of North Carolina, the first postal voting documents are scheduled to be sent out this Friday.
The Supreme Court had already ruled in Trump's favor in August when it overturned a federal court's order that had blocked Trump's controversial mail-in voting plans. However, this was done for procedural reasons. The judges did not decide on the substantive legality of the project. Last week, however, a US federal judge stopped the implementation of Trump's decree again for 14 days, which the government is now rebelling against again.
U.S. Postal Service should only send documents to verified individuals
According to Trump's plans, the US Postal Service (USPS) will play a central role in controlling postal voting in the future. Above all, it should only send postal voting documents to people who are verified US citizens on a voter list that was created with the participation of immigration and social security authorities. In addition, states should submit the design of their envelopes for postal voting to the postal service for approval.
Republicans defend the plans with the argument that they want to prevent alleged election fraud. Critics suspect that Trump's motive is that he wants to make voting by mail more difficult and thus disadvantage the Democratic Party, whose voters disproportionately vote by mail.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Supreme Court will grant the Trump administration's emergency motion and lift the lower court's stay.
Likely · Within days

Ulrich Siegmund, AfD's top candidate in Saxony-Anhalt, uses social media to present himself as an approachable son-in-law and challenger. Despite rising poll numbers and a one percentage point lead over the CDU candidate Schulze, his values are still below the AfD party values. A comparison with Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania shows that the AfD candidate achieves similar values there, without comparable media support. This suggests that the party is pulling the staff, not the other way around.
Three days before the state elections in Saxony-Anhalt, according to the ZDF political barometer, the AfD is leading with 41 percent, followed by the CDU with 23 percent. The Left is at 11.5 percent, the SPD at 8.5 percent and the Greens at 6 percent. The BSW and the FDP would miss the five percent hurdle.

In Saxony-Anhalt, according to a ZDF survey, the AfD is clearly ahead of the CDU (23 percent) with 41 percent. Many voters are still undecided. An AfD government would be a novelty and is being monitored nationally and internationally.
Sahra Wagenknecht viewed the resignations of three Thuringian BSW MPs as an attempt to damage her party before the election in Saxony-Anhalt. The MPs resigned in protest against the federal party leadership, which is calling for a change of course in Thuringia and rejecting government participation. The dispute over the direction focuses on the blackberry coalition and the revocation of Prime Minister Voigt's doctorate.

The EU Commission wants to link the allocation of free CO₂ certificates in the ETS with an investment obligation in order to force industry to invest in the climate. Industry representatives criticize this as government control. The CDU European MP Peter Liese suggests that the obligation initially only apply to additional certificates from 2031 in order to weaken the system.

AfD leads in new Saxony-Anhalt survey with 41% ahead of CDU (23%). The end of the election campaign is underway, the coalition with the AfD is controversial. At the same time, investigations into power grid sabotage in Brandenburg and North Rhine-Westphalia.